St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Racial divide on risky loans

Minorities are twice as likely to get high-cost loans, a study shows.

By JAMES THORNER, Times Staff Writer
Published September 5, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

Black and Hispanic home buyers were twice as likely as whites to have bought their homes with high-cost loans in the Tampa Bay area last year.

And Acorn, a national coalition of neighborhood activist organizations, fears those racial disparities in lending could lead to mass foreclosures among minorities.

To compile the study, released today under the title "Foreclosure Exposure," Acorn culled mortgage data provided to the federal government by the region's top lenders.

High-cost loans, which in 2006 typically meant loans with interest rates higher than 8 percent, varied widely by race and ethnicity.

Close to 53 percent of black borrowers bought their homes with such loans. That compares with 48 percent of Hispanic borrowers and 23 percent of white borrowers. A similar pattern held for home-refinancing loans.

"We have seen a sharp increase in foreclosures in some of the urban and minority communities that most need to build wealth through homeownership," said Maude Hurd, national president of Acorn, which stands for Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.

"Too many of our neighbors were steered into unaffordable exploding ARMs adjustable-rate mortgages without being given an option for a fixed rate, and are now facing foreclosure, which harms their families and our communities."

The racial disparities stood even when incomes were roughly equalized, leading some at Acorn to raise the specter of discrimination. The group's regional version of a wider national study takes in Pinellas, Pasco, Hillsborough and Hernando counties.

"Some of our members would say it's racist. There's definitely a problem there," said Laura Goodhue, the group's Florida policy director.

High-cost loans, a term sometimes used interchangeably with subprime loans, grew in popularity as borrowers with lower credit scores pushed into the then-hot real estate market.

Goodhue alleged some lenders engaged in predatory practices by artificially inflating people's incomes to squeeze them into homes they probably couldn't afford.

"They told the homeowners they could always refinance," Goodhue said. "But you can't refinance now when your home's worth less than the loan amount."

Acorn is lobbying banks to be more flexible as such loans, many with adjustable rates, start to unravel.

"We need leniency from lenders," Goodhue said.

James Thorner can be reached at (813) 226-3313 or thorner@sptimes.com.

Loans by race

High-cost or subprime home loans in 2006 (typically with interest rates exceeding 8 percent) in the Tampa Bay area, by ethnic group:

Black: 52.8 percent

Hispanic: 48 percent

White: 23 percent

Overall: 29.3 percent

[Last modified September 4, 2007, 23:01:52]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by denise 11/23/07 08:05 PM
I have read the comments about the racist isssue.But in all reality,who feels it knows it. To say that it is not so,especially when it has happened to you.The study of racial desparity with mortagage loans at high interest rates are factual. ACORN.
by JR 09/07/07 09:32 AM
Chris, different cultures handle credit and money differently. Like in the hispanic market you'll find more people who are cash based and don't use a bank, compared to other groups.
by chris 09/05/07 05:36 PM
Ah, but the next question is if minorities have lower credit scores, why is that? none of you are addressing that.
by Ronnie 09/05/07 02:15 PM
What about a comparison of credit scores? Did some ethnic groups have lower scores, which caused the hirer rates? This is an incomplete article. But maybe that is by design.
by Jen 09/05/07 12:10 PM
Buying more than you can afford and thinking that your home will always appreciate to cover you is not caused by racism. Stupid isn't a race.
by JR 09/05/07 11:44 AM
From acorn.org and reading the full report, credit of the borrowers is not considered at all (as usual in these sorts of "studies"). The fact is, credit history controls your rate far more than anything else. Income only affects loan size, not rate.
by JR 09/05/07 11:33 AM
The study recently done across incomes didn't address borrower's credit at all. Any study that ignores the borrower's credit is worthless. If a minority group is more likely to have bad credit, they will have more subprime loans.
by Nick 09/05/07 09:32 AM
It's about credit-worthiness and one's own personal history, not race. Why must people always try to make something out of nothing. All those loans were assumed willingly, if they're not affordable to these folks, shame on them for making poor choice
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT