St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Aid agency rejects $46-million from U.S.

CARE says politics behind food aid make it hurt more than help.

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published August 17, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

NAIROBI, Kenya - A humanitarian group has turned down $46-million worth of U.S. food aid, arguing that the way the American government distributes its help hurts poor farmers.

CARE said wheat donated by the U.S. government and sold by charities to finance antipoverty programs results in low-priced crops being dumped on local markets and small-scale growers cannot compete.

Other experts said they share CARE's concern but stressed that food donations are sometimes needed when a natural disaster harms a local area's agriculture, such as the flooding that North Korea says has devastated vast tracts of its farmland.

The Atlanta-based CARE agreed with that view. "We are not against emergency food aid for things like drought and famine," spokeswoman Alina Labrada said Thursday.

But, she added, the donation of wheat and other crops does not help in regions where people consistently go hungry because local farming has been weakened by international competition. "They are being hurt instead of helped by this mechanism," she said.

Labrada said such areas would be helped more if the United States and other donors gave cash that could be spent on locally produced crops, which would stimulate agricultural expansion.

Officials at USAID, the U.S. government agency for distributing aid, did not immediately comment Thursday.

CARE decided in 2005 to phase out accepting grain donations within four years, but the move is gaining new attention because of the current debate in the U.S. Congress over the Farm Bill, which is reauthorized every five years.

The U.S. farm sector and the maritime industry are the biggest supporters of the current system. The program soaks up surplus farm production, and shippers get lucrative contracts to transport donated grain for sale in needy regions.

The U.S. Government Accountability Office published a study in April saying that emergency American food aid takes an average of 4.5 months to arrive and that legal requirements mean two-thirds of the money spent by the government on food aid goes for packing and shipping.

Washington spends an average of $2-billion on food aid programs a year, mostly funneling the help through the United Nations' World Food Program. According to some aid groups, if the United States gave its aid in cash rather than food, it could support about twice as many people.

[Last modified August 16, 2007, 22:33:41]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Pete 08/17/07 09:04 AM
Well kiss my butt. You don't want our food, but only money to waste not on aid, but guns I say the hell with you! No more aid to anyone
by St. Pete 08/17/07 07:43 AM
Again, the U.S. government is willing to waste money so that those politicos in middle america can retain their seats by supporting U.S. farmers who are not efficient enough to succeed in the global market. Farm subsidies need to stop now.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT