St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Airport tenants a source of debate

Albert Whitted supporters say preference should go to those already there.St. Petersburg

By CRISTINA SILVA, Times Staff Writer
Published August 15, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

A proposal to award national vendors retail space in a new terminal at Albert Whitted Municipal Airport has stirred up hard feelings over the future of the historic facility.

City officials are in the process of selecting tenants for the terminal, which is slated to open this year.

Among the favorite contenders so far are an aircraft taxi service that is not yet in operation and a nationally recognized rental car company.

But longtime supporters of the airport argue the city should have given preference to aviation companies already operating from the facility.

They have chalked up the bidding process as simply the latest snub from city officials, who have traditionally not supported the airport.

"They are trying to attract new businesses. They don't care about the people who are already here at all," said Thomas Hurley, owner of Bi-Plane Rides, a sightseeing venture that has operated from Albert Whitted for more than two decades.

"They just don't like us because we are the ones who fought to keep the airport open," he said.

Areas of discord

The terminal will consist of two counter spaces on the first floor and an aviation-theme restaurant on the second floor.

Construction crews are currently putting the finishing touches on the 10,000-square-foot building, which broke ground just over a year ago.

One of the counters on the first floor will most likely be awarded to Bay Air Flying Service, which has provided fuel and other services to pilots at the airport for decades.

The other counter, a 155-square-foot space, is the subject of the contentious debate.

City officials said they are considering splitting that small retail area among several of the applicants, including Avis Rent A Car, DayJet, the aircraft taxi service, and Bay Air Charter and Bi-Planes Rides, which both currently operate from the airport.

"The goal is to attract new users to the airport," said Richard Lesniak, airport manager. "We are hoping for more of a corporate or business user."

Lesniak said it would not have been fair to simply award the terminal space to businesses already operating within the airport.

"We have tried to be unbiased and make sure it's a competitive field for everybody and judge them based on their proposals and make sure everyone got a fair shake," he said.

But Hurley said dividing the small counter among vendors would make the space unusable.

The committee in charge of selecting the terminal vendors is composed of three city employees, including Lesniak. Ultimately, the mayor's office will be in charge of which companies will be awarded the space.

The committee has held several public meetings, but airport users said voters were not given a chance to offer their input otherwise.

Committee members declined to discuss the terminal space outside of meetings.

"They didn't ask the customers, the people who use the airport, what they wanted," said pilot Jack Tunstill, chairman of the Albert Whitted advisory committee. "There are a lot of people out here who have strong opinions on what the airport should be and they should have listened to them."

It's here to stay

In recent years, the city's management of Albert Whitted has been a touchy subject for the pilots and passengers who have frequented the airport for decades.

In 2003, city officials proposed closing one of the airport's runways and selling dozens of acres for new waterfront development, but voters overwhelmingly shot down that plan in a citywide referendum.

Lesniak, who was appointed as manager of the airport after the referendum, denied accusations that the city was trying to sabotage the terminal project by purposely ignoring local aircraft operators.

"I can't say I have ever seen or heard anything that anyone in the city wants to see or close down the airport," he said. "I think we are trying to look out for the best long term growth of the airport."

"The airport is not going anywhere. The voters made that very clear," he added.

Cristina Silva can be reached at 727 893-8846 or csilva@sptimes.com.

[Last modified August 14, 2007, 20:12:28]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Bob 08/23/07 10:44 PM
If this space belonged to a private business, it would have been finished sooner and there would be businesses up and running by now. The inefficiencies of government frustrate me almost as much as the taxes I pay to support these inefficiencies.
by JG 08/19/07 01:05 AM
Give me a break. This airport is funded by Federal & local tax dollars. The city should pick the best tenants avail. plain & simple. I like the idea of splitting w/Avis Rent A Car, DayJet, the aircraft taxi service & Bay Air Charter & Bi-Planes Rides
by maurice 08/18/07 10:45 PM
The St. Petersburg Times has lost a lot of circulation. 200 thousand is all the St. Pete. Times has. the illeagal raise by the city council and no referendum on the water front should just shut the St. petersburg Times down.
by TJ 08/18/07 11:22 AM
The city government is saving the retail space for"NEW OUT OF TOWN BUSINESS".The businesses at the airport have waited years for it, they worked hard for it, they deserve it. The airport belongs to the people of St Petersburg, not the city government
by Jack 08/18/07 06:40 AM
Some of the commenters don't understand (or don't want to) that funding for the airport comes from the users, not taxpayers. Revenue generated by the airport thru fees for hangars/fuel must be used for the airport. Airport is here to stay. -30-
by John 08/17/07 11:31 AM
Anyone can use the Albert Whitted airport. If you haven't stepped foot on it, why not? Take a bi-plane ride, or better yet, learn to fly yourself! That's what a general aviation airport is for.,.. the people.
by Danny 08/17/07 09:18 AM
Let's see.. If Biplane Rides has been in operation for over 20 years, and Bay Air Charter for nearly 10, it makes PERFECT sense that the retail space should go to a company that doesn't even exist yet. Wait, nope.. It makes NO sense.
by Bob 08/16/07 09:34 AM
This wide-open space should be covered with high-rise condos, bringing more water users and highway users to St. Pete. There are far too few people in the area. And maybe we can fill the condos with low-income, subsidized tenants and buy them cars.
by John 08/15/07 08:50 PM
The city is right to open up the process to anyone that wants to do business there. This is not the good old boys network. This airport is being funded by taxpayers, and the city should pick the best tenants avail.
by Harry 08/15/07 04:30 PM
Thanks to everyone who grows this airport, we have too few left. Let us all rise to the occation,lifting our flying spirit above the mundane, making a difference with continued thoughtful action or like Meigs we may not keep Whitted intact. File IFR.
by Doug 08/15/07 02:25 PM
The selection process was ridiculous. It resulted in stroger operators that would have brought more business to the city as a whole being exclududed. Rewarding existing tenants that have made no improvements to the field for years was "hometowning"
by John 08/15/07 12:39 PM
This airport recieves a monumental subsidy from the citizens of St. Petersburg - only a fraction of whom actually get to use the space. The airport is a waste of land, and a waste of money.
by LP 08/15/07 10:44 AM
If the city's goal is to attract corporate traffic to Albert Whitted, the most logical vendor would be an auto rental agency. However, directional signage within the terminal should exist to promote the biplane ride business that has tourist appeal.
by Eric 08/15/07 09:48 AM
"They just don't like us"??? The city subsidizes the airport with $500k per year for operating expenses (including 2008!!) and kicks in a even more matching $'s for project grants. Sounds to me like the city LOVES the airport.
by John G 08/15/07 09:45 AM
Why would the City EVEN think of a air taxi company that is not a viable entity and speaks of using aircraft that are not even FAA certified yet or proven safety issues! Go with a proven article, BayAire Charters and Tom Hurley's flight services.
by Bob Bixler 08/15/07 09:25 AM
I feel the facility should be shared by the businesses that have supported the aviation activities of the airport and who have struggled so long for the city and public support to keep the airport open and operational. That's what seems fair.
by Tim Goddard 08/15/07 08:47 AM
Those who have been operating out of SPG should have first pick on office space. They are mostly responsable for the successful operation of the airport, and have a vested interest.
by James 08/15/07 08:17 AM
This beautiful terminal building is an important "GATEWAY" for pilots and passengers and should attract Top Tier, proven buisnesses who will effectively contribute to our City's Hospitality.
by John 08/15/07 07:58 AM
The city made gereat progress with Mayor Baker, but I don't hestitate to point out that it was with substantial public input - wanted or not. This process is called "good government" because it is for and by the people. Continue it now.
by Eric 08/15/07 07:21 AM
What a complete waste of beautiful waterfront. How many other lifelong St. Pete natives can also say they have never stepped foot onto Albert Whitted. Our tax dollars should not be funding such a useless airport (and port next door,for that matter)
by jime 08/15/07 07:09 AM
Lesniak is a puppet of the mayor, who despite his words, maintains an end goal of destroying the people's airport. The Times needs to also report on the ridiculous insurance reqmts Lesniak and his string-puller want to hang on airport users !! BS.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT