News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Column
Officials cut on one end, hurt on the other
By C.T. BOWEN, Editor of Editorials
Published September 2, 2007
Wednesday morning, former social worker Ann Hildebrand will gather with community movers and shakers for breakfast at a private lodge in Land O'Lakes to kick off a $1.6-million fundraising campaign for United Way charities.
After lunch, she'll return to her current job and sit atop an elevated dais with four other people and consider cutting public funding for those same social agencies.
These are the conflicts commissioners must confront as they continue to whittle $15.8-million from the proposed 2008 county budget to meet the state-mandated 3 percent reduction in the property tax rate.
In both tasks, Hildebrand will have the gavel. She is chairman of the county commission and agreed this year to serve as chairman of the United Way.
"Did you ever think we'd end up in this situation?" Hildebrand asks of the budget dispute.
While Sheriff Bob White's proposed spending has been the focus of most of the cutting - to be expected since his office accounts for 55 percent of the property tax in the county's general fund each year - there are other accounts to be scrutinized.
Hildebrand worries about the $381,000, equal to a $1 per resident in unincorporated Pasco, the commission provided to the United Way charity groups in the current budget.
Amid uncertain economic times and increasing foreclosures, the demand for social services will increase, she says. (It's a familiar lament. The sheriff made the same observation about deputies handling more domestic disturbances as household finances worsen.)
Commissioner Ted Schrader already suggested halving the formula to 50 cents per resident. Hildebrand is hopeful the amount could at least stay at $300,000, the appropriation approved in 2005. Commissioner Pat Mulieri thinks outside charity dollars can go if the county can't even afford the now delayed expansion of its mass transit service to Moon Lake.
Meanwhile, Schrader and Commissioner Michael Cox are trying to protect a new $2-million incentive fund for the Economic Development Council to recruit high-tech industry.
And Cox attempted unsuccessfully to persuade the commission to restore part of a $100,000 increase to the EDC's proposed budget for the coming year.
"We all have our sacred cows," says Hildebrand.
The mooing over the sheriff's budget won't end Wednesday, no matter the outcome.
Included in the county's capital construction budget for the coming year is $20-million for a three-story addition to the jail in Land O'Lakes. Capacity now, including a minimum security temporary facility, is 1,418. The project is scheduled to add 768 permanent beds.
But with it will come future budget machinations. If all goes according to plan, sometime in the next two years the jail addition will open to be accompanied by higher costs to feed, clothe and provide medical care for additional inmates. That's not counting the estimated 60 new employees - corrections officers and support personnel - to supervise them.
It's a point Hildebrand keeps making in the budget deliberations. The decision to build the jail all at once, instead of in phases, means the county must account for future operating costs, at an accelerated level, in the not-so-distant future. Meanwhile, voters will consider amending the Florida Constitution in January to take additional residential property off the tax rolls, which will mean even more difficult budget negotiations next summer.
Hildebrand repeats another question voiced publicly by County Administrator John Gallagher: For what level of service is the public willing to pay?
"The public is accustomed to having services and needs met. They call up and want a pothole filled or a ditch cleaned and we do it," Hildebrand says. "Now those dollars are disappearing, and the competition for them is extremely keen.
"These are all worthwhile programs, but at the end of the day the cuts have to be made."
[Last modified September 1, 2007, 20:51:17]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Dan
|
09/04/07 04:37 AM
|
|
Take the $162,000.00 that Mariano secured for sidewalks in Beacon Woods that most residents do not want and use it for better purposes, like the Sheriff's budget
|
|
by A. J.
|
09/03/07 07:39 AM
|
|
Anyone remember 'Penny for Pasco'?????
|
|
by Judy
|
09/02/07 08:06 PM
|
|
The Pasco Commissioners & Sheriff better heed the message from Pasco Taxpayers-those of you who don't support significant budget cuts will be voted out next election! Stop the charitable contributions and forget expanding the jail! We need tax relief
|
|
by mike
|
09/02/07 02:43 PM
|
|
Al...... there isnt any fat in the salary/benefit area...Pasco is far from excessive when it comes to those areas..
|
|
by jim
|
09/02/07 11:09 AM
|
|
I'm amused by the answer of cutting salaries and benefits while keeping manpower the same.Most county workers aren't making much to begin with except the upper echelon.You wanna work hard for less while cost of living here is skyrocketing?
|
|
by Fred
|
09/02/07 11:03 AM
|
|
Everyone has to suffer from budget cuts, the County just cannot print money. There will always be poor people. Jack Mariano could have saved millions for the county if he did not pander to constituents and the county is now mired in lawsuits.
|
|
by Trish
|
09/02/07 10:14 AM
|
|
Al, those services include providing support to Red Cross, Hospice...let me guess you have never used any of those services? How about shelter for women escaping their abusers? Those are services that we need.
|
|
by Al
|
09/02/07 08:23 AM
|
|
The county government exists to provide services to residents not to contribute to charity on our behalf! Cut some fat from the bloated budget & stop crying about reducing services..we can't afford your excesses anymore!!!!!
|
|
by John
|
09/02/07 02:16 AM
|
|
Give me a break, lol. Easy solution is to cut salaries & benefits while keeping manpower the same. Most of the property tax windfall went there anyways. Cut salaries & benefits along with fat & you have plenty of money. Budgets were 50% lower few yrs
|