Print

Email story

Comment

Letter to the editor

Politics

Truth-O-Meters / Clinton's health plan

Statement: The first-year cost of $110-billion can be offset through savings.

- Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton

Ruling: The health care plan proposed by Clinton doesn't offer lots of details, but in one spot the figure is in black and white: first-year cost, $110-billion. The proposal goes on to show how that cost would be paid for with savings from other changes to the health care system and rolling back tax cuts.

There's no way to verify the $110-billion figure, but those offsetting savings? They're pretty optimistic, which is why we rate this claim as half true.

Much of the savings would come from "discontinuing" the 2001 tax cuts to households with incomes over $250,000 per year, which are scheduled to expire in 2010. Clinton, like most Democrats, has proposed letting those high-income tax cuts expire, which the Congressional Budget Office says would generate $52-billion in tax revenues.

Over half of the $110-billion would come from such things as saving $10-billion by phasing out excessive Medicare overpayment to HMOs and other managed care plans.

While it is true that the $10-billion in overpayment to Medicare HMOs exists in the system, so far the Senate has not agreed to such cuts. Whether Congress under a Clinton presidency would agree to slash reimbursements to a powerful private insurance lobby is yet to be seen.

The plan also estimates that $35-billion could be saved by "modernizing the health system" by encouraging health care providers to adopt cost-saving information technology programs and better management of chronic diseases such as diabetes.

Clinton's policy expert said the figure is a very conservative estimate, and multiple studies suggest the figure will be much higher. The Clinton campaign cited a 2005 Rand Corp. study that put the potential savings at $77-billion per year.

But that study is not without critics.

Dr. David Himmelstein and Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, practicing physicians as well as professors at Harvard Medical School, criticized that Rand study, noting that it was funded by a technology company.

At the time, the two physicians wrote in Health Affairs, "For decades, vendors have capitalized on this enthusiasm. But hospitals and clinics have ended up with little to show for their large outlays."

Himmelstein said Tuesday that promises of big savings through information technology is "pure vaporware."

"And though there's some evidence that disease management improves care, there's no evidence it saves money," he said. "People getting in to see their doctors means more cost, not less."

Statement: "What they will do is socialized medicine."

- Rudy Giuliani

RULING: In Tampa on Monday, Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani said of Clinton's plan: "What they will do is socialized medicine."

Mitt Romney made a similar statement, calling the plan "a European-style socialized medicine plan - that's where it leads - and that's the wrong direction for America."

Clinton's plan would call for individuals or their employers to bear all or part of the cost of health premiums. It would also rely on private insurance companies to offer plans, just as they do today through the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program. The government insurance that would be offered under Clinton's plan would be modeled on traditional Medicare, which has been supported by both political parties.

According to Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary, socialized medicine is "a system of medical care regulated and controlled by the government, in which the government assumes responsibility for providing for the health needs and hospital care of the entire population, at no direct cost or at a nominal fee to the individual, by means of subsidies obtained by taxation."

Uwe Reinhardt, a professor of economics at Princeton University, said the Clinton plan relies heavily on private insurance companies to provide coverage.

"If the insurance industry calculates this carefully, they'll make money off it," he said.

It's inaccurate to call Clinton's proposal "socialized medicine." It doesn't meet that definition because of the heavy involvement of the private insurance industry - which could turn a profit from the plan.

[Last modified September 19, 2007, 01:44:21]