St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Did fire at ground zero increase health risk?

Air samples from around the building say no, but environmental advocates have doubts.

Associated Press
Published August 26, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

NEW YORK - Panicked residents fear a partially dismantled building where a recent blaze killed two firefighters and stripped away protective coverings may be releasing some of the toxic contaminants that blanketed the neighborhood on Sept. 11, 2001.

Some experts, however, aren't so sure.

The Aug. 18 blaze at the derelict former Deutsche Bank building began on a floor layered with asbestos, lead, mercury and other toxins blown in when the World Trade Center collapsed just across the street, even tiny bits of human remains. Demolition crews have reduced the 40-story tower to 26, but about 15 of those floors had yet to be cleaned, and the fire exposed some of those floors to the elements.

But hundreds of air samples from a dozen monitors posted around the building before, during and after the fire haven't shown contamination that exceeds federal limits called "target levels." More than 300 tests for asbestos have been negative, according to private analysts hired by the Lower Manhattan Development Corp., the government rebuilding agency that owns the tower and is heading its cleanup and dismantling.

Paul Lioy, a Rutgers University professor who has studied air quality near ground zero since the terror attacks, said the dust in the building is not substantial enough to pose a serious health threat.

"To get that layer of dust outdoors would take an awful lot of wind," said Lioy, the deputy director of the Environmental Occupational Health Sciences Institute, affiliated with Rutgers.

Any dust that did escape through the now-open windows would be diluted, he said. "Then you're asking it to come through the windows and into their homes, and it's not a very large source."

Environmental advocates are skeptical.

"We think that there should be something showing up in these samples," said Kimberly Flynn, co-coordinator of 9/11 Environmental Action. "This was a big fire. Black smoke was billowing off of that building, as everybody could see and everybody could breathe."

[Last modified August 26, 2007, 01:33:22]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT