St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

If city jobs go, so do services

Budget cuts that endanger 88 jobs may affect libraries and more.

By MIKE DONILA
Published June 29, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

CLEARWATER - The city is expected to cut about 88 city jobs next fiscal year, almost half of them in parks and recreation.

But this round of cuts would include no rank-and-file police officers or firefighters, officials say.

About half of the jobs targeted for the chopping block are currently filled. The cuts would save about $4.4-million in salaries and benefits, but would mean the loss of library hours, recreation centers and beautification projects.

Job losses would touch most departments, including the city manager's office, economic development, finance, planning, engineering, police and fire administration, and information technology.

The jobs that would be eliminated pay from $29, 000 to $140, 300 a year in salary and benefits.

The positions include public information officers, grant writers, assistants, managers, grounds crew members and mechanics. Roughly six management or supervisory positions will be cut, including a fire plans examiner and public works administrator.

City Council members will make the final decision on the proposed cuts this summer as they consider a budget for the 2007-08 fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1.

As a result of the reductions in staff, it could take city workers longer to handle requests for nonemergency work, Mayor Frank Hibbard said.

"Whenever you have fewer people working there will be more work for the other folks, so our response times will be lessened, " Hibbard said. "But with personnel being such a major portion of our budget, that's the only way to make meaningful cuts."

City Manager Bill Horne said the city will try to find new positions for the workers who lose their jobs.

But Human Resources director Joe Roseto said not everyone whose job would be eliminated would be placed in the same department or make the same salary as they do now.

Clearwater's cuts are on par with those proposed by other Tampa Bay area governments. Pinellas County is considering eliminating 48 jobs and 65 vacant slots. St. Petersburg may lay off 48 workers and eliminate another 22 unfilled jobs.

The cuts come as local governments wrestle with a new legislative mandate to push local property tax collections next year below this year's levels. How deep those cuts go is based on how much the governments' tax collections grew during the preceding five years.

Clearwater has to cut 7 percent, or about $3.7-million, compared with this year's property tax collections.

And the city will not collect another $2.3-million that it could have expected to take in during the 2007-08 fiscal year as property values increased.

Parks and Recreation director Kevin Dunbar said he's held a number of positions open since last fall, so he can move "as many people as possible" into them. But, he said, residents will see a difference in the services his department provides.

He said the beach will be cleaned less often, and library and recreation center hours will be reduced.

Stephen Sarnoff, president of a city-employee union, said he doesn't believe residents realize what is happening.

"It's bad because all those jobs represent services that we provide ... so citizens and visitors won't get the same services, " said Sarnoff, president of Communications Workers of America Local 3179.

To prepare for new state-mandated cuts, the city in recent months has identified $7.5-million in overall savings, so it's ahead of the curve. That means there's a chance some jobs could be saved.

For example, city officials have decided not to cut a seven-member Fire Department squad that performs heavy-duty excavation rescues.

And the city's fiscal year 2007-08 spending plan includes funding for four school resource officers - jobs that were recently in jeopardy.

City and school leaders plan to meet in July to figure out how to pay for the program.

The city does plan to eliminate its Officer Friendly program, allowing it to reassign two officers who now meet with students and neighborhood groups to promote safety.

The city, under a soft hiring freeze since January, has about 1, 750 full-time and 80 part-time positions currently filled.

Horne promised that no rank-and-file police officers or firefighters would be laid off now, but that could change if voters in January approve the state's proposed super homestead exemptions, which would cut into property tax revenue even further.

"I don't see how we couldn't do that when police and fire represent 49 percent of our general fund, " he said. "But my policy is to do all I can to avoid it."

Mike Donila can be reached at mdonila@sptimes.com or 445-4160.

Fast Facts:

What's next

Within days, the City Council will get a copy of Clearwater's preliminary budget for fiscal year 2007-08, which begins Oct. 1. Members will hold a budget workshop July 16 to discuss what changes, if any, to make to the annual spending plan. So far, the administration has identified roughly $7.5-million in savings and targeted about 88 full-time jobs for the chopping block.

[Last modified June 28, 2007, 22:27:14]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Hank 07/02/07 07:32 AM
Save on salaries by getting rid of fire chiefs. Doing a time study will support their terminations. Geer and his idiots are not only ineffective, but harmful to the citizens. Volunteer tactics will leave a stain in Clearwater for years to come.
by John 07/01/07 03:06 PM
Cut or freeze salaries & benefits, keep most services. Salaries have ballooned the past few years. Very easy imo.
by Robbie 06/30/07 09:48 AM
No positions are lost, but taking the Officers out of the schools just means an increase in dispatching one back to handle issues and at a greater delay
by Robbie 06/30/07 09:40 AM
Clearwater needs to take a lesson from Tampa, cut out a bunch of useless directors, Chiefs and Managers, and forget the working stiffs pension, check the numbers it's not as grand as it seems, and most don't collect very long or very much
by Gb 06/29/07 09:47 PM
Actually, how about we just annex downtown and let the Co$ have it, they own it all anyway. They can upkeep their roads, beautify their sidewalks, and charge more for their religion to pay for it all.
by Gb 06/29/07 09:45 PM
BOAT SLIPS! Beautification projects? How about doing them once, right the first time. Would that cut that by half? How much $ can you bring by enforcing the Co$ to pay fines from code violations of the SP building? It's only a few years overdue.
by Mike 06/29/07 05:54 PM
Mr. Sarnoff holds the magic wand that could fix the entire budget crisis with one wave. Just give back some of the inflated compensation gains given to your union during the bonanza days. Tighten your belt - like everyone else -and problem solved.
by GeorgeB 06/29/07 11:01 AM
Swell,we need a 9 million dollar marina over everything else?These Council memebers are inadequate and surely at a minimum they are quacks.We need to recall them out of office and put in people that want garbage,fire police and parks.Kill the marina!
by Bill 06/29/07 10:48 AM
As for the beach being cleaned hire high school kids to clean it as a job for the summer. I had one like this where I live way back when.
by JT 06/29/07 10:05 AM
Mr.Sarnoff we cannot afford better service.Perhaps developers and Ritzy Hotel folks can foot the bill on behalf of their rich visitors. If not then CUT CUT CUT. You just don't get it people cannot afford as much property tax a cut in union dues it is
by Jim 06/29/07 09:36 AM
The waste at the Long Center alone could cover three positions. So much unnecessary spending . . . how do you justify having 5 park dept employees "watch" one employee do the work? Park Dept at Long Center could do with less employees for sure.
by Jim 06/29/07 08:45 AM
We continue to stick with the old model of fire protection based on volunteer departments. There is no true need for them to work 24 on and 48 off any longer. Construction costs alone for fire stations would be huge savings.
by Wallace 06/29/07 06:58 AM
"Job losses would touch most departments, including fire administration." But are city officials going to cut the right positions from fire admin? There are approx 16 chiefs today. Just a few yrs ago, approx 5 chiefs ran the dept and did just as much
by Lawrence 06/29/07 06:39 AM
Where are the salary and benefit reductions? Where are the negotiations with the greedy unions to give up some of the windfall in compensation? So many fiascoes by this clueless City Council, but still they say, "keep our pay, cut your services".
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT