News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Column
We are a nation of things
By ROBYN BLUMNER
Published July 15, 2007
Who are we? asks filmmaker Michael Moore in the movie Sicko. It is a question I have been asking myself lately.
Moore asks the existential question relative to the kind of society Americans have. Why don't we have a national health care system on a par with other Western democracies? Why do we allow private health insurers to insert a profit motive into denying necessary care to sick people? What is it about American culture that has tolerated and even defended this abolition of responsibility to one another?
This brought me to a larger puzzle: What is American culture? When I randomly ask people I know this question, "hot dogs" comes up with rather distressing frequency.
I think it is undisputable that this nation's greatness emanated from its cultural roots in the Enlightenment. We as a people have few outward characteristics in common, but we share a set of understandings that have largely liberated human beings to live up to their potential. This includes a fealty to reason, the rule of law, individual rights, popular sovereignty, the common good and equal opportunity. With these cornerstones, American society was built. Even as we amalgamated our cultural soup with every new wave of immigrants, we held on to those core understandings.
But these ideas almost sound quaint today. The Bush administration has done more damage to our national identity than any one before it. You can't be a nation of equal justice when the president has eyes only for the fairness of process for loyalists like Scooter Libby. You can't have the rule of law when the vice president claims laws don't apply to him. You can't have a nation of reason when the government elevates faith and politics over fact and science. And you can't have equal opportunity or a common good when the rules are rigged to solidify ever larger gains for those at the top. President Bush has substituted our Enlightenment values for his own: Crass materialism (go shopping to show your love of country), class privilege, anti-intellectualism, cronyism, religious zealotry and American exceptionalism.
Without leadership to express a conceptual vision of the best of who we are, we have moved from a nation of ideas to one of things. Creature comforts and entertainment products define American culture as much as our Constitution once did. McDonald's and Xboxes are our ambassadors. We have been drifting in this direction long before Bush came to office, but his personal and political instincts accelerated it.
This change in our national character can be laid at the feet of government. When large numbers of people suddenly feel left behind by an increasingly stratified economy, they start struggling to appear not to be among the losers. Accumulating things is one way to convince ourselves that we are still ensconced in the middle class. A prize-winning book by Michael Adams on the growing differences in the values of Americans and Canadians says that Americans are becoming more self-involved, focusing on personal needs and one's own survival in society rather than broader social values.
That shift is inevitable when your government no longer appears to be on your side.
Moore clues us in to how Americans have been scared off of single-payer health care, one of the government benefits that gives Canadians and Europeans great peace of mind. The medical establishment called it "socialized medicine" raising the specter of Communism.
Even cowboy actor Ronald Reagan was enlisted to paint it as anti-American. Its cousin, a plan for universal coverage offered during the Clinton years, was killed dead by Republicans in the service of entrenched interests.
Then Moore points to other "socialized" services that Americans have come to expect as a benefit of citizenship. Things like police and fire protection, public schools and libraries, the postal service. When we are victims of crime we expect the government to help. Why not when we are victims of a heart attack?
Even in our romanticized past when our heroes were quintessential individualists, such as Daniel Boone, America's go-it-alone spirit and limitless opportunity was built on the free land granted homesteaders by the government.
The original G.I. Bill helped put millions of returning veterans through college, even granting them a monthly stipend above tuition costs.
When we think nostalgically of the mid-20th century we're remembering a time when government was a partner of the middle class, protecting workers, providing an economic launching pad for success and demanding through progressive taxation a shared prosperity.
Who are we now is not who we were. American culture is barely definable anymore. The go-go 1980s somehow convinced us that greed is good and that a caring society is weak.
Building on this, Bush's "ownership society" is really a "you're on your own society." It's disturbing, harmful and more than a little bit sicko.
[Last modified July 14, 2007, 19:48:25]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Dave
|
07/28/07 09:02 AM
|
|
I was in Ireland a few weeks ago. As we passed a MacDonald's, our tour guide jokingly referred to it as the "American Embassy." I felt my cheeks glowing slightly crimson as I thought about it. It was a powerful statement.
|
|
by Roberta
|
07/19/07 12:12 PM
|
|
Robyn, you are, once again, right on. You put into eloquent words what I can only think. I remember this country the way it used to be when I was growing up and I can speak from experience: it was better! I'm thinking of moving to Canada.
|
|
by chris
|
07/18/07 04:18 PM
|
|
I beleive we have lost our sense of community for all these reasons. Bravo to the writer.
|
|
by Gene
|
07/18/07 09:47 AM
|
|
Total Agreement, YET, another 'thing' - the knowledge one person, family, 'normal' (i.e. no association with a 'group') can in no way 'affect' the direction or 'effect' change. And so, I download more tunes, synch to my MP3, etc. and chill out at 69.
|
|
by ra
|
07/18/07 07:29 AM
|
|
This thing is all over the place! And Bush is the reason for all our problems? People vote for what's in Washington. So who is really to blame?
|
|
by George
|
07/17/07 08:22 AM
|
|
I think the main purpose of the government is to contribute the welfare of the general public. For exsample public money must be used for those who have lost their jobs in globalizing economy.Today american government is not familiar to people .
|
|
by Doc
|
07/16/07 07:14 PM
|
|
I see there are a few Limbaugh Dittohead parrots here, still spouting the official Right Wing line of nonsense.
Of course, Robin's hit the nail on the head, as usual.
Brilliant column.
|
|
by gil
|
07/16/07 01:19 PM
|
|
What a great article and so well said. This is one all Americans need to read and hope for change as this muist be reversed.
|
|
by tj
|
07/16/07 12:27 PM
|
|
Ayn Rand calls them 2nd handers, in "Fountainhead". Those who want the gov't to pay for all their essentials are the 2nd handers. Good thing Ford wasn't one or else we'd still be in horse and buggies, Gates wasn't one either or we'd hve no computers.
|
|
by Kay
|
07/16/07 11:54 AM
|
|
Yes, 9/11 changed us. I see that as a huge problem. We lost our country.
|
|
by Jenn
|
07/16/07 10:02 AM
|
|
Every generation gripes about how society is deteriorating before our eyes, and yet we persist. Blaming any one person or thing is simplistic. WE voted to give Bush a 2nd term, so that makes US complicit in the madness as well.
|
|
by Bob
|
07/16/07 09:06 AM
|
|
Please, there are many factual errors here! One of them being Blumner's failure to note HillaryCare would have created more bureaucracy and doubled health care expenditures to provide coverage to a very small, less than 20%, minority!
|
|
by Elizabeth
|
07/15/07 08:39 PM
|
|
Completely agree with Blumner, but also with Alan who posted below. There seems to be a huge difference in outlook between those over 45 and those under, who have never questioned materialistic values and the illusions capitalism encourages.
|
|
by Dave
|
07/15/07 07:29 PM
|
|
If you let 9/11 redefine who you are, you let the terrorists win. Why would you do that? I'd be very disappointed if American citizens would let 20 radicals with boxcutters change our nation, but then I guess I've been disappointed for years now.
|
|
by Monty
|
07/15/07 06:34 PM
|
|
In 1870 whale lamp oil cost $1.00 a gallon. Liberal solution: give the poor oil cupons. Then greedy, rotten J D Rockefeller went into the oil lamp business and sold lamp oil for .07 cents a gallon and did more for the whales than anyone since!
|
|
by Charlene
|
07/15/07 04:47 PM
|
|
I totally agree with your observations on the American culture of today.You have put into words what I have been feeling for some time. I believe history will portray Pres. Bush as one of the worst presidents ever.
|
|
by Jay
|
07/15/07 02:20 PM
|
|
Another supberb Blumner column. One of the very best. Point by point, it is accurate, correct, profound, and very sad. Thank you, Robyn, and don't be dismayed by a few comments from some responders who don't understand logic and reason.
|
|
by Sam
|
07/15/07 02:19 PM
|
|
What Kind Of Person Denies Health Insurance To Children? Saturday, President Bush said he would veto a bipartisan plan to expand the Childrenò019s Health Insurance Program. Indeed, Bush spends 3 Billion per week on Iraq, but he lets US children suffer.
|
|
by Mike
|
07/15/07 02:08 PM
|
|
There are 300,000,000 people in this country. You want the ones who brought you Iraq in charge of all that health care? These are the ones who gave us Walter Reed--for their own troops.
|
|
by Betty
|
07/15/07 01:47 PM
|
|
I disagree with your views. The evils of society are usually pinned on the current administration and the President is expected to "fix it." 9/11/01 redefined who we are. I'm glad we had a president with guts, and more attacks on our soil stopped.
|
|
by Karl
|
07/15/07 01:08 PM
|
|
During the two Clinton terms, my ins. premiums went from $125 -171/mo. Since Bush took office under cloud, my rates climbed from $171 - 691/mo (with $3000 deductible). Taxes to pay for national care could not be higher than what I pay now.
|
|
by Monty
|
07/15/07 12:59 PM
|
|
The late Molly Ivins was for the Canadian Health system for 20 years. When she had terminal breast cancer she did not go anywhere near Canada. She wanted the very best medical care, American care. And so will Ms. Blumner.
Blumner go to Cuba? Never
|
|
by Alan
|
07/15/07 12:04 PM
|
|
I agree with Ms Blumners analysis of America's dilemna. However, I see the real problem as the weakness of the US educational system. Mr Bush is the symptom, not the cause of our problems. The people just can't see the emperor has no clothes.
|
|
by Steve
|
07/15/07 11:23 AM
|
|
Blaming the president for eveything is childish and should not have been printed. Get a "grown up" reporter!
Blame Clinton, Walmart, Hollywood, Oprah, China and all the marketers for the recent upsurge in "greed and glam" culture.
|
|
by Selwyn
|
07/15/07 11:17 AM
|
|
Don't worry Robin, I'm sure the detractors will be out in force. Butthe same people who will send their sons and daughters to war can't seem to understand the same principle of shared common needs apply too. Unless we wake up, we're doomed.
|
|
by tom
|
07/15/07 09:22 AM
|
|
"Killed dead" Maybe next time have Roy Peter Clark edit your column...and thank you for pointing out that Bush is to blame for last night's late night snack at Steak and Shake...Wasn't it Clinton who jogged to the Big Mac outlets? Pass the Doritos..
|