News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Proposed fine to bite hand of softies
Feeding strays could crumble your budget in New Port Richey if an ordinance passes.
By CARRIE RITCHIE
Published July 18, 2007
NEW PORT RICHEY - The days of tossing out bread crumbs for the ducks or setting out a saucer of milk for that stray cat might be coming to a close.
The City Council got its first glimpse Tuesday evening of a proposed animal control ordinance that would, among other things, make it illegal to feed stray or wild animals. That includes foxes, opossums and raccoons - as well as neighborhood ducks and stray dogs and cats.
The measure would also require residents to call authorities within 48 hours of taking in a stray.
The new rules would help control flocks of stray animals - especially cats - that have been gathering in certain areas where residents feed them, said Chief Code Enforcement Officer Michael Nastasuk. He said the Jasmine Heights area has been particularly problematic.
"You get hoards of cats and they're not cared for in a manner that a domesticated animal really should be," Nastasuk told the Pasco Times on Tuesday. "This is an attempt to try to mitigate circumstances such as those."
And the feeding and harboring provisions are just a couple of changes. The biggest change is a new section addressing the procedure for declaring a dog vicious after it has attacked someone. The owner would be required to confine the dog and meet other safety requirements.
The proposed feeding ban drew mixed reactions at the City Council meeting Tuesday night.
Deputy Mayor Ginny Miller described a woman in her neighborhood who feeds stray cats from her oversized purse. It's understandable that people want to help, Miller said, but officials worry about the stray population getting out of hand.
"The legislative dilemma is the poor animal outside who needs help versus the crazy lady attracting more strays," city attorney Tom Morrison said.
Suellen Szesyski, president of the Humane Society of Pasco County, argued that it would be inhumane to not feed a hungry animal.
"If I look out my door and see a hungry cat, I'm going to feed it," she told council members.
The ordinance will return to the council Aug. 7 for a second hearing and a vote. Council members want to strike the current rule allowing only three pets per household but requested no changes to the proposed feeding ban.
Such a ban would be for the better, said Martha Murray, director of Suncoast Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which handles the city's stray animals.
Murray told the Pasco Times that wild animals like raccoons and opossums can become aggressive when they expect food and can learn to depend on people, which hinders their self-defense.
She said reporting stray cats and dogs to the police is best so the SPCA can have them spayed or neutered. If the pets are lost, she said, the SPCA can help find the rightful owner or new homes for those pets.
And with shelter overcrowding, responsibility is a must.
"We're packed to the gills," she said. "It's just overwhelming. If you're going to feed them, you need to make a bigger commitment."
Enforcing a feeding ban would be a challenge, though. Nastasuk said they'll depend mostly on neighbors reporting neighbors because these violations would be hard to notice from a patrol car.
But authorities are serious about punishing violators, he said. A violation will cost residents up to $500.
If nothing else, making certain behaviors illegal will make people aware that they're wrong, Murray said.
"It's difficult," she said, "but it's a place to start."
Carrie Ritchie can be reached at critchie@sptimes.com.
[Last modified July 18, 2007, 08:48:55]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by howdy doody
|
07/19/07 10:32 AM
|
|
Evidently, spt cannot afford proofreaders...." Hoards" of cats? Maybe spt will try and hire professionals who refuse to proofread for nine dollars an hour.
|
|
by Susan
|
07/19/07 09:48 AM
|
|
How can the City Council even CONSIDER this? It is animal cruelty to let abandoned animals starve to death rather than let people feed them. Can Animal Control and SPCA GUARANTEE they will respond to ALL calls to rescue and shelter these pets??
|
|
by Dick
|
07/19/07 09:45 AM
|
|
Big Brother at his worst.
|
|
by Aaron
|
07/19/07 09:10 AM
|
|
some woman here in austin tried to make it illegal for pet cats to be outside. I dont think that these control freaks have any business in any ones personal affairs besides their own. More rules, more fines. Where does it end?
|
|
by tom
|
07/19/07 08:48 AM
|
|
I FEED A COLONY OF CATS EVERY DAY AND THERE NOT BOTHERING ANYONE GO FIND STREET CRIMES AND DEAL WITH THAT
|
|
by just ducky
|
07/18/07 09:53 PM
|
|
The main problem seems to be kitties - as to our feathered friends - would this ban also include backyard bird feeders ? . and what about hummingbird feeders... where to draw the line . . .? Which wild birds are acceptable . . . who decides . ..hmm?
|
|
by Tish
|
07/18/07 02:38 PM
|
|
I have captured and spayed or neutered over 20 cats and found homes for most of them, as the city has no provision for either. The SPCA is always full. Without alternative provisions, the city will be guilty of animal cruelty with this ban.
|
|
by Useless Laws
|
07/18/07 12:50 PM
|
|
I called animal control when i had a stray captured and they DID NOTHING becuz it wasnt agressive. Nevermind the fact that we had called previously about the same stray when it was agressive and they DID NOTHING. Animal control is mostly useless.
|
|
by Doug
|
07/18/07 09:04 AM
|
|
This is just one more example of situations in which the government should stay out!
People have the right to give aid to helpless animals that uncaring bring into this world in the first place!
Try spaying and neutering!!!!
|