St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Big rebuff of beach access

Pinellas has spent almost $3-million and can't get a deal on parking.

By WILL VAN SANT
Published July 3, 2007


A skateboarder passes two properties Pinellas County bought for beach parking in Indian Rocks Beach for $2.8-million in Penny for Pinellas money.
photo
[Times photo: Jim Damaske]
ADVERTISEMENT

INDIAN ROCKS BEACH - A standoff between this coastal town and Pinellas County over beach access could doom a nearly $3-million investment of taxpayer money.

Eighteen months after buying two parcels for parking lots, the county faces the prospect of having to sell the property in a stagnant market because Indian Rocks leaders refuse to endorse the plan.

The ill-fated deal has its roots in the leadup to March's Penny for Pinellas referendum.

County leaders realized in January 2006 - 14 months before a vote would be held on extending the 1-cent sales tax until 2020 - that not a single beach access project had been completed.

Voters had repeatedly said in Penny focus groups that their top priority was more access to the beach.

So that month, when two Indian Rocks Beach parcels on the east side of Gulf Boulevard were up for sale, the county jumped, spending $2.8-million in Penny cash for 0.8 acres between 23rd and 24th avenues.

The county failed to secure promises from Indian Rocks to grant the land use changes that would be needed to build parking lots on the parcels, which were home to a gasoline station and a small strip of businesses.

The Penny easily passed in March. But the public still has no additional beach access.

"We were under the gun, trying to follow through on our promises for Penny for Pinellas, " said County Commissioner Karen Seel, one of two commissioners who voted against the purchase. "There was just a lot of pressure."

Seel said she objected because Indian Rocks' commitment was unclear, the beach town had plenty of public parking and the cost was too high. The roughly 60 parking spaces would go for about $46, 667 each.

"I just felt like it was a huge price tag, " Seel said.

The county had been in the hunt for beach access opportunities since 2005. The way Pinellas officials remember it, Indian Rocks approached the county regarding the parcels and gave no indication they would balk at what was planned. "I don't recall hearing any objection or negative comment, " said County Administrator Steve Spratt.

Indian Rocks Mayor Bill Ockunzzi remembers differently. Ockunzzi said the city was clear its preference was for acquisition of vacant land on the west, or beach side, of Gulf Boulevard.

In a letter sent a month before the purchase, then-City Manager Al Grieshaber asked then-County Commission Chairman John Morroni to place emphasis on "purchasing vacant gulf front property in lieu of existing businesses and business property."

"They didn't listen, " Ockunzzi said. "We found out these parcels were under contract, " within days before the County Commission voted.

Ockunzzi said city leaders have no interest in allowing the county to replace viable business property with parking lots.

Shortly after the purchase, the county spent $17, 600 to demolish the gas station, lay sod and erect fencing at the site. By the end of 2007, another $25, 000 will be spent to demolish the business strip and determine whether asbestos is present.

If asbestos is found, which is likely, another $25, 000 will be needed for cleanup.

County and Indian Rocks officials are still trying to reach some sort of compromise, but if the dispute can't be resolved, the parcels will be put on the market.

From 2005 to 2006, property values in Indian Rocks Beach leaped 30.8 percent. From last year to this, they dropped 0.7 percent. On Monday, a 15-block stretch of Gulf Boulevard north of the county's parcels had 12 residences or vacant lots for sale.

"I hope we can come out whole, " Seel said. "But I think we bought that property at a premium."

Spratt, the county administrator, said opportunities to secure affordable beach access are rare and commitments must often be made quickly. He said the deal was given sufficient scrutiny before money was committed.

"At this point I don't believe there is a lost, stranded investment, " Spratt said. "It will still be put to use for the public's benefit, one way or another."

Will Van Sant can be reached at vansant@sptimes.com or 727 445-4166.

[Last modified July 3, 2007, 00:24:58]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by John 07/04/07 12:34 AM
How many more of these projects do we have to find out about? Money really squandered. 1st rule of purchase is check to see if zoning is okay before putting money down. What a waste of our money. And these morons think public can't vote on Booker Ck
by Cindy 07/03/07 03:36 PM
We are forgetting that tourism from natural beauty is our biggest industry. We are destroying our beaches. Clearwater beach is a growth disaster until 2009. Now there are problems in Indian Rocks. Some agency needs to protect our beach resources!
by Dave 07/03/07 12:41 PM
More broken promises.
by Steve 07/03/07 12:10 PM
Here is an idea when needs fund for beach dredging and the sand that comes from simply say no. You cannot have it both ways taking money to replace sand but not working with the public on access.
by Terry Leary 07/03/07 11:10 AM
Do not sell, we need green space, make a small park with parking.
by JT 07/03/07 10:35 AM
There are those of us who already have a high property tax bill who saw the Penny as everyone getting to pitch in for the spending everyone seems to adore. At least now the Commission is wasting your money as well as mine and we can both be mad!!!
by Bland 07/03/07 10:15 AM
I grew up on IRB. Originally, Publix wanted to build on this parcel but the referendum was voted down. Concern was the business would ruin the character of the beach. FYI, ever since the first condo was built the character of the beach was ruined.
by Barbara 07/03/07 10:03 AM
It would be stupid for them to sell the property now and compound the problem by loosing money in this market.
by bill 07/03/07 09:57 AM
This comes from having too much money and not enough sense. Pun intended.
by JA 07/03/07 09:54 AM
No wonder the government needs to keep stealing money from us with inflated property taxes otherwise how would they fund their ridiculous inflated worthless purchases?
by K 07/03/07 09:47 AM
Nex time, just light the $3m on fire - what a waste! What about dredging some of canals that are silting in, in Riviera Bay. Folks are paying for water access with no real access!
by AJ 07/03/07 09:25 AM
Wait a minute! Indian Rocks Beach is the villian here. They give land use changes for every million dollar condo tower proposed, but not for public parking? Why? Because condos rake in tax dollars and the heck with the public.
by Moustache Peet 07/03/07 07:26 AM
Was there denial when some said "they spent like drunken sailors". We begged you not to pass that penny as it was spent friviously in the past. But noooo you dummies let them have it again. Hey "trust me" sound familiar.
by Dee 07/03/07 07:06 AM
Looks like the county commissioners yet again did a thorough job of due diligence. I'm so glad we elected these people. Next election let's remember their actions and give them their just due.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT