News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Case against former deputy settled
The lawsuit claimed the deputy violated a Valrico woman's civil rights.
By COLLEEN JENKINS, Times Staff Writer
Published September 20, 2007
|
Daniel Brock, who was fired as a deputy at the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, is still fighting to get his job back.
|
 |
|
[DANIEL WALLACE | Times]
|
TAMPA - A Hillsborough County sheriff's deputy who lost his job over his handling of DUI cases has settled a federal lawsuit that accused him of violating a Valrico woman's civil rights while arresting her son.
Court records made public Wednesday did not reveal the terms of the settlement between Mary Beth Mazar and former Deputy Daniel Brock. Their attorneys said only that the details are confidential.
Mazar's lawsuit predated Brock's May 24 firing and was not directly related to the internal affairs investigation into his DUI arrests. But her accusations echoed those of the investigation, which found that Brock arrested 43 drivers who had demonstrated no visible signs of impairment. Of those drivers, 19 also had blood alcohol levels below the amount at which the law presumes a driver is impaired.
Mazar alleged that Brock arrested her Aug. 31, 2002, on a charge of DUI even though a blood alcohol test showed she wasn't intoxicated. She had been summoned to the scene to pick up the car of her minor son, who was under arrest.
According to her lawsuit, Brock threatened to arrest her after she expressed frustration over her son's arrest. The suit said Brock followed her home, forced his way into her house, shoved her into a corner and pepper sprayed her face twice. Later, the suit alleged, he held her down on the concrete driveway with a knee in her back.
Deputies also detained Mazar's 12-year-old daughter, who had demanded her mother's release, for 12 hours before charging her with obstruction, the suit said.
Mazar's DUI arrest later was expunged from her record.
In July, Mazar accepted a $100,000 settlement from the Hillsborough Sheriff's Office, to be shared with her daughter.
With Brock's settlement, the case is now closed. The ousted deputy is still fighting to get his job back.
[Last modified September 20, 2007, 00:40:48]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by fg
|
09/20/07 12:22 PM
|
|
I don't know why you're all so shocked, this is what they all do, always have and always will, because they think they are better than everyone else, and above the law!!! yes ... all of them!! This is what they are trained to become.
|
|
by Tom
|
09/20/07 11:40 AM
|
|
It is cops like this that make the public distrust officers. It undermines the good police work that the majority of officers conduct. That said, this is exactly why we must always questions officers and not accept what they say as always true. Sad
|
|
by Deborah Edney
|
09/20/07 08:38 AM
|
|
BROCK YOUR AUDACITY IS TYPICAL IN LAW ENFORCEMENT TODAY,YOU SHOULD BE IN JAIL. YOU BRING SHAME TO HONEST HARD WORKING POLICE OFFICERS. IT SPEAKS VOLUMES, THAT YOU FEEL IT IS STILL A POSSIBILITY, THAT YOU COULD GET YOUR JOB BACK???????????????????????
|
|
by Thomas
|
09/20/07 06:51 AM
|
|
This clown should never, ever, work in law enforcement again. I think the best utilization of his "talents" is as a sanitation worker.
|
|
by Aida
|
09/20/07 06:23 AM
|
|
Wow,,with crime the way it is here,,we DO NOT need anything like this animals wearing a gun and badge. Good riddance to BAD rubbish!!! As for Mazar, nice going, maybe you could take a few more of these jerks off the streets too.
|
|
by Jay
|
09/20/07 06:10 AM
|
|
EXDeupty Brock is a discrace to all, who wear the badge and pefrom their duties in a professional manner. Brock, should just leave Hillsbrough County and take his discredited ways with him.
|