St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Gonzales urged to clarify his account

The attorney general risks an investigation, a senator says.

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published July 30, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON - Attorney General Alberto Gonzales must quickly clarify apparent contradictions in his testimony about warrantless spying or risk a possible perjury investigation, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee said Sunday.

"If he doesn't correct it, then I think that there are so many errors in there that the pressure will lead very, very heavily to whether it's a special prosecutor, a special counsel, efforts within the Congress, " said Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.

Last week, four Democrats on Leahy's committee asked solicitor general Paul Clement for the special investigation of Gonzales. The request came after FBI director Robert Mueller appeared to contradict Gonzales' statements to Congress about internal administration dissent over President Bush's secretive wiretapping program.

Gonzales told the Senate committee that the program was not at issue when then-White House counsel Gonzales made a dramatic visit to Attorney General John Ashcroft's hospital room in 2004. Mueller, before the House Judiciary Committee, said it was.

On Sunday, Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter, the top Republican on Leahy's committee, said it would be premature to begin a perjury investigation until the panel could find out the facts.

The New York Times, citing anonymous government officials it declined to name, reported Sunday that the 2004 dispute was over computer searches through huge electronic databases, which contain records of phone calls and e-mails of millions of Americans.

If the dispute chiefly involved data mining rather than eavesdropping, that raised the question as to whether Gonzales might be technically correct, according to the article.

[Last modified July 30, 2007, 01:05:26]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT