News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
For 'wrongful birth,' $23.5M
A jury sides with a family over a USF geneticist's "rotten advice."
By COLLEEN JENKINS
Published July 24, 2007
|
Amara Estrada, right, hugs Kari Shipley, the wife of her attorney john Shipley, after the Estradas won their suit Monday against the University of South Florida and geneticist Boris Kousseff.
|
 |
|
[Ken Helle | Times]
|
TAMPA - From the moment their son was born, Amara and Daniel Estrada knew he would suffer. Baby Aiden had webbed toes, a cleft palate, low-set ears, a small head and genitals so tiny doctors had a tough time determining his gender.
The Estradas turned to the University of South Florida's chief geneticist for answers. Dr. Boris Kousseff couldn't pinpoint a specific diagnosis but told the couple their future pregnancies should produce healthy children.
On Nov. 18, 2004, Caleb Estrada came into the world with nearly the same birth defects as his brother. His devastated parents sued the doctor and university for his "wrongful birth."
On Monday, a jury awarded $23.5-million to the Estradas, who said they would have terminated the pregnancy or adopted if they had known of the risk for the genetic disorder's reoccurrence.
The Estradas are guaranteed only $200,000. Because USF is a government entity protected by sovereign immunity, the couple must ask the state Legislature to pass a claims bill granting them the remainder of the verdict.
"It's going to be a long road, but I'm glad this part is over," said a tearful Amara Estrada, 36.
Aiden and Caleb Estrada, now 5 and 2, are mentally retarded. They will never be able to care for themselves. They eat with a feeding tube and cannot speak. Aiden recently began walking short distances; experts are not sure if Caleb ever will.
They have Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome, a genetic disorder first diagnosed in 1964. The syndrome affects an estimated 1 in 20,000 to 60,000 newborns, who are unable to produce enough cholesterol for healthy development.
Within an hour of Caleb's birth, doctors at Shands Hospital in Gainesville diagnosed the syndrome in the baby and told the Estradas their older son likely suffered from the same thing.
But the diagnosis eluded Kousseff during the two years he treated Aiden.
The Estradas first visited Kousseff three days after Aiden's June 28, 2002, birth in Tampa. More visits followed in the coming months, none producing a firm diagnosis.
As head of the USF genetics department for 23 years, Kousseff had seen Smith-Lemli-Opitz in seven patients and written an abstract about the syndrome, attorneys said.
Still, he never hit upon the syndrome as the cause for Aiden's problems, a mistake an attorney for the university conceded during her closing argument on Monday.
Because of the oversight, Kousseff failed to warn the Estradas of the 25 percent risk that the syndrome would reoccur in another child.
"It was simple human error," said defense attorney Janice Merrill. "He wasn't cavalier in his treatment."
Based on what the Estradas' attorney called "rotten advice," the couple had a second child.
After two weeks of testimony ended Friday, Circuit Judge William Levens ruled that Kousseff's negligence resulted in Caleb's wrongful birth.
The university's attorney argued that Kousseff wasn't the only one to blame for the oversight. Dr. Lynda Pollack, a pediatrician and genetics specialist the Estradas visited once after moving to Orlando for Amara Estrada's new veterinarian job, also failed to diagnose Aiden.
Though she was not named in the lawsuit, jurors on Monday assigned Pollack 10 percent of the blame. They assigned the other 90 percent to Kousseff, who retired in October 2004.
Amara Estrada's job in Orlando proved to be too rigorous to manage Aiden's medical needs. She now has more flexible hours teaching at the University of Florida's veterinary school in Gainesville. Daniel Estrada, 38, works as an administrator at the medical school.
One of the couple's attorneys, Chris Searcy of West Palm Beach, estimated they have spent $53,000 so far caring for their son's needs. He asked jurors to award the Estradas about $47-million; the university suggested a verdict as low as $8-million.
Searcy said the case makes a strong argument for removing the damages cap for "unresponsive" government agencies. As things stand, his firm will seek a claims bill next session with full understanding that the process could take years.
The Estradas have not ruled out trying for a third child, he said. But finally aware of the risk for the genetic disorder and the pain it brings, the couple will end the pregnancy if the fetus tests positive.
Colleen Jenkins can be reached at cjenkins@sptimes.com or 813 226-3337.
