Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Canada boasts health care for all - in time
Delays make the universal system not quite as primo as 'Sicko' says.
By SUSAN TAYLOR MARTIN
Published July 8, 2007
Shortly before Christmas last year, Julie Mason of Ottawa, Ontario, received devastating news. She had ovarian cancer. Her husband's prostate cancer had returned. The costs of surgery, chemotherapy and radiation treatments could have been as overwhelming as the diagnoses. To date, though, the Masons' out-of-pocket expenses have been a veritable pittance: $266. "I don't like to sound like a flag waver, but if we'd been in the States, we wouldn't have survived," says Julie Mason, 62, a communications consultant. "I don't think anyone could stand the financial burden of two people with cancer." Now cancer-free, the Masons are among the many Canadians who rave about their national health care system -- a system also extolled in Michael Moore's new movie Sicko as one of the world's best. The controversial film slams the U.S. approach to health care, portraying it as a cold-hearted, profit-driven nightmare that dumps the uninsured out on the street and looks for any excuse to deny benefits even to those who can afford coverage. By contrast, Moore paints the rosiest of pictures in Canada, France, Britain and Cuba, where every citizen, regardless of income or "pre-existing" condition, is entitled to necessary health care at government expense. Among Sicko's most striking examples: When a Canadian worker accidentally severed all five fingers on one hand, the Canadian health care system picked up the entire tab of reattaching them. When an uninsured American sliced off two fingertips in an electric saw accident, he could afford to get only one reattached -- at a cost of $12,000. But is health care in other places really as terrific as Sicko suggests? A closer look at Canada -- a country similar in history and culture to the United States -- reveals a system that while truly egalitarian suffers from doctor shortages, long waiting times and hidden costs in the form of higher taxes and "health premiums." "It's a wonderful system, but unfortunately it's overloaded at the moment," says Gerry Brissenden, who at 75 divides his time between Ontario and St. Petersburg as president of the Canadian Snowbird Association. Crossing the border Under Canada's Health Act, Brissenden and his 33-million fellow citizens are entitled to all necessary physician and hospital services, including prescription drugs. They usually must pay for any drugs outside the hospital but costs are often much less than U.S. prices. Perhaps because they can see a doctor whenever they feel the need, Canadians on average live two years longer than Americans. And Canadians tend to be healthier: The country has a far lower incidence of obesity, a risk factor for diabetes, stroke, heart disease and some forms of cancer. Canada's health care system generally does not cover dental or eye care, however. And a shortage of diagnostic equipment - Canada has 4.5 MRIs per million people compared with 8.6 in the United States -- is one reason patients often wait months for tests and nonemergency surgery. As a result of such delays, a growing number of Canadians cross the border for tests or pay for testing at private clinics in their own country. Despite concern that "queue jumping" undermines the system's fairness, Canada's Supreme Court in 2005 struck down a Quebec law that banned people from using private insurance to pay for MRIs, cataract operations and other government-covered procedures. "Access to a waiting list is not the same thing as access to health care," the court said, noting that Canadians had suffered and even died because of long waits. Brissenden, for example, had his broken wrist in a cast for eight weeks before he could get an appointment with a doctor to replace two bones with a metal plate. If he could change one thing about Canada's system, it would be imposing a small charge for doctor visits. "Even if it was just $2, it would perhaps stop people from going to the doctor unnecessarily," Brissenden says. "Now they go when they get a sniffle instead of buying cough medicine, thereby causing longer wait periods." Another reason for lengthy waits is a shortage of doctors in rural areas and in certain specialities like obstetrics and gynecology. Concerned that Canada might produce too many doctors, the federal and provincial governments in the early '90s cut back on medical school admissions and made it harder for foreign doctors to be licensed. About the same time, thousands of Canadian-born doctors and nurses left the country, lured by attractive bonuses to HMOs and for-profit hospitals in the United States. "The big problem with our system -- and part of it relates to the planning of a decade ago -- is that our waiting times are considered unacceptable for routine and elective procedures," says Colin McMillan, a cardiologist and president of the Canadian Medical Association. "There are just not enough doctor and nurses to serve the population." Though the "brain drain" has largely stopped and medical school admissions are returning to pre-'90s levels, McMillan says patients in his province, Prince Edward Island, can still wait six months to see a consultant. "It should be four to six weeks, " he says. A plus side Some argue that delays are not always bad. After waiting about a year for a hip replacement, Sharon Sholzberg-Gray dreaded another long wait - this time for two knee replacements. But as the weeks ticked by, she lost so much weight that her knees stopped hurting. "Now I don't need my knees replaced and I've saved the health system two knee replacement operations," says Sholzberg-Gray, president of the Canadian Healthcare Association. The association represents hospitals, which are struggling with the fearsome cost of new technology and wonder drugs, particularly for cancer treatment. A recent series in the Ottawa Citizen on how hospitals use tax money found that drug costs rose 82 percent in just three years and the cost of new medical and surgical equipment zoomed 56 percent, far outpacing any other area of hospital spending. The pressure on hospitals will only increase as aging baby boomers demand more and better health services -- a strong argument for preventive care and healthy lifestyles, Sholzberg-Gray says. Costs escalate "No health system in the world is going to be able to be sustained unless people focus on keeping a healthy weight, eating healthy and reducing the amount of diabetes," she said. "But right now the problem, as with any health system, is we could use more money." Although the United States spends almost twice as much on health care per person, Canada's costs are rising so fast that the government of Ontario, the most populous province, began deducting a "health premium" from wage and pension checks in 2004 to pay for more doctors, nurses and hospital beds. The premium is based on income and can be as much as $900 Canadian about $852 U.S.. Canadians also pay far more sales tax than Americans -- 14 percent in Ontario compared with 6 or 7 percent in Florida -- and some of that money goes to health care. But to most Canadians, it's well worth it. When she was diagnosed with an "eccentric" form of ovarian cancer, Mason underwent treatment at Toronto's Princess Margaret Hospital, one of Canada's finest cancer centers. Her doctor was one of the country's leading specialists, assisted by a "wonderful" clinical nurse. Though Canada's taxes are higher than those in the United States, "I honestly believe that there's not a Canadian who wouldn't accept that trade-off," Mason says. "I see people a lot wealthier than me and a lot poorer than me and I know everyone is getting the same care. And for me, that's as important as getting my own care." Susan Taylor Martin can be contacted at susan@sptimes.com. Health care costs: Canada vs. U.S. The United States spends more on health care per person but Canadians see the doctor more often, live longer and aren't as overweight. | | Canada | U.S. | | Health care spending per capita in 2003 | $3, 003 | $5, 635 | | Life expectancy at birth | 82.1 (females), 77.2 (males) | 79.9 (females), 74.5 (males) | | Average annual number of doctor visits | 6.2 | 3.6 | | Obesity prevalence | 14.3 percent | 30.6 percent | Source: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
[Last modified July 7, 2007, 20:53:48]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Sandra
|
07/12/07 08:51 PM
|
|
As a nation we have the duty to provide health care to all. As a tax payer I am more than willing to have my taxes raised to assure universal health care. I grew up in a country with socialized medicine and,although not perfect,it is better than here
|
|
by Henry
|
07/12/07 12:13 PM
|
|
A well researched and balanced article. I agree with the comment about a minimum charge per visit to discourage frivolous "emergency" room drop-ins to treat sniffles.
|
|
by Lee
|
07/08/07 10:23 PM
|
|
It is funny how newspaper's prep us for potential things that their chosen Presidential candidates are stumping. I sure wish they would be objective and carry things from both sides.
|
|
by Lee
|
07/08/07 10:21 PM
|
|
What new treatments has Canada produced in the last 20 years?I think the Mason's should thank the U.S. for developing treatments that saved her life.One check for $266? Now average $20k annually for taxes(average income=$42k)& the cost is higher.
|
|
by greg
|
07/08/07 07:16 PM
|
|
we can never have the system that other countries have. first too many people live like leatches off of are system and the people in our government who vote for us to have it aready do have it and we pay for it.
|
|
by Stephanie
|
07/08/07 05:17 PM
|
|
If a government can fund a war, it can fund universal healthcare.
|
|
by Po
|
07/08/07 03:50 PM
|
|
...long wait with about 20 patients in the waiting room. Sounds like we also suffer from waits and shortage of doctors. I have no problem paying taxes for services. I have a LARGE problem paying for waste like we see now. We could take notes.
|
|
by Po
|
07/08/07 03:48 PM
|
|
All those negatives cited for Canada's system apply to the insurance system here as well, so why compare? I had to wait over a month to see a specialist w/insurance. I've had hidden fees and unexpected costs. Great care once in- after the hour....
|
|
by David
|
07/08/07 03:10 PM
|
|
If you are interested in wait times, check out http://www.healthservices.gov.bc.ca/waitlist/. In response to Floridiot, I would be fearful of your Government to.
|
|
by Richard
|
07/08/07 01:35 PM
|
|
2006 Canadian budget lists $22.1 Can. for 32.8 million pop. 2005 that is $6,740 per person more that double 2003 figures. Canada is extremely lucky to have a rich uncle spending $billions defending them.
|
|
by Sue
|
07/08/07 01:15 PM
|
|
Professionall I worked billing insurance for doctors. Our family tried to buy insurance thru our alumni organization- but NJ & NY are the only states that don;t allow it.
So we're on NJ Family care - and it's fiasco, after disaster after screw-up
|
|
by Dan
|
07/08/07 12:37 PM
|
|
How many people are destroyed because of Medical bills? I bet the cost of Universal Heath Care would be less than my Health Care Insurance and my doctor would make decisions. Lets take the non-value added middleman out of the equation.
|
|
by tom
|
07/08/07 12:36 PM
|
|
Dear Floridiot Valid point. But bear in mind the real reason for FEMA's dysfunction is all the money has been usurped by folks who desperately need bigger yachts.
|
|
by Pete
|
07/08/07 12:28 PM
|
|
I get tired of hearing people blame the government. The US government IS the people. We just have to make sure our elected officials represent US and NOT the corporations. Citizens Unite, Take Back America!
|
|
by Tom
|
07/08/07 12:17 PM
|
|
I'd sure like to go to a single-payer system and get rid of our private health insurance racketeers.
|
|
by Bill
|
07/08/07 12:06 PM
|
|
re Ciprodex same bottle same lot number from a US Plant
|
|
by Mark Hobratschk
|
07/08/07 12:00 PM
|
|
Oh please, this is another example of SPT's agenda. The Canadian system has its problems, but you can't objectively deny it gets far more for the $ than us. We ration healthcare just like Canada, except by ability to pay, instead of efficacy.
|
|
by Samual
|
07/08/07 11:50 AM
|
|
I don't see why I should be forced (taxed) into paying for all of these overweight pigs. I guarantee the system will be overran by all the fast food garbage eaters.
|
|
by Bill
|
07/08/07 11:47 AM
|
|
ciprodex Canada 34.50 cdn $
US 107.10 us$
Drugs us a ripoff
|
|
by harry
|
07/08/07 11:13 AM
|
|
What's the big concern about a large government-run health program? Isn't Medicare exactly that? Yet, how many American seniors want to shut down Medicare? The idea that the private sector is always better is simply ideology -- usually GOP.
|
|
by Scheherezade
|
07/08/07 10:28 AM
|
|
Now that the Times has its obligatory sop to medical industry advertisers out of the way, perhaps we could have a followup on the $$ per capita America spends on Halliburton, tax breaks to the rich and Bridges to Nowhere, in comparison to Canada.
|
|
by Dan
|
07/08/07 10:09 AM
|
|
The US spends about $2trillion per year, $6,000/person, on health care and, according to international rating systems, rank 37th in the world in terms of the quality of medical care. We spend more it total, and per capita, than any other country
|
|
by Dan
|
07/08/07 09:56 AM
|
|
Bottom line-health care spending per capita in Canada is about half of what it is in the U.S., yet the life expectancy in Canada is over 2 years more. In Canada it's better for the individual, in the U.S. it's better for doctors & insurance companies
|
|
by Paula
|
07/08/07 09:54 AM
|
|
Well, we can give the government a chance - or continue to let 47 million Americans who have NO health insurance suffer and DIE. Hmm...your chances are 1 in 6 of being uninsured. If you like those odds, keep the status quo.
|
|
by Elizabeth
|
07/08/07 09:34 AM
|
|
Floridiot, who is benefiting from the US system as it is now? Is it better to have to fill out paperwork and receive care, or never receive care at all?
|
|
by Rebecca
|
07/08/07 09:22 AM
|
|
Floridot's comment is ignorant. One of the main problems with the private US system is the enormous bureaucracy it creates because of the multiple systems of insurance. Canada has WAY lower bureaucratic costs per person!
|
|
by Ronnie
|
07/08/07 09:13 AM
|
|
There is no such thing as free health chare!
|
|
by tim
|
07/08/07 09:06 AM
|
|
We know many canadians that come to the US for health care,because of the long waits. My grandparents came here and became US citizens and all the relatives still come for major surgery. you think this is a panacea why are many Dr's going private
|
|
by Kevin
|
07/08/07 08:44 AM
|
|
You people amaze me. How are we supposed to pay for Universal Healthcare? Our taxes would be well over 50% (See Germany, England, France). Just put another mouth on the Government teet, that's the answer right?
|
|
by Paul
|
07/08/07 08:43 AM
|
|
Floridiot, repeated studies have shown that a greater percent of money is spent on administration and bureaucracy in the private insurance systems compared to the US government systems such as Medicaid. Maybe 300M means possible economies of scale.
|
|
by Don
|
07/08/07 08:22 AM
|
|
The USA may not have the government involved in health care, but you have the insurance companies instead. Which is better?
If you truely have an emergency situation, there is no wait time.
|
|
by chuck
|
07/08/07 08:21 AM
|
|
There is no way the Federal govt can run a system of the size of a national health plan. As a country, we cannot even properly fund the Medicare program & that only covers 1/3 of the population. Add to that the looming crisis with Social Security.
|
|
by Mike
|
07/08/07 08:17 AM
|
|
If I wasn`t to old to immigrate I would.
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
07/08/07 08:11 AM
|
|
We need this system. While Canada's system may be overburdened, that's only because they give everyone access to it. In our country we keep the load down by just denying access to a large part of the population.
|
|
by Bill
|
07/08/07 07:48 AM
|
|
Canadians pay higher taxes, that's true.
BUT in the States you have another name for 'TAXES', My Verizon bill is $15.75 a month, then they add...$10.38 in Taxes, Fees and Service charges. (66%)???
|
|