News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Compromise is worth considering
By A TIMES EDITORIAL
Published August 1, 2007
Developers aren't known for giving substantial concessions to their opponents, so the revised plan for a combined Westin hotel and condominium at the corner of Fifth Avenue and First Street N in downtown St. Petersburg is a pleasant surprise. Fuel Group International, the developer, has scaled back the size of its hulking building by a third and has made a serious attempt to answer other concerns of surrounding property owners.
The original application for a 33-story building with a floor area ratio (or FAR, a measurement of a building's development density) of 14.5 was correctly rejected by the city's Environmental Development Commission. It was just too much for the edge of downtown. Now Fuel Group has returned to City Hall seeking approval for a 23-story building and a FAR of 9.6. In addition to reducing the size of the building, the developer agreed to improve the site's street-level amenities, traffic flow and parking.
The developer also has made an effort to listen to neighborhood associations that objected to the first plan. The two sides apparently failed to work out all of their differences, and there will be stiff opposition to the revised plan as well. But the reasons to oppose this project have shrunk along with the building.
Another upscale hotel would be an asset to a downtown that could use more rooms, and the building's decorative architecture and landscaping would replace a current eyesore. At 23 stories the building still would be the largest within a couple of blocks, but the reduced scale is a reasonable attempt to bring the project more in line with its surroundings.
The residential neighbors' chief concern is no longer the size of the building but the nature of its use. They are worried that the developer will operate a nightclub on the site, creating late-night noise, traffic and trouble. That's a legitimate issue. Both Fuel Group and city officials need to give the skeptics real assurances that it won't happen.
Development decisions in a growing urban area that mixes commercial and residential uses are always difficult. The Environmental Development Commission, which will decide the project's fate at a public hearing today, can find more reasons to be positive this time.
[Last modified July 31, 2007, 21:48:13]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Bob
|
08/01/07 10:27 PM
|
|
Then watch if it's approved that the city inspectors will look the other way instead of doing their job! The blinders go on to developers and flippers
|
|
by Carol
|
08/01/07 01:25 PM
|
|
Step into the real world, CJ. Development is a "for profit" business not a community service - of course they're looking for a big profit, that's how business works. It's up to the county/city commission to protect the neighborhoods long term plan.
|
|
by Paul
|
08/01/07 11:44 AM
|
|
what is the current eyesore that is there now that the article states? I drive by that intersection every single day and don't see any 'eyesores'... just a bunch of cool old buildings that are getting knocked down 1 by 1 so some fat guy can make $
|
|
by CJ
|
08/01/07 07:59 AM
|
|
Profitable Development 101: Propose a huge project, no matter how ridiculous, and if approved, laugh all the way to the bank. If rejected, offer "concessions" that are still insanely profitable. Example: 33 story building to 23 story building.
|