[Last modified July 24, 2007, 00:11:27]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Tim
|
07/30/07 01:03 PM
|
|
This case is not about abortion. The media/defense lawyers are making it so. It is about the genetic "expert" who told them it was safe to have a 2nd kid--that the first kid's problem wasn't genetic.
|
|
by mike
|
07/28/07 05:02 PM
|
|
2 children that don't walk, don't eat, don't talk. They sought expert advice after the 1st child--and received a diagnosis of "non-genetic". Hold the high-paid doctors accountable. Don't blame this family-unless you have walked in their shoes.
|
|
by M.K.
|
07/28/07 04:51 PM
|
|
Shame on all of you who have posted such hateful comments without learning the details of this case. The geneticist missed the first child's diagnosis, stating that it WAS NOT GENETIC. If diagnosed as genetic, the Estradas would not have had a 2nd.
|
|
by Joan
|
07/26/07 12:28 AM
|
|
They've spent $53k on their son. No mention of which one. Hopefully they would have spent SOMETHING on him anyway. Ignoring that, Aiden would have to live 2216 years to warrant that award. Caleb only needs to live to 886. Trial lawyers and greed.
|
|
by dl
|
07/25/07 06:51 PM
|
|
Does anybody out there really understand what it takes emotionally and mney wise to raise even one child with only slight defects? My family knows. it's very emotinally and financially draining. I guess the money would be better spent on criminals!!
|
|
by Doug B
|
07/25/07 04:58 PM
|
|
Since the parents are obviously going to kill an innocent child if they are not perfect by "human" standards, I think they should be sterilized so this won't be a problem for them or any child they would willingly kill.
|
|
by Debbie
|
07/25/07 02:11 PM
|
|
They admit they will murder their preborn third child if he tests positive. They despair over their "imperfect" children. These people are detestable.
|
|
by Teri
|
07/25/07 01:19 PM
|
|
WOW why would this couple EVER even consider having another child after their first one had a genetic disorder, I don't care who said it was "likely" the next child would be fine! NOT so smart! Try adopting a child that is already here!
|
|
by Mike
|
07/25/07 01:06 PM
|
|
The doctor's only fault, if any, was he failed to inform the parents of the 25% risk that their subsequent child/children would face (to have the same disease like the first one).
|
|
by Roger
|
07/25/07 11:28 AM
|
|
They shouldn't have had more children if they didn't want to accept the risk of birth defects, for the public to pay for their impatience is disgusting. They should've waited for a good diagnosis before having more if they didn't want to accept risk
|
|
by tunaman
|
07/25/07 08:19 AM
|
|
Common sense tells you that if you have one child with a handicap there is a chance all your other children will too. They should have tied the tubes and cut the testies after the first one! Now they are thinking third time is a charm, whatever!
|
|
by ME
|
07/25/07 12:57 AM
|
|
This is a sad story however. If God had planned on me having children with defects I would love them the same. I do not see the point in getting reinburst for paying for your own children!... CRAZY!!
|
|
by Dr. D
|
07/25/07 12:14 AM
|
|
OK, look... you had a baby that was severely handicap. Wouldn't you get some sort of genetic testing of the unborn if you wanted to be sure? That is the parents fault. Pathetic verdict. Pitty.
|
|
by doctor
|
07/24/07 11:14 PM
|
|
Which is worse, misdiagnosing a child or being willing to kill him. Too bad that Caleb will not be able to sue his parents for wishing he was dead. "It is a poverty that a child must die so that we can live as we wish." God bless Aiden and Caleb
|
|
by jim
|
07/24/07 10:24 PM
|
|
just wondering if they ever heard of a 2nd opinion. especially when you are talking about what was at stake. the dr has a professional OPINION in field in which the phrase PRACTICING medicine is never fully appreciated until it's too late. very sad
|
|
by hope
|
07/24/07 09:42 PM
|
|
This was not a birth injury!!! Genetics is a game of chance. Heck if this is the case, where are my millions for giving a birth to a son with Down Syndrome. I've heard of wrongful death...but wrongful birth...this takes the cake!
|
|
by hope
|
07/24/07 09:39 PM
|
|
I find it quite strange that two people working in some type of health field did not ask for either a level II ultrasound and/or and amniocentisis. Why didn't the OB require testing(or maybe the parents refused) I think this lawsuit is bogus.
|
|
by Todd
|
07/24/07 09:22 PM
|
|
You have to be a complete moron not to realize the potential for the same situation again. The victim society mentality sucks...
|
|
by MDJD
|
07/24/07 09:12 PM
|
|
what a crock, jury gone wild
|
|
by Pam
|
07/24/07 09:02 PM
|
|
Perhaps these children are in their lives to teach them life is not about money and being perfect. There is something else here that they are definitely missing out on. Their selfishness to destroy a future child if not perfect is heartless. Shame!
|
|
by Tami
|
07/24/07 08:11 PM
|
|
If I knew I had a chance of my child having a brain defect, I would INSIST on the testing available plus some. They are the parents, they monitor the child. When it's a teen and does drugs, whose fault? Sue the county for not policing the corner?
|
|
by pk
|
07/24/07 08:05 PM
|
|
The fact that these parents would even consider trying for a third child only to abort it if it test positive for this in womb shows their obvious disregard for their children's lives. Someone better watch their other children for accidental death.
|
|
by Tom
|
07/24/07 08:03 PM
|
|
I think the case is a setup! It was an obvious deal to make abortion even more routine and pragmatic, rather than a moral issue. All the parties will get some money out of the "deal." No geneticist is that "stupid" for three years?
|
|
by pk
|
07/24/07 08:00 PM
|
|
I thought that malpractice was limited to doing harm through reckless disregard. If doctors are now liable for these huge jury awards due to misdiagnosis of a relatively rare and little known birth defect, their premiums will go sky high.
|
|
by Sue
|
07/24/07 07:59 PM
|
|
What a poor picture this tale portrays!? Shame on those parents, thinking they can pick and chose to have a "healthy" baby, and then blame the doctors. They definitely should rethink having another and make lemonade with their current situation.
|
|
by sc
|
07/24/07 07:48 PM
|
|
The cost for 24 hour nursing care alone will be nearly 150K a year. This does not include the adaptive equipment and special therapies they will require for the rest of their lives. This was avoidable and kudos to the parents for the courage to fight
|
|
by Sean
|
07/24/07 07:36 PM
|
|
This is sick, while I struggle to make bills, and we as americans struggle to keep jobs and pay for gas. this person get 23.5 million for not murdering their child because he had defects. Hello people wake up is this the new American Dream?
|
|
by Rene'
|
07/24/07 05:58 PM
|
|
How sad that they would have killed their baby had they known he had the same condition. We are such a selfish nation. God gives us children as a blessings and they have been blessed with two children. Two children who will always love them.
|
|
by AA
|
07/24/07 05:51 PM
|
|
He who is without sin among you, let him throw the first stone.
|
|
by Budddy
|
07/24/07 05:44 PM
|
|
How stupid can anyone be. The chances of another deformed child out weigh any opinion. They took the chance-- do not shoot the dealer, take some resonsibility people!!!
|
|
by Missy
|
07/24/07 05:00 PM
|
|
This happens. No one should be awarded money just because their kids are born with defects. And it is very insensitive to say that they would have aborted the second child if they had known that there were these defects! Be happy with the kids u have
|
|
by Irene
|
07/24/07 04:34 PM
|
|
What wonderful people: we'll try to have a pefect kid, but if anything goes wrong we can always kill it. Maybe they can find someone else to sue because, after all, mistakes happen.
|
|
by Rick
|
07/24/07 04:22 PM
|
|
The Estrada's are a dumb as the animals she treats; instead of devoting herself to the proper care of animals she should devote herself to the proper care of her OWN children - or is that too hard AMARA? Is God trying to get the Estrada's attention?
|
|
by Sam
|
07/24/07 04:21 PM
|
|
They got 23 million so my health insurance premiums go up while everyone else who has retarded kids get nothing! That sounds like true legal justice.
|
|
by Adam
|
07/24/07 04:17 PM
|
|
Reminds me of Gattaca. Did these parents tell the jury exactly what they wanted and how the doctor couldn't deliver their perfect child? What do you think God sees in us when we are born "normal" but have much worse problems in the inside?
|