News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Growls greet law
Owners of exotic animals says they were ambushed by the requirement for insurance.
By S.I. ROSENBAUM
Published July 1, 2007
|
Casper, a six-year-old lion sits in the shade at Elmira's Wildlife Sanctuary in Wimauma. Exotic-animal owners in the Tampa Bay area are howling mad about a pending bill that would force them to carry a large insurance policy or post a large bond in case their animals escape or injure someone.
|
 |
|
[Times photo: Skip O'Rourke]
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Times photo: Skip O'Rourke]
Kelley the tiger hangs out in a grassy pen at Elmira's Wildlife Sanctuary.
|
|
WIMAUMA - It takes a lot of chicken to keep three lions, four tigers, three bears and a dozen leopards happy. And all that chicken isn't cheap. So when Robin Greenwood of Elmira's Wildlife Sanctuary learned that new legislation would require her to put up $10,000 or buy $2-million of insurance in order to keep her beasts, she was upset. "Ten thousand dollars is a very large sum for a sanctuary struggling just to keep the animals fed," Greenwood said.
The bill, which became law on Friday, came as a surprise to exotic-animal exhibitors -- many of whom say it will impose a financial hardship. Last week, rumors were swirling about the legislation's origin.
Could an animal-rights group such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals have lobbied for it?
"Animal-rights activists believe working animals is a sin," said Larry AllenDean, a tiger trainer based in Orlando. "It's coming from one of these highly organized outfits."
A PETA spokeswoman said that while the organization supports the new law, the group didn't lobby for it.
It's hard to find anyone who will take responsibility for the new law.
Senate Bill 2766 was sponsored by Sen. Bill Posey, R-Rockledge.
But Posey said his bill was meant to affect only reptile owners, not exotic-mammal exhibitors or trainers. The amendment concerning mammals was added at the last minute by Sen. JD Alexander, R-Lake Wales, Posey said.
Capt. John West of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission also said the amendment came from Alexander.
"I was surprised because he never talked to me about it, just put it on my bill," Posey said.
Alexander didn't return calls seeking comment. An aide, Rachel Barnes, said Alexander supported the amendment but didn't propose it.
Rather, Sen. Michael S. Bennett, R-Bradenton did, at Alexander's request, she said. Bennett's name is listed with the amendment on the Senate's Web site.
"I don't remember why we did that," Bennett said. "Somebody asked me to put that on but I don't know why."
Asked if PETA could have lobbied for the amendment, Bennett scoffed.
"If it had been PETA, I would never have offered it," he said. "I shoot animals and eat them, okay?"
Regardless of the legislation's origin, animal exhibitors will now have to live with it.
At least one exhibitor said she welcomes the new law.
"We're very excited about this new provision," said Carole Baskin of Tampa's Big Cat Rescue.
"We think it's a long time coming." The money will force "roadside zoos and pseudo-sanctuaries" to take more responsibility for their charges, she said.
The law is intended to provide some liability coverage in case an animal endangers others or causes property damage.
But others are angry.
"I can't afford it," said Gloria Johnson, proprietor of Cougar Ridge Education Center in Havana. "I don't happen to have $10,000 laying around."
The wildlife commission is "working on what we can accept" in lieu of $10,000 cash, West said. He's considering everything from bonds to certificates of deposit and letters of credit.
"It will be different for everybody depending on [their] financial situation," he said.
The commission also have to determine what kind of violation will mean forfeiting $10,000.
Meanwhile, he said he has been inundated with calls from concerned animal exhibitors.
"The majority are not happy," he said. "What can I tell them? This is the law."
S.I. Rosenbaum can be reached at (813) 661-2442 or srosenbaum@sptimes.com.
[Last modified June 30, 2007, 21:19:01]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Andrea
|
09/14/07 11:28 AM
|
|
I agree that Senator Alexander ABUSED his power for a friend. Animal control should be trying to get dangerous animals off out streets not hindering people who are responsible and helping many animals (wild or domestic)trying to survive.
|
|
by Diane
|
07/11/07 02:18 PM
|
|
Senator Alexander ABUSED his power as a senator and put this on the bill for a friend of his. Is THIS what we have to look forward to from this Senate? He should be removed from office.
|
|
by U. Lie
|
07/09/07 04:42 PM
|
|
Do not believe the false statistics printed here by Carole. Read here.
http://www.rexano.org/ARFalseDataFrame.htm
|
|
by Kitty
|
07/06/07 05:17 PM
|
|
Are we to assume that Fl Fish & Game will confiscate ALL of the Class 1 animals whose owners cannot afford these absurd fees? Or will they just appear at random to perform euthanasia?
That should play well on the 6 o'clock news!
|
|
by Robin
|
07/04/07 02:15 PM
|
|
I have mixed feelings about this bill-I understand the concern but you have a much better chance of being attacked by the pitbull or the kid with the brick than being attacked by Casper. But the way the bill was done is sneaky, underhanded and nasty.
|
|
by Scott
|
07/03/07 05:22 PM
|
|
Carole you statistics are greatly exagerrated and inaccurate for the country and Florida. I am appalled by the underhanded fashion this amendment was passed. Is this how other bills become law? Plese contact the Governor and voice you displeasure.
|
|
by Tereasa
|
07/03/07 04:48 PM
|
|
IF YOU ARE WILD ABOUT CATS check out Wildlife On Easy Street at their new address: http://bigcatrescue.org/ Meet our 100 wildcats, join our membership or volunteer program and learn about exotic cats and more. To help fund this much needed Sanctuary
|
|
by Virginia
|
07/03/07 09:54 AM
|
|
Whether or not you believe in private ownership of exotics, as Americans we should be appalled that these unscrupulous senators passed a law in such an underhanded fashion. It makes a mockery of the whole legislative process. Shame on these senators!
|
|
by Victoria
|
07/02/07 09:03 PM
|
|
Carole is an exhibitor making money off her animals, many times thru deceit. Of course, she wants fellow owners banned from ownership. Contact those who supported this and voice your displeasure. Vote against those legislators that betrayed us.
|
|
by K
|
07/02/07 03:57 PM
|
|
Carole - your statistics are not accurate an do not reflect Florida statistics - florida is an extremely safe state - this also effects monkeys, bears etc business and sanctuary's - in florida all class 1 have to exhibit these animals
|
|
by Jan
|
07/02/07 08:17 AM
|
|
posey.bill.web@ flsenate.gov Write to Posey and let him know he should protest his law being changed without his knowledge. Let him know what you think of this law and the way it was sneaked in.
|
|
by Mary
|
07/01/07 06:52 PM
|
|
First I can't understand that when the amendment was signed one except Alexander wants to take responsiblity for it. I hope they are happy when many exotic animals lose their home and end up either in canned hunts, bad places or euthanized.
|
|
by Bill
|
07/01/07 06:50 PM
|
|
MS Baskin seems to be the only Class 1 owner happy about this law. In my opinion it's because she wants all the sanctuaries to close down so she can be the only one. Her sancuartary is the biggest psuedo-sanctuary in Florida and that's my opinion.
|
|
by Cassie
|
07/01/07 06:47 PM
|
|
The only owner of Class 1 animals is happy about this new law is Carole Lewis Baskin whom anyone in the animal community is the speaker for a variety of animal rights groups to push this through and she can afford it. She is a millionaire.
|
|
by Mary
|
07/01/07 06:44 PM
|
|
I do not own exotic animals and I am very angry that the amendment which may affect the welfre of so many animals was so carelessly added. From the article it sounds like the only one who wanted it was Alexander and other just followed shame on you.
|
|
by Ken
|
07/01/07 06:19 PM
|
|
Even if some of the idea is good, the sneaky way it became law demonstrates the worst in our legal system. Nobody even knew what the heck was in the bill they voted for except for the guy who weaseled something in.
|
|
by BOB
|
07/01/07 01:36 PM
|
|
How about adopting a law to cover these out of control teens they should have the parents get insurance for them because they seem to get in trouble more than these wild animals like then
young kid who beat the homeless man with a brick
|
|
by A
|
07/01/07 11:55 AM
|
|
When animals attack humans, it's just retribution for taking their land.
|
|
by Jamie
|
07/01/07 11:51 AM
|
|
Yes, this is a good law. I have extra insurance for my German Shepherd, why shouldn't you for your tiger? Maybe we'll see the end of people who have no right owning these animals.
|
|
by susan
|
07/01/07 11:34 AM
|
|
here we go again.
|
|
by Marilyn
|
07/01/07 11:13 AM
|
|
If animal exhibitors were "true" sanctuaries, this liability coverage would not have been necessary. Exhibitors of wild animals endanger the public and must be held accountable. Why they are allowed to have wild animals is beyond comprehension.
|
|
by Lesley
|
07/01/07 09:54 AM
|
|
Your headline reads "Companions, Not Dinner." I find that ironic because as eloquent an advocate you are of the animals, you display nothing but disdain for the baby humans. Why not a headline that reads "Children --Not Discards." Humane to humans.
|
|
by Cat
|
07/01/07 09:49 AM
|
|
Of course Carol Baskin welcomes the law. Big Cat has a multi million dollar budget, an army of volunteers and connections to veternary schools and clinics. $10,000 is probably not a problem...
|
|
by Judith
|
07/01/07 09:24 AM
|
|
who is reading the bills before they vote on them? Who is
minding OUR store.. We elect people who
are supposed to READ what they vote on
apparently that is not happening. This
is a perfect example of it.
|
|
by Carole
|
07/01/07 09:00 AM
|
|
There have been(811) of incidents involving captive big cats since 1990. These incidents have resulted in the killing or deaths of 236 big cats, 74 human deaths, more than 253 human maulings, 214 exotic cat escapes & 366 confiscations. Its a good law
|
|
by Tarus Bulba
|
07/01/07 08:35 AM
|
|
Jeff is uninformed
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
07/01/07 08:17 AM
|
|
Senator Bennett sounds like a real winner - He "doesn't remember" and he "doesn't know why" he sponsored the law. Also sounds like he's quite proud of his bubba skills at killing wildlife. Great choice, Bradenton!
|
|
by Stephen
|
07/01/07 08:01 AM
|
|
Dogs are not same thing as a wild animal. Listen we all want responsible owners. By the most part I bet most are. Its the people who let animals go (like the snake problem in the Everglades) and don't take care of them that are the problem.
|
|
by Jeff
|
07/01/07 06:06 AM
|
|
They should adopt a similar law for owners of pit bulls.
|