St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • Friday Night Rewind
    It doesn't matter which team you cheer for. We've got video previews of every high school football program in Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco and Hernando County.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Clothes call dings Southwest, again

The airline will apologize after making a Largo man change his shirt.

By STEVE HUETTEL, Times Staff Writer
Published October 5, 2007


Southwest Airlines says it will apologize to Joe Winiecki for making him change his T-shirt, which uses sexual double entendre to promote a fictional fishing tackle shop.
photo
[Lara Cerri | Times]
ADVERTISEMENT
photo
[Lara Cerri | Times]
Joe Winiecki wears the shirt he wore on a Southwest Airlines flight when a supervisor told him to change his off-color T-shirt or get off the plane.

Southwest Airlines created a public uproar, then issued a public apology last month after crew members told a young San Diego woman that her miniskirt and tank top weren't appropriate attire. The message to employees from Southwest president Colleen Barrett: We're not the fashion police.

Oops, they did it again.

On Sunday, Joe Winiecki of Largo was sitting in the last row of a Southwest jet in Columbus, Ohio, ready to take off for Tampa when an airline supervisor instructed him to change his sexually suggestive T-shirt, turn it inside-out or get off the plane.

Winiecki argued that the airline was violating his right to free speech and objected to changing in front of other passengers. When the supervisor insisted, backed by a burly pilot and security officer, he changed into a different shirt rather than risk missing work the next day.

"It's really disappointing in this country when I can't travel from Ohio to Florida with the clothes on my back," Winiecki said Thursday. "Who's to say what's offensive and what's not?"

Southwest prohibits "lewd, obscene or patently offensive" clothing. But three hours after inquiries Thursday by the St. Petersburg Times, a spokesman said the airline made a mistake and would apologize to Winiecki.

"It was inappropriate for our employee to approach Joe," said spokesman Chris Mainz. "We don't have a dress code. Only in extreme situations would we want to address this to our customers."

He cited three examples: indecent exposure, extreme vulgarity and clothes with threatening language.

Winiecki's shirt, purchased on a cruise in St. Thomas Virgin Islands, uses sexual double entendre to promote a fictional fishing tackle shop. The largest lettering reads "Master Baiter." Winiecki said Southwest crew members on a flight from New Orleans last month told him "that's a great shirt and laughed about it."

A peristent irritant

Southwest isn't the only airline struggling to draw the line on what's acceptable behavior inside an aluminum tube packed with people at 30,000 feet.

Customers have complained, for example, about sitting beside travelers watching R-rated and pornographic movies on portable DVD players.

But what passengers wear, or don't, has been a persistent irritant since U.S. airlines were deregulated in 1979, opening airline travel to the masses.

"I've been in first class and seen people put their bare feet on the bulkhead," said Terry Trippler, an airline expert who owns an Internet travel club in Minneapolis.

Like Southwest, most airline have rules - called the "contract of carriage" - that ban travelers from going barefoot, smelling too bad and wearing offensive clothing. They leave enforcement up to employees in the airport or on the plane.

American Airlines employees removed a passenger off a plane a few years ago for refusing to take off a shirt depicting two nude people having sex.

Southwest kicked a woman off a flight in Los Angeles in 2005 over a political message on her shirt. It carried pictures of President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and a phrase similar to the title of the film Meet the Fockers.

Remember Kayla?

The issue moved into the national spotlight last month with the story of Kayla Ebbert, a Hooters waitress and college student. She showed up for a Southwest flight in July wearing a denim miniskirt and a summer sweater over a tank top.

An employee objected and asked her to change or leave the plane and get new clothes. Ebbert was allowed to fly after agreeing to alter her outfit. Her story ran in a San Diego newspaper column, then she and her mother appeared on NBC's Today show.

She sparked a debate that lit up Internet chat boards and blogs, with some defending Southwest for upholding decency onboard and others labeling the airline that once outfitted flight attendants in hot pants as aging and out-of-touch.

Winiecki, 39, a radiographer at Bayfront Medical Center, says Southwest employees didn't object to his T-shirt when he checked-in at the Columbus airport, cleared security and waited at the gate.

A bit of advice

Southwest needs to make the rules more clear to employees and customers, said Henry Harteveldt, travel analyst for Forrester, a technology and market research company.

"If they don't have a dress code, there's clearly an employee communications issue there," he said. "They shouldn't have people arbitrarily saying, 'You can't wear that."'

Times staff writer John Martin contributed to this report, which used information from the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. Steve Huettel can be reached at huettel@sptimes.com or (813) 226-3384.

[Last modified October 5, 2007, 01:40:34]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Mike 10/31/07 10:48 AM
Freedom of speech does not exist inside private property. If someone came into your home and didn't follow your rules, you'd be offended too. The shirt is supposed to be humorous, yes, but not to everyone, especially children present.
by Aaron 10/12/07 02:24 PM
This is now getting really stupid. People dont have the right NOT to be offended. Your rights stop where mine begin. I wear Big Johnson T-shirts all the time, and they are far worse than the shirt this man is wearing. If you dont like it, don't look.
by Charles 10/10/07 02:09 PM
For all the "Christians" saying how *boo-hoo* bad the shirt is: I'm much more offended by all the bloody crucified Jesus shirts telling me that he died for me. They're worse than horror movies!
by Mike 10/10/07 01:28 PM
The shirt isn't funny but it's not that offensive. It's also incredibly faded and hard to read. He's not hurting anyone else. Can't we just live and let live?
by Kat 10/09/07 02:10 PM
People need to relax and have a sense of humor. Everything is so censored in this country under the current administration and it is disgusting. It is just a shirt people, and it's not like it had real obscenities or porn. Chill out.
by Pam 10/09/07 09:32 AM
I'm proud of SW airlines for taking a stand. I bet Joe didn't respect his parents or teachers either. The only thing SW airlines needs to apologize for is "apologizing" in the first place. I'm tired of sexually suggested t-shirts, commercials, etc.
by jason 10/09/07 09:03 AM
Read his shirt and look at photo its about fishing how dumb is that people and you wonder why people loose there temper over nothing now and days be free and leave folks alone good gosh
by Roy 10/09/07 07:16 AM
The shirt was offensive and should be banned from public. The airline acted correctly. I am sorry they feel the need to offer an apology.
by Jim 10/08/07 04:03 PM
Many of you morons claiming foul over the right to "Freedom of Speech" obviously didn't pay very much attention during civics class. This man has no right to Free Speech on a SWA jet. His Freedom of Speech cannot be infringed by the US govt; Not SWA.
by Greg 10/07/07 08:06 PM
If it's offensive to others (and it is), he should change it and GROW UP, not try to make some stupid point over his rights. Freedom of speach shouldn't mean freedom to be rude to others and being a caveman!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT