News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
South's governors echo Florida insurance woes
They say insurers are forcing states to step in with property coverage.
By JENNIFER LIBERTO, Times Staff Writer
Published August 27, 2007
BILOXI, Miss. - Governors of other coastal states are starting to sound a lot like Florida.
Near the second-year anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, Southern governors met on Sunday at a renovated casino hotel in a city nearly devastated two years earlier.
On the agenda: their states' continued struggles to find, keep and encourage insurers that will sell affordable homeowner policies.
A panel of insurance officials recommended that the states stop tinkering and allow the market to set their rates. But the governors of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama all said they're beginning to feel like they have no choice. They said they're increasingly sinking more taxpayer dollars deeper into the insurance business.
"I don't know a governor anywhere who wants to be in the insurance business, but I don't understand how we stay out of it," said Republican Gov. Bob Riley of Alabama, whose residents along 50 to 60 miles of coastline are hard-pressed to find any private insurance. "When you come in and say nothing is going to be available at any price, because it increases our exposure, then the states have no option."
Gov. Charlie Crist came to talk with the governors, just missing the panel due to a scheduling conflict, but he said he also heard similar complaints from other governors during a closed-door panel Sunday afternoon. "You get a sense of the frustration that my colleagues around the South are feeling, and they're looking for alternatives," Crist said.
Florida has become a polarizing force when it comes to property insurance policy. After years of holding the distinction of being the state to follow, Florida's recent policies have been criticized. They've been called "risky" and "knee-jerk" by Democratic Gov. Kathleen Blanco of Louisiana and Republican Gov. Mark Sanford of South Carolina.
They said they thought Florida took on too much risk when it expanded the state catastrophe fund, which provides cheap backup insurance for insurers. They also criticized Florida for allowing the state-run insurer to compete and grow.
Yet, at the Southern Governors' Association conference, those in attendance rattled off a long list of insurance problems, similar to those that have plagued Florida.
For example, Riley of Alabama and Republican Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi said that insurers refuse to write new policies in certain areas, forcing the state to pick up the riskiest property and not charge sound rates.
"No one is promoting a socialist system, but it's almost like the insurance companies want a semi-socialist system," Riley said.
While the governors are not willing to take the same road as Florida, they're acknowledging that government is increasingly being forced to fill in the gaps, because consumers need relief.
Blanco told insurers that while she understands allowing companies to charge what they want would bring more companies to her state, it also forces some residents to go uninsured. "From a company's perspective, reasonable rates are not necessarily equated to affordable rates," she said.
Coastal states continue to copy Florida on other types of insurance matters. Louisiana recently decided to follow Florida's lead in rejecting a controversial hurricane model that took into account issues like global warming in making predictions. Florida has a commission that studies and approves hurricane models, but Louisiana has no such group, so it took Florida's word for it.
Louisiana recently passed a law preventing insurers from dropping policies after a hurricane hits. South Carolina passed a law this year that says if insurers drop policies in the middle of hurricane season, they have to give more notice. Florida goes much further, saying insurers can't drop policies in the middle of a hurricane season.
"In the past everyone has looked to Florida, but that was before Florida went off on their own," said assistant professor Christine Berry of the University of Louisiana at Monroe. "Now we're still looking at Florida, but maybe with a little more caution."
Jennifer Liberto can be reached at jliberto@sptimes.com or 850 224-7263.
[Last modified August 26, 2007, 23:40:47]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Paul
|
08/30/07 12:15 PM
|
|
It's my right as a taxpayer to have a home on the coast, and no insurer should be able to say otherwise. We need to kick out the private insurers and create Universal Hoeowners protection.
|
|
by Joe
|
08/28/07 12:10 AM
|
|
The large insurance companies are just middle men. They are all insured by reinsurance companies. I say remove the middle men and their profits. Prices will stabilize. Tallahassee talks about tax reform skirts the real issue, insurance reform.
|
|
by Elaine
|
08/27/07 10:58 PM
|
|
If there are no storms this year causing loss dur hurr season there will be a 12 bill dollar surplus - so come on insurance companies - stop the greed!!
|
|
by alan
|
08/27/07 05:56 PM
|
|
i solved the problem; moved to al. went from $3000 a year to $600; same for taxes. fla sucks
|
|
by Mary
|
08/27/07 05:01 PM
|
|
didn't write homeowners...guess what!?? Most said "ok, we're outta here". Trust me, they don't "NEED" Florida!
|
|
by Mary
|
08/27/07 04:59 PM
|
|
Jeff, and other same-thinkers. Insurance is regulated to be sure they follow their bi-laws and rules. Government can't punish them for not wanting to write "policies for dummies"! Crist tried to reign them in - said they couldn't write anything if
|
|
by Rich
|
08/27/07 03:30 PM
|
|
On the homeowner's side, they don't see much profit in Florida. You may not have a claim, but a lot of other people do. Your premiums go to pay other claims for sinkholes, fires, water claims and claims involving attorneys with HUGE fees.
|
|
by Rich
|
08/27/07 03:29 PM
|
|
What most people don't understand is that companies like state farm are mutual companies. Owned by its policyholders. Profits are turned back to policyholders as dividends. Happens with their Auto Insurance frequently.
|
|
by JIM
|
08/27/07 03:20 PM
|
|
We are nuts in Florida to cover homes in excess of 417K dollars(FHA/Flood/limits). People who want more need to be in the surplus market. My insurer went broke, and I do not feel safe in Citizens but the other answer is no coverage. What an option.
|
|
by John
|
08/27/07 02:40 PM
|
|
A national cat. fund will likely never happen. Those 40 states with lower risks will likely never go for it. A better suggestion is linking auto, life, homeowners, health insurance together.
|
|
by missmea
|
08/27/07 12:56 PM
|
|
Why is it that they let Cubans in this country but not Hatians that is a big issue that needs to be addressed they come the same way so why can they not stay LAND OF THE FREE AND HOME OF THE BRAVE HA HA HA!
|
|
by Saf
|
08/27/07 12:51 PM
|
|
Big natural disasters create bid financial disasters. Jake38 is right, premiums don't equal profit. The insurance companies don't get to hoard all the money. There are employees, taxes, claims expense. Claims account for payment not claim expenses.
|
|
by missmea
|
08/27/07 12:24 PM
|
|
This more is a directed towards the black in the southren urban area.My point being that look at when katrena hit and look now where the rual famlies able to move home what happened to the black famlies in the situation?? put it together justanewform
|
|
by Kevin
|
08/27/07 11:55 AM
|
|
The Insurance oligopoly has managed to create a capitalistic system so abjectly corrupt and morally bankrupt that it makes socialistic and collectivistic alternatives attractive. Well done, sirs.
|
|
by jake38
|
08/27/07 11:04 AM
|
|
Florida insurance companies lost all after tax profits for over 40 years during 2004 and 2005. The idea of risk and exposure to it definately has a price tag.
|
|
by Jeff
|
08/27/07 10:41 AM
|
|
Why do we continue to allow insurance companies to write only the most profitable insurances in the areas with the least risk? Make them offer all types and coverages or nothing, someone will want the revenues.
|
|
by Sue
|
08/27/07 10:38 AM
|
|
Don't we already have a national catastrophe fund? I think it's called the IRS. Where do you think FEMA gets their funding?
|
|
by Tom
|
08/27/07 10:31 AM
|
|
A hurricane has not hit US land in almost 2 years. They raised the rates up when we got hit hard but they sure dont lower them when we dont. What a joke, im paying about 7 k a year for insurance.
|
|
by GH
|
08/27/07 10:01 AM
|
|
It's not just coastal homes that have the problem- I am not in a flood area at all, still no one. Who got hit the worst in 04? A lot were inland.
|
|
by Daniel
|
08/27/07 10:00 AM
|
|
My house is at 49 ft elevation, miles from the coast, my rates have jumped from 600$ to 3000$ with only Citizens willing to cover me. Something is wrong with the current system.
|
|
by Larry
|
08/27/07 08:58 AM
|
|
Why are we foolish enough to continue underwriting and subsidizing coastal building? We allow these people to rebuild in areas we know are prone to hurricane/storm damage, time again. If you can afford to live on the water...take your chances!
|
|
by Harold
|
08/27/07 08:35 AM
|
|
I have not once seen a complete thorough record of actual expenses and profits of each insurance company in Florida. I have seen partial limited figures. Where are the reporters, who have the courage to challenge this current corrupt system.
|
|
by Fi Fi
|
08/27/07 08:33 AM
|
|
All talk, no action. I thought governments had the right to "oversee" practices..How about an oversight panel to check into insurance company's dealings? No guts in govt. either.
|
|
by Ann
|
08/27/07 07:08 AM
|
|
Other high risk groups have formed "brotherhoods" to insure themselves, i.e. firefighters, policmen, Seriously, what if we did the same? Could we pull it off? Could we build a reserve large enough to cover the risk?
|
|
by Ann
|
08/27/07 07:06 AM
|
|
What if the gulf states formed a collective Citizens insur.grp, banning any other property insurance? Could we absorb the 15-21 bill. $ cost of Katrina and still remain solvent? Could the profit we make on inland homes and safe drivers cover the risk
|
|
by mike
|
08/27/07 06:32 AM
|
|
the only thing to do is evict all the poor people from the coastal areas, let only rich people live there and then eliminate all insurance policies. Everyone will have to insure themselves.
|
|
by Tom
|
08/27/07 05:45 AM
|
|
Insurance racketeers call the tune, always. They own enough politicians to block any reform, and they have enough lawyers to defeat policyholders and critics.
|
|
by Boo Boo
|
08/27/07 05:41 AM
|
|
Your laws have no teeth. Insurance companines need a swift kick in the butt. Everyday more and more evidence we need a national cat fund. A fund the politicians can't raid. Thats a pipe dream but it's better then those silly little laws..
|