St. Petersburg Times
Special report
  • The surrogate
    It begins with a woman who yearns for a baby and another who is willing and able to give her one. You can imagine the motives of the prospective parents. But what about the woman willing to carry a baby, give birth and then walk away?
  • More special reports
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Guest Column

Tax amendment would help all home owners and buyers

By CAROLYN KLING
Published July 17, 2007


City of Clearwater employee Peter Jakstas tows a "surf rake" behind a tractor as he cleans up the sand on Clearwater Beach recently. Clearwater is thinking of cutting back the number of days a week their work crews "rake" the beach.
photo
[Jim Damaske | Times]
ADVERTISEMENT

Excessive property taxes are threatening to destroy the American dream of home and business ownership for many Floridians. Without question, we are facing a crisis. If citizens are not being taxed out of their homes, they are being held captive.

Also, there is ample evidence to suggest that people are starting to leave our state in significant numbers, citing skyrocketing property tax rates as a chief reason. This trend must change. Fast.

Through action taken recently by the Florida Legislature, help is on the way. An important step was accomplished after the June special legislative session when Gov. Charlie Crist signed legislation to roll back and cap local property tax rates.

This action should be considered only the beginning of meaningful property tax reform in our state. The Legislature also voted to put a constitutional amendment for historic property tax relief and reform on the Jan. 29, 2008, statewide ballot.

While this proposal will provide significant property tax relief, passage is by no means guaranteed. This is a matter that deserves our full attention and our favorable consideration at the polls.

A vote in favor of the amendment will give property owners the choice of either maintaining their current "Save Our Homes" annual assessment cap, or changing to a new "super homestead exemption." The super exemption, combined with the recent statutory changes that "cut and cap" local property tax rates, will provide significant relief for the majority of homeowners.

First-time home buyers, buyers of lower-priced properties and those who bought their homestead within the past five years will benefit the most. During a time when housing affordability has become a major issue, this amendment will also help teachers, firefighters, police officers and other vital service providers realize the American dream of homeownership.

In fact, according to an analysis conducted by this newspaper, the new super homestead exemption would cut property taxes by about 70 percent for the owner of a new median-priced home in the Tampa Bay area. For example, the owner of a homestead property bought in St. Petersburg in May 2005, with a just market value of $207,800, would save an estimated $3,000 annually in property taxes -- if the amendment passes.

Voter approval will be advantageous for other groups as well. Current homeowners, especially those benefiting under the Save our Homes cap, will no longer be punished financially for changing homes, whether they upsize or downsize. Therefore, regardless of their current situation, a vote in favor of the amendment would benefit all homeowners substantially in the future, and, by offering a choice, hold harmless others who have no plans to ever move their homesteads.

As citizens, we have before us a historic opportunity to address the property tax crisis that is overwhelming our state. We are now at an important crossroads that concerns the very future of our state, and Gov. Crist's leadership and support will be instrumental. We hope the "People's Governor" will continue to work aggressively to ensure passage of this historic property tax relief and reform constitutional amendment that will greatly benefit so many of our citizens. If so, he can count on Pinellas County Realtors to be by his side for the duration.

Joined by Realtors around the state, we will continue to work tirelessly over the next seven months to make sure the amendment passes, and that citizens get the property tax relief they are demanding -- and so rightfully deserve.

Carolyn Kling is chairwoman of the Pinellas Realtor Organization.

[Last modified July 17, 2007, 07:28:45]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Joe 07/22/07 01:44 PM
Rick, you need to earn more about the amendment before commenting. With the 2 new measures in place, there is a spending cap. The amendment is a good start. After we get it passed, we need to do more to reduce property taxes.
by Rick 07/19/07 11:57 AM
This is a really bad tax. This tax HAS NO tax caps. When you move, you lose the 3 percent cap FOREVER. They will re appraise you home for full value--YEARLY. No Tax Caps, This was the--Reason we passed first 3 % tax limit. ,,,Vote NO
by William 07/18/07 10:36 AM
Polititians need to be removed from office period!!! Stop paying yourselves so much and live like the rest of us do...Crooks!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Max 07/17/07 08:37 PM
In Pinellas simple solution:stop fat spending. Consolidate Police, fire, sewer, parks...all of these services to the county level. Get rid of the 24 city managers, asst city mgrs... Fiefdoms. Let the exemption grow with the value or SOH 3%/yr.
by Doug 07/17/07 05:59 PM
They are keeping us busy with the tax cut joke while the Insurance costs are rising faster, ar least there is a cap "SOH" in place for home owners. Just remember Crist took $6 million from the insurance companies. Will anything be done about that???
by John 07/17/07 04:23 PM
The amendment does not cut taxes enough but is a good start. It's a good amendment but the real problem is local government's wasteful spending. They need to hold or cut wages bigtime.
by Floyd 07/17/07 03:23 PM
From Previous comment: And, there will be a cap on future property tax revenues based on the rate of personal income growth, and new construction to ensure that government cannot grow faster than personal income. There you go!!! Now vote YES!!!!!!!
by Floyd 07/17/07 03:22 PM
It also seems most of the comments on here are negative because most people don't understand the amendment. Most don't realize there is a cap. Here is an excerpt from the amendment: "See next comment"
by Floyd 07/17/07 03:18 PM
I have to agree with Carolyn, this proposal is huge for us in the state of Florida. Yes, I want to see this pass as a mortgage broker but it's because I see to many good people that earn the median income & can not afford a home due to taxes & Ins.
by michelle 07/17/07 01:44 PM
What you fail to address is that homes will be at the mercy of the comparable homes sold. The cap will be gone and your home will be assessed at TODAY'S MARKET VALUE..so if your home goes up in value so do your taxes. How can you see this as help?
by Travis 07/17/07 01:20 PM
Florida was booming 3 years ago until they taxed all nonhomesteaders out of their homes.My taxes more than tripled in 3 years.I know longer have the cash to spend there.That's why I'm selling and buying my vacation home in SC.Equal value Equal taxes
by GHB 07/17/07 01:15 PM
Save Our Homes helps? Some. Not all. It doesn't help people like me who look to buy. It doesn't help people who want to move to downsize or upgrade. It only helps if you buy and sit. We can't all do that. I'd save 2k with the super homestead.
by Curt 07/17/07 01:03 PM
This would be a welcome relief. I bought a home for $240,000 in 2001 and my property taxes cost me $500 a month. Insurance is another $300 per month. This is double from when I bought the home. I welcome the tax relief.
by fred 07/17/07 12:29 PM
has anyone done a calculation on the future tax on a home if the prices start to go up? Saving $3000 today vs giving up the "save our home" could be a real shock in say 10 years...
by John 07/17/07 11:23 AM
How does this proposed reform impact vacant land taxes.
by Lew 07/17/07 10:54 AM
The article is factually true but does not present entire picture. I am also a Realtor and would like to see more sales but Fl. needs to look long term and develop more varied tax revenue streams. Amendment is a short term fix to a long term problem.
by Lawrence 07/17/07 10:46 AM
Nonhomesteaders are the main people leaving Fla. My taxes went from $1700 to $8200 in 4yrs.I don't have the extra money now to spend in your restaurants,bars,stores,boating,etc.That's the bottom line.We'd rather spend our money in a fairer state.
by Patty 07/17/07 10:06 AM
Realtors better hope that all those FL residents with homestead will be out buying property that is vacated by snowbirds who won't be allowed that relief. I just don't get it.
by Larry 07/17/07 09:17 AM
Oh, by the way, has anyone's insurance premiums dropped? Didn't think so. When will the legislature tackle the real problem?
by Royboy 07/17/07 08:51 AM
Caroln, who do you suppose will pick up the tab for the $3,000 saved on the $200,000 home? I am a part time resident and I already pay $3,300 tax. Raise it more and I will find another sunny state for these 75 year old bones.
by Bland 07/17/07 08:37 AM
Interesting article in Sunday's Keys section of the Miami Herald, the average decrease in Florida Key property over one year is 25% or roughly $250,000 in sales value. Note that average sales value of property has been reduced to $750,000.
by Jack 07/17/07 07:48 AM
Spoken like a true real estate salesman. Save Our Homes was created to help real people not real estate sales people who get 7% for flipping properties. Vote NO on the 2008 Realtor Relief Amendment.
by AL 07/17/07 06:21 AM
Realtors like local government have been feeding on the rising property prices for years. Sale prices probably will not go down in the future. Real commissions remain at the same percent. So are they going to take a 7% rollback? Give me my $$ back!
by Moustache Peet 07/17/07 05:51 AM
Lovely article. Did it mention once you give up your SOH they can tax you out of your shoes. It does nothing for small business or the flock of snowbirds that will not be back.
by David 07/17/07 05:18 AM
We own two(2) homes. One is our primary, and the other is occupied by my wife's mother. How would this ammendment affect us?
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT