News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
New school plan has promise
By By Liam Julian, Special to the Times
Published June 30, 2007
After 35 years of busing to achieve racially integrated classrooms, Pinellas County's new pupil assignment plan will make its schools much more racially monolithic. And now that the Supreme Court has ruled against Louisville's and Seattle's assignment plans - which take into account race when placing students in classrooms - the racial shift in schools, from St. Petersburg to Tarpon Springs (and across the country), will be cemented.
Such will be a drastic change, and one that has lots of folks pretty anxious. Even those who support removing racial considerations from classroom assignments are unsure about what a return to neighborhood schooling will mean.
And nobody knows how quickly the plan should be implemented: too quickly and many students will be hastily removed from their current schools, too slowly and the district will have to wait on the millions of dollars from saved busing costs.
It's right and necessary to ponder such questions. But residents shouldn't worry too much. Pinellas County's new school assignment plan will be one of neighborhood-based parental choice, a solid structure that has the potential to improve education for all students. It will free the school district to focus time and effort not on assigning youngsters to schools, but on academic achievement.
It's worth noting that while Pinellas' classrooms may have been racially integrated, they weren't academically so. The achievement data tell the story: In 2005-2006, 72 percent of Pinellas County's white students scored at or above proficient on state tests in math, but only 33 percent of black students did. In reading, 65 percent of white students hit the mark; again, only 33 percent of black students did.
Those test scores highlight the striking achievement gap that 35 years of busing did nothing to resolve. And that type of segregation, between the academic performance of white and black students, is far more worrisome than classrooms that don't conform to specific racial proportions.
Most parents in Pinellas County believe that, too. On surveys conducted by the school system, parents responded that they were less interested in having racially integrated schools than in having good schools in their neighborhoods.
The school system listened, and its new school assignment plan is a hybrid that allows parents some choices, while also emphasizing neighborhood schooling. The plan lays out attendance areas (eight for elementary, four for middle and two for high), and each school within the areas is surrounded by a zone. Students are assigned to schools in their neighborhood zone, but they are also eligible to apply for schools (fundamental schools, schools with magnet programs) outside the zone.
Superintendent Clayton Wilcox recently told the St. Petersburg Times editorial board that he wants to increase the number of fundamental schools. He also expects to save millions of dollars in busing costs and wants to reinvest that money in classrooms. Wilcox would lower class sizes and experiment with an incentive-pay program for teachers - one that would give pay raises to teachers who work at schools with large populations of poor students.
And such schools, with large populations of poor students, will receive more money than schools enrolling affluent students - i.e., school funding would be equitable, not equal.
Wilcox is mostly right about how to allocate dollars to schools, but there's an even better way: Instead of funding individual schools, the district should fund individual students.
Meet Johnny and Jane, who both attend public schools in Pinellas County. Johnny has stellar test scores and has shown steady academic improvement from year to year. Jane, though, has struggled in school, and she's making hardly any progress from one grade to the next.
The district could calculate, based on each student's individual needs, how many education dollars they require. By tying those dollars to individual students - i.e., Jane brings, say, $9, 000 per year to her school, while Johnny might only bring $5, 000 - Pinellas County would create a truly equitable system for funding its schools. Some cities (Houston and Edmonton are examples) have already implemented weighted student funding and seen positive results.
Pinellas has a chance to remake its school system, and the signs are so far promising. Developing lots of good, public schools is easier said than done. But the district is acting on the desires of parents, and it's developing a public school system that will offer both quality and choice. That's a good thing for Pinellas County students - no matter their race.
Liam Julian is a St. Petersburg native and a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.
[Last modified June 30, 2007, 09:40:25]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by to MK
|
07/02/07 03:49 PM
|
|
The diff is that the family of the $100/head kid isn't going to sue the school district because $100/head kid can't read.
|
|
by DM
|
06/30/07 10:30 PM
|
|
As a parent I make educational achievement a priority in our home. We pay $7,800 in property tax a year. A large percentage of this is School taxes. Hell no you are not going to take more of my money and spend it on another child and less on mine.
|
|
by Doy
|
06/30/07 09:00 PM
|
|
If Johnny is continually showing progress and testing well how is he being left behind? Kids know nothing of the money they bring to schools, they know their grades and tests. The kid failing needs more help and therefore more money. Common sense.
|
|
by MK
|
06/30/07 08:13 PM
|
|
hmm...$100 per head for good FCAT scores vs. $4000 per kid who doesn't improve...Anybody see a conflict here? What's the positive side for the bright kids & families who work hard outside the classroom to help their kids improve?
|
|
by Maria
|
06/30/07 07:05 PM
|
|
We played by the rules and went through the choice process. Now they're changing the rules mid-stream. Let our kids stay in their schools! Don't give them busing, just like the fundamental. Don't punish them for a flawed choice plan.
|
|
by Nikki
|
06/30/07 07:04 PM
|
|
Where are the facts and figures of this proposal? It is being implemented too quickly -- choice isn't great but this plan appears to have flaws too. Slow, down, do your homework and make this a plan that works for all students in the county.
|
|
by Debbie
|
06/30/07 07:02 PM
|
|
The program give us a choice!! My child is happy in her "choice" school and wants to finish her 3rd, 4th, and 5th grades there. Give her the choice to finish with her friends, her teachers. Don't take away the choice we already have made!
|
|
by Linda
|
06/30/07 07:01 PM
|
|
If parents want kids to go to neighborhood schools why have so many people chosen schools OUTSIDE of their neighborhoods. Let our kids stay put. You gave us choice; let our kids finish out in their "choice" schools.
|
|
by Fran
|
06/30/07 05:05 PM
|
|
Choice is not the reason for the achievement gap. Until the black community owns the problem instead of blaming others for it, the gap will never be closed. Step up NAACP and and follow Cosby's lead. Education is more important than Nike shoes.
|
|
by TJ
|
06/30/07 03:59 PM
|
|
The numbers say it all. Student scores are NOT improving in our current structure. Maybe the issues have less to do with school performance and more to do with family responsibility. Strong families will create strong schools.
|
|
by Ann
|
06/30/07 03:57 PM
|
|
Great article! These are top-notch ideas!
|
|
by kandlesbykathryn
|
06/30/07 03:10 PM
|
|
It's unreal that this took so much time to realize the failure of the choice program...
|
|
by Kathy
|
06/30/07 12:34 PM
|
|
If it's TRULY a neighborhood based parental CHOICE how does it remove the need to focus time & effort on assigning kids? It just gives LESS Choice. Residents should be worried. It's the same mess, different lines on the map. Not an improvement!
|
|
by Machon
|
06/30/07 12:28 PM
|
|
Sounds ok in THEORY but until my neighborhood school is EQUAL in academics AND environment leave my kids where I CHOSE AND YOU PUT THEM. Nothing's equitable in yanking kids from good schools & putting them in inferior ones.
|
|
by Bria
|
06/30/07 12:25 PM
|
|
Fundamental/magnets are full. Kids don't give up those seats. So it's NOT an option for kids who get moved. It's ONLY an option for new K. 6th & 9th grade spots are given to lower level fund/magnet kids moving up. The plan is MISLEADING at best.
|
|
by John
|
06/30/07 12:14 PM
|
|
Kids should be able to STAY in the CHOICE schools they were given. If busing is prohibitive let parents choose to provide transportation before kids are "hastily removed" from their schools. W/100,000 kids in PCS nothing should be done Hastily!
|
|
by Machon
|
06/30/07 12:06 PM
|
|
Julian must not have actually read the new plan. It doesn't give parents free choice of schools in the new areas. If it did all current Choice problems would still exist as the new areas are big enough to still require busing.
|
|
by JT
|
06/30/07 11:33 AM
|
|
NO NO NO. Stop this madness. Social architecture is not your strong point Wilcox. Every child deserves equal, period. Otherwise let taxpayer funding stay wholly in the area schools from which it comes.You are going to split the county if this is done
|
|
by Julie
|
06/30/07 11:09 AM
|
|
Let our kids stay put! Grandfather all of them in !
|
|
by Nikki
|
06/30/07 11:08 AM
|
|
It is not fair to yank our kids out of their schools. Let kids who are already in the system as of Aug. 2007 stay put! Don't provide those who want to stay with transportation. That takes away the biggest argument for change!
|
|
by Bill
|
06/30/07 11:06 AM
|
|
Grandfather in ALL of our children who are enrolled in the school under the old choice program. Save money by not providing busing for those students (just like the fundamental school).
|
|
by Greg
|
06/30/07 10:03 AM
|
|
It sounds to me like Johnny's being left behind. It also looks like a school wanting more funding could encourage more students to be like Jane. Don't punish Johnny, and the potential Johnny's, because they're bright.
|