St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Analysts watch, wince as Mexico's oil supply dwindles

They warn of an irreversible output decline.

By DAVID ADAMS, Times Latin America Correspondent
Published September 24, 2007


A ship passes near part of the Cantarell oil platform of Mexico's state oil company Pemex, near the city of Ciudad del Carmen, Campeche.
photo
[AP photo (2001)]
ADVERTISEMENT
Read more from David Adams


MIAMI - When left-wing guerrillas in Mexico bombed several pipelines in simultaneous attacks this month, it sent a shudder through that country's large oil and gas industry.

The threat of economic sabotage by a shady group known as the Revolutionary Popular Army EPR poses a major new headache for the Mexican government. But Mexico's energy industry problems run far deeper than terrorist attacks on its infrastructure, analysts say, and have major implications for U.S. oil supply.

"Mexico's oil production is in decline. There's probably no way to stop it," said Mike Rodgers, an expert at one of the top oil industry consulting firms, PFC Energy in Houston.

Mexico is the second largest supplier of oil to the United States (about 1.5-million barrels a day). But output from its major fields is dwindling fast, according to official figures from the state-owned oil giant Petroleos Mexicanos (Pemex). The country's known oil reserves will run out in nine years, the government says, potentially undermining the nation's oil-dependent budget.

Mexico's decline only adds more pressure to prices in a tight global oil market, which hit $83 a barrel Thursday. Worse still, its emptying wells are only a reflection of a global decline in aging oil fields around the world.

With no major oil fields left to discover, analysts say the world is approaching "peak oil," the moment at which oil production hits its maximum capacity and slowly starts to fall.

Mexican output peaked at just over 3.4-million barrels a day in 2004. "I don't believe we'll ever see it that high again, no matter how much is invested," said David Shields, an oil industry consultant in Mexico City.

Daily output at Mexico's biggest oil field, Cantarell, highlights the problem. Production there dropped by a staggering half a million barrels in the last 18 months, to 1.5-million barrels from 2-million. Once the world's second-biggest oil field, it is expected to continue losing production, down to as little as 600,000 barrels a day by 2013.

In Mexico, geology and politics go hand in hand.

The oil industry was nationalized in 1938. State control of oil and gas is protected under Mexico's constitution, which strictly limits foreign investment in the extraction of the nation's energy resources.

The Cantarell field, which lies offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, takes its name from a Mexican fisherman named Rudesindo Cantarell who discovered it accidentally in the 1960s after noticing his nets were coming up smeared in tar.

It turned out to be a dream find. Unlike most fields which are spread out over a large area, Cantarell is highly concentrated, spanning only 70 square miles of ocean floor. As a result, Cantarell's 200 wells do a job that would normally require thousands more drillings.

Geologists attribute this possibly to an asteroid that hit the Yucatan peninsula some 65-million years ago. Its impact may have caused subterranean cracks that allowed oil to run into a vast underground chasm. The same asteroid is believed to have led to the extinction of the dinosaurs.

But instead of reinvesting profits in new wells to sustain production once Cantarell runs out, Mexican governments used the oil revenue to pad their budgets. Taxes and dividends from Pemex's production last year amounted to $52-billion, 40 percent of government revenue.

Pemex's lack of access to foreign financing and technology has left it hamstrung as it looks around for new fields. Pemex has said it can offset declines at Cantarell with new production from other fields. While several sites, onshore and offshore, have potential, it would take a decade of massive investment to bring them on stream, analysts say.

"They really don't have a way to fix the problem," says Rodgers. "They could have if they had used some foresight. Now it's virtually impossible."

In his recent state of the union speech, Mexican President Felipe Calderon mentioned the nation's dwindling reserves.

"Our petroleum reserves have been reducing constantly. It has to be said," he said, as if broaching a taboo subject.

Rather than proposing ways to increase production, Calderon seemed to accept there was no way for Mexico to drill its way out of the problem. Instead, he called for "an urgent reduction in public spending to reduce the enormous dependence on oil revenue."

The fact that Mexico may be running out of oil should not alarm U.S. consumers in the short term, analysts say. The United States will most likely buy more from Canada, which is the nation's number one supplier.

New technology and high prices are helping tap vast new sources of so-called unconventional crude oil, such as Canada's tar sands. Global oil production (currently 85-million barrels a day) could reach as high as 100-million barrels per day in the next few years, analysts say.

But that may not be enough to keep pace with demand from growing economies such as China and India. In the long term, Mexico's problems are likely to be everyone's.

David Adams can be reached at dadams@sptimes.com.

[Last modified September 23, 2007, 22:28:28]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Katty 10/18/07 01:30 PM
i think we should not descriminate the illegal aliens because they come to our country to get a better life not to get mistreated. Im half hispanic and i have friends that are illegal but i dont have a problem with them not being perfect enough.
by jake 10/09/07 09:02 AM
Any renewable will have to work within the limitations of natural energy laws, Namely the inability to create it. That leaves concentrating energy and converting it into different forms the only way to go.
by John 09/29/07 03:37 AM
Talk about short-sighted. How about the money we hand out to destitute illegal aliens versus spending it on alternative energy sources. Fusion power does have great potential but it will have to be developed. We'll panic when the lights go out.
by serge 09/26/07 12:52 PM
Deliveries in the North America by the way of trailer trucks is a huge waste. Rail roads and water transport musty be used instead. By abandoning cars and trucks we can postpone peak oil for enough time to takje measures
by serge 09/26/07 12:50 PM
Well, why not to abandon idea of keeping our cars on the road? It would be wise decision. Public transportation sure can step up to the task if to put resources into it.
by David 09/26/07 10:06 AM
Price of fuel in US $3 a gal. Price of fuel in Uk/Europe c.$8 a gal. Any connection between this and the much high MPG cars in Europe? Wordl production will not hit 90mbpd let alone 100. Mexico is definately the wake-up call for the sleeping US.
by Ray 09/26/07 03:43 AM
That sucking sound you hear is the U.S. economy running out of fuel. There is growing evidence that Saudi Arabia may soon be joining the ranks of Mexico.
by brendon 09/26/07 01:05 AM
"sliding toward a post-industrial stone age" :(
by Bill 09/26/07 12:01 AM
With Saudi Arabia in decline along with Kuwait, Syria etc I find the idea of 100 mbd a little more than optimistic. The best Opec could come up with was a half million bpd increase for November and that may not be forthcoming either.
by levi 09/25/07 04:29 PM
"shady group" indeed, says a shady retard journalist...and probably a warmonger too.
by Jon 09/25/07 04:26 PM
The US uses about the same percent of the world's oil as we produce of the world's GDP. We work hard and are productive.
by Troy 09/25/07 03:41 PM
If you really look it Americans have caused this problem just look at what they drive compared to the rest of the world. In your eurpean countries they have cars that use 5 litres every 100kms, in the US Suv are using around 20 litres every 100kms.
by Jon 09/25/07 03:38 PM
The left has correctly predicted 100 of the last one crises in the world. No reason to think they will do any better now, as most of the arguments below are woefully inept. For instance, it costs more gas to make ethanol than it replaces when used.
by Jon 09/25/07 03:37 PM
Doom and Gloom from posters below. When and If Oil sustains a price of $80 a barrel for 5-10 years and doesn't look like it will go down, we will start replacing it with coal which is competitive with Oil when the latter reaches $60 a barrel.
by John 09/25/07 03:10 PM
Americans are like lemmings, to stupid to think about the future. They voted down the train between Tampa and Orlando and onto points further down the line. Floridains just put us years behind the curve.
by markm 09/25/07 11:17 AM
Oil companies are politicians. Don't believe anything they say.
by Kyo 09/25/07 10:26 AM
all of you fools who are preaching ethanol need to be slapped. Ethanol has an EROI of 5 to 1. that aside,you need petroleum based fertilizers and pesticides to grow the corn,gas to power the trucks transporting it,and tractors for harvesting need gas
by Jonathan 09/25/07 09:30 AM
end of the story is missing some import elements about the expense of extracting oil from tar sands in Canada. Its not that easy to just increase supply becasue they want it. Plus the fact that soon Mexico will soon have to import oil too. From who?
by Andrew 09/25/07 09:18 AM
I liked the joke at the end about world production possibly reaching 100 mbpd. It looks like production has already peaked at 85.54 mbpd in July 2006.
by Jaime 09/25/07 05:11 AM
Don't worry for global warming, as soon as the price of oil hits the US $ 120 mark the developing countries will reduce their use of oil and switch to Natural gas ethanol and Bicycles, after all they don't have extreme weather to worry about.
by BIll 09/25/07 04:49 AM
Like Brazil, we should focus on flex fuel cars and flex fuel filling stations.
by John 09/25/07 02:45 AM
It is about time main stream media began publishing what is a huge energy crisis on the horizon that we will be unable to dodge. The greater the awareness the more alternative preparations can be made and the fewer people will be severely damaged.
by Tom 09/24/07 10:14 PM
Almost every super giant oil field in the world has passed peak production and is on the verge of sharp declines. The smaller fields now being drilled can not possibly offset the depletion of these old fields and the net yield will be much less.
by bird 09/24/07 09:16 PM
Let's get going on an alternative energy source. Electric is not the answer as that has to use another fuel to generate it unless we can harness the oceans.
by Cheryl 09/24/07 07:47 PM
Americans are the most spoiled and selfish people on earth. There are plenty of alternative fuels and eco-friendly vehicles, and most homeowners can switch to geo-thermal, radient heat or solar for heat/AC. It does require a change of lifestyle.
by Dr_Dug 09/24/07 07:18 PM
No Big Deal..we'll just lend them some cash, build another source of power for them...then buy it back at ridiculous prices..Our next energy crisis of the future..contined stupidity..!!!
by Marty S. 09/24/07 06:10 PM
Mexico is taking OUR oil from the Gulf. And Canada is taking OUR oil from adjacent the ANWAR. Why do we continue to stick our heads in the sand? Drill in the Gulf! Drill in ANWAR! We also need to go nuclear.
by John 09/24/07 04:57 PM
How many millions of illegal immigrants will cross the border after their government lost the oil revenue?
by Steve 09/24/07 04:25 PM
We need to push for liquid coal in spite of what the protestors say. It can be done the clean way with carbon sequestration, and would be far better than ethanol. Kinder-Morgan in Texas captures over 1 billion cu ft of co2 daily!
by batsdude 09/24/07 03:10 PM
Great. Just great. Now i'll have to contend with thousands of new inexperienced bicyclists. us pros have enough problems!
by tim 09/24/07 01:44 PM
Is it appropriate to mention global warming at this juncture? Carl Sagan pointed out -the ocean heats up much slower than the atmosphere, but now it is warmer. As we strive to cool the air we will be stymied by the oceans.
by tom 09/24/07 01:18 PM
At a time when the nation carries colossal theft and unprecedented waste.
by Jeff 09/24/07 12:23 PM
One more reason to trade in the gas guzzler. I used to drive a big Dodge pickup, I now drive a Honda Civic. I miss the truck, but I am saving a mint. I can go anywhere in the state for under $30.00.
by Cynthia 09/24/07 12:22 PM
Americans don't know the meaning of the word "ration". Not since WWII have we sacrificed for the good of all. Our future generations will be suffering because of our selfishness.
by David 09/24/07 11:33 AM
The U.S. Consumers should be alarmed because the price of oil and gasoline are skyrocketing at a time in which the US Dollar is collapsing. Americans are going to lose their SUVs and consumer lifestyle.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT