News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Commission's Blair all wet
By A TIMES EDITORIAL
Published June 30, 2007
|
Hillsborough County Commissioner Brian Blair's house, left, sits on Noreast Lake.
|
 |
|
[Ken Helle | Times]
|
For Hillsborough County Commissioner Brian Blair, wetlands protection is an issue that hits close to home. As in, the lake behind his house. Blair prodded the county to clean up his lake even though he later took the lead to kill local wetlands protections, calling them a waste of money and a senseless hurdle for developers. Take your pick which is worse - his abuse of power or hypocrisy. This is a man the entire board put in charge of its Environmental Protection Commission. The Times' Michael Van Sickler reported last Saturday how Blair had pushed the county to clean up the secluded, private Noreast Lake since months before he won election in 2004. Blair didn't let up after taking his seat on the board that oversaw the very staff he called into action. He blamed a county drainage project for polluting the lake, even though at least three reports contradicted that claim or that nearby lakes had suffered lower water quality. Blair and the staff deny any coercion took place. But as the public works director said: "You'd have to be deaf and blind not to feel some pressure." Since February 2005, the Times reported, a few months after Blair won election, county work crews have spent more hours at Noreast than any of Hillsborough's 229 other lakes. Blair has not abstained from voting on Noreast improvements, thanks to legal advice by the county attorney who works directly for the board. The staff labored to accommodate him even though the reports found no evidence linking Noreast's condition to the drainage project. Even now, between $673, 000 and $985, 000 is planned for cleaning up Noreast and nearby lakes, even though one consultant who studied the issue said the area lakes are "doing fine" and "I don't think you have that much of a problem." The timing couldn't be more embarrassing to Blair. He recently joined the 4-3 majority in a preliminary vote to kill the county's wetlands protection program. Wetlands are the natural filters that protect communities from flooding and water bodies from pollution. Blair, in other words, insists those circumstances harmed his lake, yet he moves to disband the very agency he and others rely on for help. Even those who give his ethics a pass must wonder about Blair's ability to connect the policy dots.
[Last modified June 29, 2007, 22:23:22]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Susan
|
07/01/07 06:23 AM
|
|
We all have concerns about the environment. Saving the wetland division is the priority. The timing is crucial for many critical decisions in the county. We want the same attention to our area that Blair received.
|
|
by Joe
|
06/30/07 10:32 PM
|
|
Is this was really about cutting government spending then this (EPC Wetlands) would be the LAST place to cut. Protecting wetlands saves the county millions in stormwater costs, water quality, and is essential to fishing and other industries.
|
|
by Jennifer
|
06/30/07 08:46 PM
|
|
He was a BUMBLEE WRESTLER with no background or expertise in the crucial matters he now handles. Either expectations for those who voted for him were nonexistent, or powerful people needed a puppet. Either way, our county loses.
|
|
by Dave
|
06/30/07 11:58 AM
|
|
Our local politicans are scumbags who bow before developers while everyone lines their pockets with extra money.
Meanwhile, the quality of life continues to deteriorate while these jackasses permit another mega-division.
|
|
by Ken
|
06/30/07 09:56 AM
|
|
Wrong, David - after deducting fees collected, the cost of the EPC is just about what Blair wants spent on his little pond. I agree, there ought to be an investigation to see if there is any wrongdoing, and clear up any questions of propriety.
|
|
by Jose
|
06/30/07 09:12 AM
|
|
A developer named David has told county staff "I have five commissioners in my pocket on a bad day" - Blair and the others are using tax cuts as a weak cover to do the developers bidding, and there needs to be an investigation to know why.
|
|
by David
|
06/30/07 08:21 AM
|
|
Leave the guy alone. First he along with the other commissioners are required to cut 80M from the budget and then you jump all over him when he votes to cut expenses. Eliminating the EPC will save our county millions being spent by county governmen
|
|
by Carl
|
06/30/07 07:05 AM
|
|
Why does everyone have to give into contractors determined to cover every piece of wetland that gets in their way. How do these people get elected to positions regarding ecology when they have no interest or want to contractors everything they want?
|
|