News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Vandals wreak havoc at church
Religious leaders say graffiti left on the wall constitute a hate crime.
By JUSTIN GEORGE
Published June 27, 2007
TAMPA - The Council on American-Islamic Relations and other religious leaders came to the defense of the Apostolic Catholic Church after the church was broken into Saturday. Graffiti that religious leaders called a "hate crime" was scrawled on the wall.
In the small Sulphur Springs church, the front door was broken down, a small amount of money was stolen, picture frames were broken and this message was left: "Traitors Support Terrorist."
A detective has been assigned to determine if the case falls under the state's hate crime classification, which would enhance the penalty if someone is found guilty of the vandalism, police spokeswoman Laura McElroy said.
The church's leader, Bishop Chuck Leigh, has been outspoken on several issues involving local Muslims.
He advocated the release of former University of South Florida professor Sami Al-Arian during the federal trial accusing him of terrorism ties.
Leigh also spoke in support of giving all religions school holidays during a contentious Hillsborough County School Board school calendar discussion.
The church is part of an independent Catholic movement not affiliated with the Roman Catholic Church.
"An attack on any house of worship is like an attack on all houses of worship, " said Ahmed Bedier, CAIR-Tampa's executive director, who urged anyone with information on the vandalism to contact police.
Church members fixed the damage and painted over the graffiti before Sunday's service.
[Last modified June 27, 2007, 00:31:42]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by June
|
06/28/07 07:38 PM
|
|
Perhaps people have had enough since 9/11/01 and all the thwarted attempts by the "religion of peace" to kill more real Americans!
God, not allah, bless America!
|
|
by Eugene
|
06/28/07 05:56 AM
|
|
I see SPT has censored the post I made concerning CAIR. That really is of no surprise to me. I was posting what TV networks have been reporting, and what SPT is afraid to report.
|
|
by Bill
|
06/27/07 11:21 AM
|
|
I fail to see why this should be any more of a crime, then it would be if someone painted graffiti on a private residence. Certainly, both are crimes. But a crime against a building is a lot different than a crime against a person.
|