St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Guest Column

Here's what tax reform means to you

By STATE REP. TOM ANDERSON
Published June 26, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

Many people have been asking me questions about property tax reform that the Florida Legislature passed on June 14.

Therefore, I want to let you know that during the special session I supported a fair and reasonable tax relief proposal, a tax cut designed to save Florida's property owners nearly $32-billion over the next five years. The savings will come in two phases: Phase I this year, and Phase II will require voter approval of a constitutional amendment in 2008.

Phase I: We passed an immediate tax relief package of more than $15-billion, which does not require voter approval. This means real savings on your next property tax bill, this year.

With the governor's signature:

- Property taxes will be rolled back to last year's level and will be cut further based on a particular county's or city's record of taxing and spending. For Pinellas County government, that means an additional cut of 7 percent, and for Pasco County government an additional cut of 3 percent. Homesteaded property owners, second homeowners, snowbirds, owners of rental property, commercial and industrial properties will all receive tax savings.

- All local governments (except school districts) will be required to cap their annual property tax revenue growth. Property tax revenue will be allowed to grow no faster than the growth rate of Floridians' personal income and population growth of the state.

- The revenue cap creates unprecedented protections for all Florida properties, especially commercial properties and non-homestead residential properties, which currently have no protection.

- All taxpayers will be protected by making it harder for local governments to raise property taxes in the future.

This legislation will lead to immediate relief for Florida's homeowners, second-homeowners and commercial property owners. It also provides a cap so taxes are predictable and affordable in the future.

Phase II: On Jan. 29, voters will be given the opportunity to vote on how much they want to be taxed on their homes. If 60 percent of Florida's voters approve the constitutional amendment:

- Property taxes will be reduced by $16-billion over five years. The average homestead property owner will be able to save 44 percent or $1, 306 off his property tax bill.

- Homeowners will have the choice of the current Save Our Homes system or moving to a new system of super homestead exemptions based on the value of their home.

- These super homestead exemptions will create portability for homeowners who would otherwise lose significant tax savings when they move.

- No homeowner would have to leave the current Save Our Homes tax system unless they choose. If they wish, they can remain in that system as long as they own their current home.

- A new $25, 000 Tangible Personal Property tax (TPP) exemption for businesses will also be created, exempting 1-million small businesses from having to pay the tax. After next year, taxpayers would no longer be required to file returns for TPP.

- Targeted tax relief will also be offered for low-income seniors, affordable housing and working waterfronts.

I hope this information assists you in understanding the property tax reform legislation and encourages you to vote on Jan. 29.

State Rep. Tom Anderson, a Dunedin Republican, represents District 45, which includes parts of northwest Pinellas and southwest Pasco. Guest columnists write their own views, which do not necessarily reflect the opinions of this newspaper.

[Last modified June 26, 2007, 08:08:07]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Jeff 06/27/07 04:20 PM
Vote YES on Jan 29th 2008! This will help our real estate industry and bring in more families from across the nation to our beautiful state.
by Jeff 06/27/07 04:20 PM
Local governments will not be broke in the short run. Remember that Pinellas/Hillsborough already get an extra penny in sales tax they are racking in the money. Stop putting statues up and mature trees in medians and we will be fine.
by Jeff 06/27/07 04:19 PM
If most of you would acutually look at this plan and read it and understand it it is a good plan. The republicans will have better ones next year but the democrates are fighting for big government yet again and don't want to give up money.
by Jeff 06/27/07 04:18 PM
It is amazing to me how stupid most of you are. You complain that you don't want to give up SOH then don't! You do not have to! Idiot 2nd home owners you are getting new protections now that you never had. Aka property taxes have a cap now.
by John 06/27/07 11:21 AM
bob, the sales tax plan would have returned the 2.5% collected sales tax to the counties that collected it. It's a good plan that would have solved many of FL's problems. Speaker Rubio had it right until the Democrats scuttled it.
by Travis 06/27/07 10:35 AM
Hey Lawrence my story sounds just like yours. I'd rather spend my money in South Carolina where they seem to welcome seasonal money instead of deter it. I'm done spending 4x the taxes of a homesteader and then spend even more money in their town.
by . 06/27/07 02:27 AM
I want more details on the revenue cap. I do not feel informed by the repeatitive quality of these articles. I get it. Give me details on the loopholes that the local politicians WILL try to slip through to raise taxes. I have 0 faith in PC/Clwt.
by . 06/27/07 02:25 AM
Point and match, Matt. I am really sick of non homesteaders whining. I sympathize but I have more sympathy for the young people trying to buy, families trying to buy their only home who can't because of taxes and ins. 2nd home=luxury=triaged.
by Bob 06/27/07 01:09 AM
The problem with the 2.5% sales tax proposal was that unless the counties were collecting it, then there were no guarantees the state would turn over the money. Do this: 8% sales tax, 4% for state, 4% for county, or in cities, 2% county, 2% city.
by DM 06/26/07 11:35 PM
Amazing how there is always someone who wants to see an income tax. Let me guess they don't think they have enough income to be taxed.I will agree to an income tax if it is regressive, meaning the tax starts at the first dollar of SS/Dividend/Income
by Matt 06/26/07 10:59 PM
They got it right. When you equally piss off both sides, then you are close to being fair.
by JJ 06/26/07 10:21 PM
To Native --it's called RICK BAKER soaking us dry.
by GrimReaper 06/26/07 10:11 PM
REMEMBER MILLAGE IF IT DOES NOT GO DOWN YOUR TAXES DO NOT GO DOWN GET ODD THE SOH CAP ITS NOT THE PROBLEM ! IF THEY PAY # TIMES AS MUCH YOUR NOT GOING TO GET A ONE CENT BREAK.... NOTE HOW MANY MANAGEMENT GOT AXED IN ST PETE ZIP ZERO .
by Lawrence 06/26/07 09:26 PM
I bought 3 years ago. My taxes went from $5000 to $17,000.I am in the process of selling at a huge loss and buying in South Carolina where there really is no discrepancy between homesteaders and seasoal residents.So long Florida and good riddance.
by Your Boss 06/26/07 08:17 PM
Does anyone that reads this paper have a job? I was considering advertising my business in this publication, but I am convinced the readers are broke, deadbeat, whiners. No thanks!
by bill 06/26/07 07:27 PM
glad to see that so many of my fellow floridians also see thru the bs of these pols. remember them at the next election!
by John 06/26/07 05:39 PM
This cut is clearly not enough. The Legislature needs to go back and come up with a better plan for property tax relief. How about a Speaker Rubio's simple tax relief plan, 2.5% sales tax increase for no property taxes? Easy, simple & effective!
by John 06/26/07 05:36 PM
Gary, the democrats & local fatcats block the best proposal. The one that eliminated property taxes for 2.5% more in sales tax. Parts of Tennessee has 9.5% sales tax & is flourishing. Ours would only be 8.5%. It's time to vote out these Democrats!
by GREG 06/26/07 05:26 PM
WAKE UP PEOPLE! THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE AND ARE PROBABLY LUCKY TO GET IT CONSIDERING OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT IS PAYING LOBBISTS TO FIGHT THIS TOOTH AND NAIL WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS. I AGREE THE TAX SWAP WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER BUT IF APPROVED A 50% RED IS GOOD
by Sally 06/26/07 05:16 PM
Good luck selling, Mel. Same plan here, but no one buying since the rates so unsure. I'd love to go somewhere cooler anyways!
by Walt 06/26/07 04:46 PM
It's ironic that the REAL opportunity to change taxes is at your City/County budget hearings each year. Typically there are 2 or 3 citizens in attendance at these things! Talahassee is NOT in a position to decide what's best for each locality!
by Mel 06/26/07 04:35 PM
Just waiting to graduate next summer with my Masters Degree, sell my property and leave FL. Say goodby to another nurse leaving the state>
by Shawna 06/26/07 03:57 PM
Do they really think the public is dumb enough to vote for a constitutional amendment that will bankrupt local governments in the short term, and leave homesteaders even worse off in the long run than they are now? How did they get it so wrong?
by Carol 06/26/07 03:50 PM
It is plain to see from the comments posted to this message that this public is not buying what they legislature is selling.
by Chuck 06/26/07 01:31 PM
I guess the editors don't want to put any comments in if it involves a State Income Tax?
by Chuck 06/26/07 01:29 PM
Mr.Anderson don't you think a State Income Tax would have been better?Would not have to be a Lawyer to see the results.
by G 06/26/07 01:18 PM
What about the people in the middle? This does nothing to help us. A simple solution would be $1.00 per sq ft; everyone pays the same, no exemptions. Politicians need to stop the waste, stop the scare tactics and do what we hired them to do.Enough!
by Gary 06/26/07 12:55 PM
Merely a bandaid as expected. This group of political morons need to be removed from office at the next election and replaced with differently motivated citizens. The answer was increase the sales tax and eliminate the property tax. They didn't hear!
by Dan 06/26/07 12:28 PM
He failed to mention the part where local politicos can raise your taxes as high as they want as long as a "supermajority" of politicos approves. Who thinks that won't happen every year? This plan offers no protection - I'm keeping SOH.
by Sally 06/26/07 12:17 PM
Eric is right--I purchased 5 years ago and taxes went from $4500 to $13500. Rolling to last year doesn't do me a lot of good. And my alley isn't even paved!
by Richard 06/26/07 11:58 AM
Vote NO on new tax system. They get you when you sell and then re buy. You have then go with the new system. It has no cap on amount of future increases. WOW!
by L 06/26/07 11:36 AM
What about portability? We lost our homestead when we bought a new home. This was real money is therea refund plan in the works or are we suchers again?
by John 06/26/07 11:28 AM
The vote in January will bring real and substantial change to our property tax system. It is incredible to me that Democrats are more interested in being political than actually helping our great State. I'm not really surprised by their ignorance.
by Warren 06/26/07 11:07 AM
Any change will only be temporary. The local governments will find ways, and loopholes, to bring RE taxes back to where they want them to be. Lots of talk by our governor and representatives. All have a Masters in BS.
by David 06/26/07 10:48 AM
And what happened to the 75% mandatory reduction in a homesteaded property? Some people own homes that, even after what we have now,pay nothing.Get rid of the Agricultural and Tree Farm GENEROUS exemptions. They alone could bring in billions.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT