News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
'Rock' puts Crist in hard place
The governor finds out what happens when his promises create high hopes in the constituency.
By STEVE BOUSQUET, Times Tallahassee Bureau Chief
Published August 29, 2007
|
Gov. Charlie Crist declared "taxes are going to fall like a rock" at the end of the 2007 legislative session in Tallahassee.
|
 |
|
[Times photo: Scott Keeler]
|
TALLAHASSEE -- For months, Gov. Charlie Crist has utilized his knack for compressing complex issues into crisp sound bites to create high hopes that insurance rate relief was on the way and property taxes would "drop like a rock."
It sounded good.
But homeowners are tearing open their preliminary tax notices to find token relief, if any.
The first-year governor is now acknowledging he may have promised too much.
"Perhaps. Maybe all of us in this room did a little bit," he told a roomful of reporters Tuesday, but said he would "keep chipping away" at the issue. Crist also made clear he wasn't blaming the media for raising false hopes.
"I didn't mean to blame you for voicing my 'drop like a rock,' so please forgive me if that was the impression I gave," Crist said.
Some of Crist's constituents aren't ready to forgive him.
Julie Latimer of St. Petersburg complained in a recent letter to the editor that her insurance rates are unchanged and her tax break will be $53.
"After all the special sessions and the press these two issues got, I guess I was expecting to feel more 'relieved,'" wrote Latimer, 47, a graphic artist and registered Democrat.
Political observers who have marveled at Crist's political skills see him uncharacteristically facing a problem largely of his own making.
"It was a political mistake for him to raise expectations so high," said Darryl Paulson, a political science professor at the University of South Florida. "No politician should want to raise expectations so high that they run the risk of not being able to deliver."
Paulson said Crist's best course is to lower expectations, admit a mistake and "beg forgiveness" from his constituents.
That should not be difficult, given Crist's 70 percent job approval rating in the most recent poll. But he now faces the risk of breaking his campaign pledge that he would not let people down.
Crist said Tuesday that many Floridians can still get property tax relief by voting for a larger homestead exemption in a statewide vote Jan. 29. He said he will be "very engaged" in mobilizing support for the proposed constitutional amendment, but passage of the so-called "super-exemption" is far from assured.
The ever-quotable Crist, who stays "on message" better than most politicians, drove home the same tax-cutting message over and over.
"The people need relief," he said on March 22. "They need property tax relief that is significant, that will make a difference in their lives, and we'll do it this year."
On April 9, Crist told reporters: "They want their property taxes to drop, and we will deliver."
Two weeks ago, Crist sounded defiant when he was asked if he promised too much in the way of tax and insurance relief.
"I never promised anything. I'm not going to overpromise. I'm very careful about how I speak," Crist told the St. Petersburg Times editorial board on Aug. 17. "What I've done is promise this administration's best efforts to do everything we can to reduce the burden of property insurance and property taxes."
Crist wasn't the only politician promising relief, but no one else comes close to his level of prominence.
Others amplified the help-is-on-the-way theme, notably House Speaker Marco Rubio, who could not get the Senate to back his plan to swap higher sales taxes for greatly reduced property taxes.
"There was a lot that was promised and sadly has not been delivered," said Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey.
Fasano said the governor alone is not to blame. He said legislators were too willing to "retreat" in the face of demands by cities and counties that they be allowed to override state-mandated rollbacks in property tax rates.
"I think we're all to blame. I am," Fasano said. "The people have a right to be unhappy."
On a third issue, casino gambling, Crist is being accused of breaking a campaign promise -- to oppose expanded gambling -- by now negotiating a compact that would allow slot machines run by the Seminole tribe.
Florida Family Action, led by John Stemberger, a social conservative who did not support Crist's candidacy, is organizing an e-mail campaign to press Crist to abandon a deal with the tribe.
The group is circulating a copy of Crist's 2006 interview with Florida Baptist Witness in which he said: "We shouldn't expand gambling."
"There are not many things I dislike as much as gambling, but there is one, and that's increased taxes. And I'm not willing to do that," Crist said on Tuesday.
The first sign that Crist has hurt his standing with his constituents may surface in September in the next poll by Quinnipiac University, which tracks public approval of Crist's performance.
Known for a fondness for sports analogies, Crist compared himself to Tim Tebow, the sophomore quarterback for the Florida Gators who also faces a burden of high expectations.
"He said, 'I promise one thing, to do my best, to do my best effort,' and that's what I have a duty to do," Crist said. "That's always my promise."
Steve Bousquet can be reached at bousquet@sptimes.com or (850) 224-7263.
WHAT HE SAID THEN: 'DROPPING LIKE A ROCK'
May 4, the last day of the Florida Legislature:
"A few more weeks for property taxes dropping like a rock. It will happen before (next year's tax) bills go out; that's all that matters."
March 21, at a speech to Broward County civic leaders:
"Don't believe what you're seeing in some of the papers -- not all of them -- that the rates aren't going to go down as much as we would like. They are -- I guarantee it -- they're going to keep going down."
WHAT HE SAYS NOW: 'GALACTICALLY STUPID'
Aug. 17, to the Times editorial board:
"I never promised anything. I'm not going to overpromise. I'm very careful about how I speak. What I've done is promise this administration's best efforts to do everything we can to reduce the burden of property insurance and property taxes. I can't say it will be a 30 percent reduction. I'd be a moron to say that. Why would I do that? That would be galactically stupid."
WHAT HE SAID THEN: AGAINST EXPANDED GAMBLING
Oct. 18, 2006, on campaign plane, flying from Orlando to Miami:
"You have a duty to negotiate with the Seminoles, in a compact. But I am not a proponent of expanding gambling."Asked about a St. Petersburg Times story that day speculating about future slot machines:
"I'm against it. The (budget) numbers work without it."
WHAT HE SAYS NOW: LET'S BE OPEN-MINDED
Aug. 21, 2007, speaking to reporters after a mansion event
"There are some other opportunities we're looking forward to help us with the budget challenges we have today. We're negotiating with the tribe ... I want to be open-minded and I want us to be innovative."
[Last modified August 29, 2007, 01:33:38]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Ned
|
08/31/07 04:16 AM
|
|
The State spent more money on the do nothing session that on tax savings. Charlie better deliver or he will be a "one hit" wonder. He can talk the talk but he has to walk the walk. CUT THE SPENDING, CUT THE TAXES.
|
|
by Kay
|
08/30/07 04:27 PM
|
|
Joshu, the Democrats are the ones supporting local government spending like drunks. It's time to vote out all Democrats. Everyone of them in the FL Senate voted against the prop. relief bill. These Democrats like Geller & Gelber are worthless.
|
|
by John B.
|
08/30/07 03:31 PM
|
|
RemeMber - super exemption tied to income growth UNLESS a majority of city council / county comm. as applicable vote to exceed the limit. Given their drunken spending so far - do you really think they'll honor the cap? We're safer locked in at 3%.
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
08/30/07 03:05 PM
|
|
The tax amendment WILL eliminate SOH long term, because if you move, you lose it. All this bill does is give a tax benefit to new home buyers that they didn't have before, while cutting services for everyone. It's a GOP scam, bostered by false spin.
|
|
by Ann
|
08/30/07 02:53 PM
|
|
I'm voting YES. Not a perfect solution but better than status quo of doing nothing.
|
|
by Jim
|
08/30/07 02:52 PM
|
|
Edna, you are mis-informed. The amendment has a cap at income growth which is near 3.9%. Plus it finally allows most people to move without getting killed in taxes. As for local gov't, they have been spending like drunken sailors, so it's time to cut
|
|
by CAROLE
|
08/30/07 10:15 AM
|
|
I HAD HIGH HOPES FOR MR CRIST. UNFORTUNATELY NOTHING WORTHWHILE HAS HAPPENED. TAXES ARE THE SAME,INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE LEAVING FLORIDA. WHERE IS ALL THE RELIEF THAT WAS PROMISED? I AM DISAPPOINTED IN MR CRIST.
|
|
by Jack
|
08/30/07 09:26 AM
|
|
Vote NO! If you get rid of the 3% cap and you move, you will NEVER have that option again. You will be stuck with a super exemption which in time will be erroded. Remember when the 25,000 exemption was put in the median house was worth 47,000. Think!
|
|
by Edna
|
08/30/07 08:21 AM
|
|
Let me say this again & clearly: vote NO on the tax issue. It is a long-term tax INCREASE disguished & sold to you as a decrease. The phase out of SOH will cause your taxes to skyrocket long-term, plus devastate cities & schools immediately.
|
|
by Kate
|
08/30/07 12:43 AM
|
|
A small increase in sales tax would solve so many problems. Vote YES!!! on the SOH amendment.
|
|
by Richard
|
08/29/07 11:26 PM
|
|
The Florida Legislature has been indifferent to our plight; citizens are responding at ̣01Cwww.FloridaBallotInitiative.coṃ01D print sign and mail the petitions!
|
|
by Debbie
|
08/29/07 10:48 PM
|
|
Keep teh gamblers going elsewhere. Ask someone who lives in Atlantic City or Mississippi. Vegas is different - it is isolated - TV is just helping to glamorise it.
|
|
by Doug
|
08/29/07 10:15 PM
|
|
Why should you vote no. Nobody is saying you have to drop SOH. Vote YES and it will help alot of new home owners out. Gov't spending is out of control so responsible spending must be forced on them one way or another.
|
|
by Matt
|
08/29/07 09:11 PM
|
|
Support the constitutional amendment. Property tax on homes is the worst tax ever. Why should we pay annual tax on our homes? Even when the home is paid in full, you still have to pay the tax. Its crazy
|
|
by J. C.
|
08/29/07 09:10 PM
|
|
Where is everyone getting their information from, lol? If this amendment pass, you can still choose to keep SOH. Although the amendment is not perfect, its better than nothing. I'm voting YES.
|
|
by Bill
|
08/29/07 08:16 PM
|
|
MAYBE HE CAN BORROW MONEY FROM HIS FRIEND PEARLMAN,AND GIVE US A TAX BRAKE
|
|
by Hey
|
08/29/07 07:37 PM
|
|
You can vote yes and still choose to keep you rSOH. Vote YES...then you at least have freedom to move if you wish to.
|
|
by Tom H.
|
08/29/07 05:51 PM
|
|
Tom, TIME SHARE?? I have no primary residence any longer. Increase my sales tax so I can no longer dress or buy toiletries.
|
|
by John
|
08/29/07 05:26 PM
|
|
John you will not lose your 3% cap if you stay in your home. And people please remember that the new tax bill is connected to income growth which right now is at 3.9% NOT BAD Vote yes
|
|
by Jeff
|
08/29/07 05:24 PM
|
|
and high property value or higher taxes and lower property value. Hope you make the right choice, and remember vote YES on Jan 29th.
|
|
by Jeff
|
08/29/07 05:24 PM
|
|
Joshua your services will not be affected. That is all nonsense that they want you to believe so you vote no. However your property value will go down if we can not bring more buyers back into the market with a tax cut. You choice lower taxes
|
|
by Jason A.
|
08/29/07 03:59 PM
|
|
One thing is that florida cannot stop The Seminoles from getting a class 2 license so Crist is trying to negotiate bigger payout to Florida. They know that if it gets denied, they sue in federal and get the license anyways with min. payout to Fl.
|
|
by Mike T.
|
08/29/07 03:51 PM
|
|
I've lived in my home for 3 years and support SOH. I bought a house for more than my neighbor paid for the same model 10 years ago - can I whine about that too, or is the crying reserved for taxes alone?
|
|
by John
|
08/29/07 03:48 PM
|
|
I don't need a choice - I've always bought a house I can afford, tax bill included. And I like being able to plan for my 3% increase years ahead to gurantee affordability. I lose that under the new plan - live within your means!
|
|
by DM
|
08/29/07 03:45 PM
|
|
There is no way I am voting for the super exemption. We need more permenant residents for our economy not flippers and 2nd home owners.The growth is causing tax increases so let growth pay for it. The solution is to cut Govt spending so fight that!
|
|
by Edna
|
08/29/07 03:27 PM
|
|
P.S. to my earlier comment (dang, they sure don't give you much room in these comment fields *lol*): Thanks to Crist et al., my property insurance was dropped as my insurer has decided to drop a ton of FL policies. NICE.
|
|
by Anonymous
|
08/29/07 02:42 PM
|
|
Vote NO on the constitutional amendment to "lower" your property taxes. It is short-term lowering & long-term RAISING due to phasing out Save Our Homes. Typical Republican Orwellian doublespeak. So vote NO on it.
|
|
by gary
|
08/29/07 02:35 PM
|
|
If you hurry Chrlie you can move up to national office before you have to actually 'fic' anything! Not that its just him, our problems is that they are all in it for themselves!!
|
|
by Joshu Jones
|
08/29/07 02:26 PM
|
|
Jeff why should I vote yes and see my local services curtailed and our already under-funded schools take a hit, just to prop up a bunch of speculators who are devastating our state?
|
|
by John
|
08/29/07 02:12 PM
|
|
Although the super exemption does not do enough for Floridians, IT'S A GOOD START. I will vote & support it. Let's get it passed and then work from there to get the Legislature to reduce taxes even more. The problem is the overspending of local govt.
|
|
by Vince
|
08/29/07 02:07 PM
|
|
Gov Charlie Crist will never be V.P. material in Washington. He's too much of a wimp in politics. He cannot even get the job done in Florida, and you think people will trust him with the nation, lol. His legacy will be determined by tax & insurance
|
|
by K.C.
|
08/29/07 02:00 PM
|
|
Are you kidding Paul? The Democrats were the ones supporting local government's overspending. They were the ones making the most noise hampering tax reief as demanded by the people of FL. It's time to vote out these Democrats like Geller & Gelber.
|
|
by Rich
|
08/29/07 01:57 PM
|
|
Mark, to get the legislature to co-operate, you cannot have it both ways. In politics, you cannot be spineless. Sometimes you have to choose sides. We were spoiled under Jeb Bush. He made enemies but got things done.
|
|
by Brian
|
08/29/07 01:53 PM
|
|
My insurance up about $500, taxes up about $150. I can't wait until the big savings comes along.
|
|
by John H
|
08/29/07 01:52 PM
|
|
Sen. Mike Fasano, R-New Port Richey, has it right. The problem is these local government wanted to continue their drunken spending ways and lobbied hard. The legislature was too willing to listen to these fatcats. It's time to drop the hammer on them
|