News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Slim tax base intensifies budget woes
The Senate president is now forced to fix a problem that he tried to warn was coming.
By STEVE BOUSQUET, Tallahassee Bureau Chief
Published October 7, 2007
|
Senate President Ken Pruitt, left, talks with Sen. Daniel Webster during budget discussions Friday in the Florida Senate.
|
 |
|
[Scott Keeler | Times]
|
TALLAHASSEE - Five years ago, state Sen. Ken Pruitt sounded a dire and prophetic warning about Florida's future.
"The sales tax must be reformed if it is to meet our needs in the years to come," Pruitt warned fellow lawmakers as he called for sweeping changes to the tax system.
The plan Pruitt embraced in 2002 would have lowered the statewide sales tax rate from 6 percent to 4.5 percent and expanded the sales tax base to include billions of dollars worth of tax-free professional services.
It was an audacious move. After all, many of the services Pruitt and fellow Republicans said should be taxed were used by wealthier people - everything from accounting to safe deposit boxes, dry cleaning to charter fishing boats.
The idea, launched only months after the 9/11 attacks had bruised tourism in Florida, failed miserably under fierce opposition from Gov. Jeb Bush and a cohesive business lobby, who called it a back-door tax increase.
Now, five years later, Pruitt, a Port St. Lucie Republican, is president of the Senate and in the midst of a special session to trim more than $1-billion from this year's budget - and at least that much next year.
The main reason for the cuts is a dropoff in sales tax collections that pay for everything from library books to state troopers' salaries.
The Legislature's economists have attributed the budget shortfall to a prolonged housing slump, which they say has sapped consumer confidence, leading to fewer sales of taxable items such as cars and appliances.
"I believed it then," Pruitt said when asked about his passion for an expanded tax base in 2002. "At the same time, we're here to face the budget cuts. We're not about raising taxes."
One of the main arguments Pruitt and others used in 2002 was that Florida's reliance on the sales tax makes the state highly vulnerable to sudden economic shocks, such as the current slack housing market.
A broader tax base would insulate the state from the whiplash effect of a housing slump, they argued, because people always hire lawyers, accountants and architects.
Sen. Lisa Carlton, R-Osprey, who's now in charge of deciding what programs to cut, joined the chorus of senators demanding a broader tax base in 2002.
"We can't pay our own bills," Carlton said at the time.
The nearly 250 exemptions and exclusions from the 6 percent statewide sales tax would create an estimated $12-billion of revenue this year. The most sacred exemptions are groceries, prescription drugs, household rent and utilities, which no one has suggested taxing.
But Florida also exempts from taxation an array of items that hardly can be considered necessities. They include out-of-state sales of boats and planes $74-million; trips on charter fishing boats ($64-million); bottled water ($42-million); newspaper and magazine inserts ($41-million); livestock feed ($28-million); and college and high school stadium sky boxes ($1-million).
That's literally not the half of it.
Separate from the sales tax exemptions are an additional $23-billion worth of exemptions for professional services.
They range from haircuts to limousine rides, accounting to architectural design, engineering services to legal advice and pest control to TV ads. All are tax exempt.
Those are the items Pruitt and his colleagues sought to make taxable five years ago.
Term limits, which limit lawmakers to eight years in one office, also play a role in the Legislature's opposition to reviewing the tax code.
Nearly half of today's lawmakers weren't even in the Capitol on that day in January 2002 when Pruitt issued his call for a reform of the sales tax.
In 2007, it is Democrats who are calling for a broader sales tax base or for elimination of sales tax exemptions.
Most Democrats voted against the budget cuts on Friday, saying Republicans refused to even allow a discussion of ending business-friendly tax breaks.
"We've missed a good opportunity to examine closing some of these sales tax loopholes," said Sen. Ted Deutch, D-Delray Beach.
Republicans accused Democrats of playing politics, noting that for all their rhetoric, Democrats do not file bills calling for the elimination of tax breaks.
In fact, the only such bill filed in the Senate in 2007 was by a Republican, Sen. Bill Posey of Rockledge, to end tax breaks for ostrich feed and stadium skyboxes.
The bills went nowhere, and now lawmakers are bracing for even deeper budget cuts in the months to come.
"This is just the down payment of what we're going to be seeing," Pruitt said Thursday. "Families in Florida are feeling the downturn in Florida, just like state government is."
Steve Bousquet can be reached at bousquet@sptimes.com or (850) 224-7263.
[Last modified October 6, 2007, 20:04:29]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by sherry
|
10/09/07 08:22 PM
|
|
PIGS get fed, HOGS get slaughtered. State Reps - and their bloated budget - are headed for slaughter. To abolish property taxes and limit property insurance, visit www.FloridaBallotInitiative.com and
sign the petitions.
|
|
by James
|
10/08/07 06:58 AM
|
|
It would seem likely that if the tax base is suffering from the down turn in housing construction and real estate, maybe keeping those activities vibrant might be the answer. Do they carry any responsibility for this down turn? None they would admit!
|
|
by GH
|
10/08/07 02:28 AM
|
|
It is common sesne. I pay tax on my dog food, why not livestock? It's not a matter of just cutting back on what they spend, it's also ensuring we have continued revenue. I can cut back on things but I still need $ to come in.
|
|
by Carla
|
10/07/07 07:25 PM
|
|
Another of Jeb's blunders. Now do the right thing!
|
|
by j.j.
|
10/07/07 01:11 PM
|
|
cicero, no tax increases!! If we eliminate the tax exemption, we need to use all the tax savings to reduce property taxes. We do not need more spending. In fact, we need less.
|
|
by John
|
10/07/07 01:08 PM
|
|
Florida may be a low overall tax state but it has one of the highest property taxes in the country. It's time to cut local government's outrageous spending.
|
|
by John
|
10/07/07 01:05 PM
|
|
The only way I would support expanding tax base (tax increase) is to eliminate property taxes altogether. Otherwise, no tax increase. Governments need to cut spending, plain & simple.
|
|
by Cicero
|
10/07/07 12:45 PM
|
|
Florida is a low tax state. But we put too much of the tax burden on narrow sectors of our economy - like real estate. We should broaden the tax base for the sales tax and use the money to fund schools. This cuts real estate taxes by 40%.
|
|
by Tom
|
10/07/07 09:54 AM
|
|
Sales tax exemptions are a good start. But don't forget the many complete property tax exemptions and partial exemptions such as Green Belt giveaway that lobbyists and special interests keep alive.
|
|
by Ronnie
|
10/07/07 09:06 AM
|
|
Our government needs to have LESS during times when we cannot afford it! We are scaling back, so should they. Read my lips, NO NEW TAXES!!
|
|
by Steve
|
10/07/07 06:54 AM
|
|
Another knee jerk reaction fron legislators who can balance a checkbook at home, tell us how we should do it, but can't do it when it is their paid occupation.
|