St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Major cases being heard

Associated Press
Published September 30, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

The Supreme Court is set to begin a term Monday that could lead to enhanced rights for terrorism detainees, a ruling against part of a child pornography law and shorter prison terms for crack cocaine dealers. Among the major cases to be heard by the court:

Guantanamo detainees: Can detainees at the U.S. naval base in Cuba use U.S. civilian courts to challenge their indefinite imprisonment after Congress passed and President Bush signed a law that says they cannot? (Boumediene vs. Bush, Al-Odah vs. U.S.)

Crack-powder cocaine disparity: Does a federal judge have the discretion to impose a more lenient sentence on sellers of crack cocaine, most of whom are black, departing from federal sentencing guidelines? (Kimbrough vs. U.S.)

Lethal injections: Death row inmates claim that lethal injection as practiced in Kentucky violates the Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. (Baze vs. Rees)

Voter ID: Democrats and civil rights groups say laws requiring voters to produce photo identification in order to cast a ballot violate the Constitution. (Crawford vs. Marion County Election Board, Indiana Democratic Party vs. Rokita).

Child pornography: The government's appeal of a ruling declaring unconstitutional a portion of a child pornography law. (U.S. vs. Williams)

Investor lawsuits: Can third parties such as investment banks, accountants or lawyers be found liable for scheming with companies? Shareholder lawsuitsinclude one stemming from the Enron scandal. (Stoneridge Investment vs. Scientific-Atlanta)

[Last modified September 30, 2007, 01:51:06]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Tina 09/30/07 12:13 PM
Recall message regarding incorrectness of US vs Williams case.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT