News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Raise city fees, Iorio urges
The council should consider hikes to offset tax reform losses, she says.
By JANET ZINK
Published June 28, 2007
TAMPA -- Mayor Pam Iorio is urging the City Council to consider increasing fees for such things as parks and recreation and fire rescue to make up for money lost because of state property tax reform.
That discussion with council members Wednesday came on the eve of today's announcement of a "significant" number of layoffs of city employees, also in response to property tax cuts.
On the revenue front, Iorio said she wanted the council to consider whether the fees should be increased. But she noted that already, the city's construction services division is working on a plan to increase its fees that could add $3-million a year to city coffers.
A draft report calls for increasing fees for plan review and permits by 10 percent for residential projects and 100 percent for commercial projects.
Meanwhile, at a 3 p.m. news conference today, Iorio will announce layoffs she said will cover most of the $20-million the city needs to cut from next year's proposed budget.
"We have been working on this for many months, and it is a painful process," Iorio said.
Property taxes make up about 40 percent of the city's general fund. Most of that fund goes to pay personnel expenses for nearly 3,700 employees, Iorio said.
"We need to shrink the organization," she said.
The positions targeted for layoffs have nothing to do with the performance of the people holding those jobs but what makes most sense for the city, she said.
Layoffs in the police and fire departments will not affect street-level service, she said.
Council member Joseph Caetano asked why, when people are losing jobs, the city continues with big expenses. He specifically asked why the city is considering buying land behind the troubled Trump Tower for the Riverwalk.
Iorio said purchasing park land is a one-time cost, and budget cuts need to be longer-term.
Council members John Dingfelder and Charlie Miranda said the board will do all it can to trim its budget this year. Miranda offered up his entire $3,400 allotment for travel and other spending.
"I'm not going anywhere," he said. "The council can cut $30,000 to $40,000 without blinking an eye."
Iorio also told the council that in the near future, members will need to decide whether they want to eliminate services or increase fees for parks programs, fire rescue and other services.
"It is a philosophical discussion," she said. The city recently floated, then rejected a plan to charge insurance companies fees for fire rescue response to accidents.
The construction services division is already working on a proposal that will be hashed out with the help of a 12-member committee of industry representatives, she said.
The goal is to make the construction services division self-sustaining, said Cyndy Miller, director of Growth Management and Development Services. Right now, department expenses are supplemented with more than $4-million from the city's general revenue fund. Even with the increases, she said, fees in Tampa would still be less than many other cities and counties in the area.
Joseph Narkiewicz, executive vice president of the Tampa Bay Builders Association, said it's too early to draw any conclusions about the suggested fee increases, but throughout the property tax debate he has been concerned that local governments would turn to the building industry to make up for revenue losses.
"This may be the beginning of that," he said.
He wondered whether city and county building services should be consolidated.
"We've talked about that over the years, but it's never gotten any traction. Now might be a good time to look at it," he said. "That might be a better long-term solution."
Tampa land use consultant Steve Michelini said increasing fees is "fine as long it's accompanied by more efficiency. It takes an inordinate amount of time to get through construction site reviews."
Miller said the division at this point has not been targeted for any personnel cuts.
Janet Zink can be reached at jzink@sptimes.com or (813) 226-3401.
[Last modified June 28, 2007, 00:14:23]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by John
|
06/30/07 12:58 AM
|
|
It's time to get rid of Pam Iorio. She needs to cut salaries and benefits that have ballooned in recent years.
Everyone must live within their means.
|
|
by Michael
|
06/28/07 04:37 PM
|
|
These are legislatively mandated cuts. Yes, revenue has increased but the citizens are at fault for asking for more services. You have your hand out for service but you want it for free. A government is not a business. It helps those that cannot pay.
|
|
by Rose
|
06/28/07 03:31 PM
|
|
If fees for new construction are increasing 100%, then they should have been raised a long time ago. What about impact fees? Start charging new business/residents for their fair share. These services were in place and they just walk in and use them.
|
|
by Rob
|
06/28/07 12:19 PM
|
|
How come government refuses to run a leaner organization. Private industry has figured out to lean their businesses to become more competitive. Government continues to operate in the fat cat mentality. They need to decrease middle management.
|
|
by susan
|
06/28/07 11:26 AM
|
|
Do you find it curious and ironic that the mayor feels cityō019s fiscal position so dire that she must layoff employees, cut services and hike rates to taxpaying citizens yet she announced her intention to acquire/purchase privately owned X-Trump tower
|
|
by Ray
|
06/28/07 11:12 AM
|
|
Nick - why do you say that? The legislature has mandated cuts, she is complying. What other choice does she have?
|
|
by Joe
|
06/28/07 10:29 AM
|
|
The last five years as excess taxes came in instead of putting the money aside or lowering the tax rate they spent it. Now they have to balance out the excess, not that complicated. They created the problem.
|
|
by Chris
|
06/28/07 09:22 AM
|
|
These people are ridiculous. The city's income went up 54 million from 06 to 07 and now they have to cut jobs/services and raise fees because they have to give less than 1/2 of that back?
Iorio should be ashamed- doubt she is though...........
|
|
by JB
|
06/28/07 08:56 AM
|
|
How about cutting back on expenses and frivolous spending first? Why is it that people have to lose their jobs first?
|
|
by Dan
|
06/28/07 08:03 AM
|
|
The problem is we want the cake and to eat it too. Thru all the years of excess the city should have been saving, instead of spending, now they have nothing to show for it. We wanted lower taxes, we got them but at what cost. WE LOSE either way.
|
|
by Lloyd
|
06/28/07 07:54 AM
|
|
I think the first layoff should be of Pam Iorio. Instead of increasing fees, she should be looking in her office for ways to cut expenses.
|
|
by nick
|
06/28/07 06:40 AM
|
|
I'd say that if the city has to lay off workers, then this administration should be thought of as a failure
|