News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Military fails to deliver for wounded veterans
A Times Editorial
Published July 6, 2007
The cliche "adding insult to injury" has taken on new meaning at Walter Reed National Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., the Army's premier medical center on the U.S. East Coast.
Earlier this year, Washington Post reporters Dana Priest and Anne Hull uncovered serious problems in the long-term care of wounded war veterans at the facility, especially substandard living conditions and excessive red tape. The disclosures resulted in congressional hearings and a shake-up of top brass.
Now, the Army acknowledges that hospital staff had discovered about 4, 500 pieces of mail intended for troops that had been lost for as long as a year. Some of the lost mail, including letters, postcards, magazines and packages, was postmarked as far back as May 2006. Embarrassed by this disclosure, Maj. Gen. Eric Schoomaker, the medical center's commanding general, ordered the mail be hand-delivered immediately to soldiers still at Walter Reed, while other items would be sent by Priority Mail to troops who had been released. Still other items would be returned to sender.
Schoomaker also ordered a full investigation into the foul-up, and he fired the mail room's contract operator.
While these are welcome moves, military officers, enlisted staff and civilian contractors should never again discount the significance of "mail call" for the welfare of the troops, especially for those at Walter Reed, many of whom have lost limbs or sustained brain damage. For most of the war wounded, simple letters, postcards and packages are their only contact with their relatives, sweethearts, friends and the civilian lifestyles they gave up to serve their country.
[Last modified July 5, 2007, 21:56:13]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by VietnamVeteran
|
07/07/07 02:00 AM
|
|
I was astounded by the ridiculous remark by jg. The fact it has happened in the past does not make it right. Stop watching Fox news, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly and get the truth from other news sources.
|
|
by Bud
|
07/06/07 04:43 PM
|
|
It was wrong for burecrats in the VA to get several thousand dollars in "bonus" money when there is a need for everything in the system. Look at the Generals and leaders--that's where the blame belongs.
|
|
by Phil
|
07/06/07 01:58 PM
|
|
George Duuhhbyaa Bush in the Commander in Theif of the Army. There should be no surprises in the way he has the Army treat veterans. And yes, he is ultimately responsible. Bush sent them to war and he has a duty to take care of them - Bush failed.
|
|
by Matt
|
07/06/07 01:47 PM
|
|
I respect jg for being in the military. Maybe "this is how it has always been". But it shouldn't be this way. The vets always get the short end of the stick and that is wrong.
|
|
by jg
|
07/06/07 10:32 AM
|
|
What is the story here, been in the military, this is how it has always been and always will be. Servicemen/women like myself, have grown use to their unorthodox ways. Comes with the paycheck.
|
|
by Marcie
|
07/06/07 09:29 AM
|
|
The root of the current problems at Walter Reed is that they are overbooked, understaffed, and underfunded. We went into war unprepared to deal with the consequences and our wounded are paying dearly for it in that hell hole.
www.iraqinfections.org
|
|
by Kevin
|
07/06/07 08:30 AM
|
|
The Army's rapid response to the exposure of its neglect was not to correct the problems, but to conceal and deceive the public until a more thorough whitewash could be implemented - just like the corrupt administration that governs it.
|
|
by Sam
|
07/06/07 07:57 AM
|
|
With "serious problems in long-term care of wounded war veterans" "especially substandard living conditions" the gov fires the contractor that delivers mail. That should fix all the problems. Fire the gov employees. They're worthless. Been There!
|
|
by KG
|
07/06/07 07:20 AM
|
|
Walter Reed is just another shining example of what happens when gov't service gets privatized.
|