News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Deal on health plan is possible
By MEL MARTINEZ, Special to the Times
Published October 8, 2007
I support making sure all of our nation's children have access to health care. The State Children's Health Insurance Program, more commonly known as SCHIP, is a program I want to see reauthorized; it's one I want to see expanded within the original spirit of the program.
But the bill President Bush vetoed last week and sent back to Capitol Hill recently seeks to expand the program beyond its original intent. It expands it to the point where we would be making government-sponsored health care available well beyond the original intent of the program to include families making more than three times the federal poverty level.
The current version of SCHIP would create an $80-billion to $100-billion program over five years to do something we could achieve with $35-billion to $40-billion - and the result would be the same: Ten million children from low income families will have health insurance.
Now that the president has vetoed SCHIP and support for a congressional override is unlikely, it is essential that we come together as Republicans and Democrats to talk about viable alternatives - something that would ensure the reauthorization of a SCHIP that expands, rather than diminishes, private health insurance coverage for children.
I have introduced an alternative reauthorization proposal composed of three elements - a full reauthorization of SCHIP, a child health care tax credit, and an aggressive outreach program to ensure all children eligible for the program have the opportunity to sign up for insurance.
The first element enacts a full reauthorization of SCHIP, where we would continue to cover children in families with incomes at or below 200 percent of the federal poverty level. (That is the current income limit in Florida.)
The second element of my proposal advances tax credits to families with incomes of between 200 percent and 300 percent of the poverty level. If a family doesn't have insurance, a credit provides the resources necessary to go out and purchase health care. Families would have the ability to purchase health care coverage tailored to their children's unique needs.
The third element would enhance outreach for children who are currently eligible for SCHIP coverage but who are not currently enrolled. It's estimated that between 500,000 and 1.5-million children are eligible for health insurance coverage but are not enrolled simply because they don't know the program exists.
Make no mistake: The underlying debate is not whether we're going to provide health insurance for our nation's children. We all agree that our society can afford to take care of the health needs of children in need. The dispute is over how that goal is achieved.
A real compromise needs to be reached, one that keeps with the spirit of SCHIP, one that adds provisions to help find children currently eligible for assistance and signs them up for insurance. We need a compromise that doesn't simply broaden the program's eligibility so that people on private health insurance are forced to move to government-sponsored health insurance because an employer sees an opportunity for cost savings.
The difference between the SCHIP proposal that was vetoed and my alternative is that their proposal moves the eligible population to a system of government health insurance and the problems incumbent with that system, such as low reimbursement rates for doctors and a smaller pool of health care providers to choose from. My proposal is patient-focused; it retains for families the choice of providers and practitioners and gives parents the resources necessary to add their children to their existing health care plan.
I look forward to continuing working with my colleagues in the coming days to strike a middle ground compromise on SCHIP. Rest assured - Congress will reach agreement, and when we do America's children will benefit.
Mel Martinez is a United States senator from Florida and primary sponsor of a bill to reauthorize the current SCHIP law.
[Last modified October 7, 2007, 20:43:19]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Andrew
|
10/09/07 07:27 PM
|
|
reading some comments: still bull about illigal immigrants (not covered by SCHIP), $83K (does not apply to FL, only 1 place in NY), state should cover through Medicaid (Medicaid is a FEDERAL program administered by state w/fed matching funds). LEARN!
|
|
by Dave
|
10/09/07 05:57 AM
|
|
A family member of mine has a pre-existing condition and I absolutely cannot get private insurance coverage for my family unless I lie. The sick are punished for being sick! Those who champion for privatized insurance clearly have a great life.
|
|
by Jeff
|
10/08/07 10:16 PM
|
|
With universal health care people are going to have to wait months to see doctors. The government has no idea how to run itself, so why would they know how to run health care? This is a very bad idea!
|
|
by Jeff
|
10/08/07 10:16 PM
|
|
Closer to universal insurance which would be a disaster.
|
|
by Jeff
|
10/08/07 10:15 PM
|
|
This is not a good idea. There is already a plan in place for poor children. We do not want to expand it to middle class people. If you make 60k a year you need to provide your own insurance. This program is just a way for Dems to get one step
|
|
by Lindsay
|
10/08/07 09:20 PM
|
|
I think Bush and Matinez want no child left behind except for health care and the Iraq war. all their comments are a smoke screen to prevent childrens healthcare costs and to keep our young people continuing as cannon fodder. They don't care.
|
|
by Mark
|
10/08/07 08:14 PM
|
|
it is not the federal government's job to provide healthcare. there are too many social programs in this country to begin with. where in the US Constitution does it say the federal government should provide healthcare? vote ron paul in 2008.
|
|
by Daves
|
10/08/07 08:07 PM
|
|
Both parties to me have let the American citizens down. I have no trust in Imperial Bush, but until they revise the Schip program I agree with the veto. America can no longer support the literary millions of illegal alien children
|
|
by MichaelK
|
10/08/07 04:05 PM
|
|
If your truly focused on the patients, then you wouldnt put The People in the hands of private insurers, who are only interested in profits. Everything else comes second to them, including You!
|
|
by Eileen
|
10/08/07 02:43 PM
|
|
Private insurance is a joke in Florida. Pre-existing conditions won't be covered! The sickest don't get coverage! SCHIP doesn't send you to government doctors, they're private providers.Karl Rove teaches conservatives to lie and hurt children.
|
|
by Dr
|
10/08/07 02:24 PM
|
|
The problem with health care in America was caused by the government. See http://www.inteliorg.com/ and we want to make it worse by giving it to the government?
|
|
by C
|
10/08/07 02:06 PM
|
|
..continued from last comment. Also, although I work full time with no aid, I have no Health Insurance myself to add my child to..and see no hope of any soon, but no child should go without.
|
|
by C
|
10/08/07 02:00 PM
|
|
The amount that is deemed 200 percent of the federal poverty level is not realistic at all. I am a single parent of one child and if I make $28,000.00 a year I do not qualify, or I have to pay $120.00 per month... I dare them to try & live on that.
|
|
by Daryl
|
10/08/07 01:45 PM
|
|
Three times federal poverty level is what - almost 80K a year? You make 80K a year and can't afford insurance? Sell the plasma screen, return the rims, buy a smaller house and take care of your kids!
|
|
by Holly
|
10/08/07 01:41 PM
|
|
I have yet to hear anyone say that if mom and dad DON'T have health insurance, and they get sick, who's going to take care of the kids that HAVE coverage? This does not make sense! Why aren't we trying to get EVERYONE covered, period!
|
|
by Tammy
|
10/08/07 01:11 PM
|
|
As a child advocate dedicated to helping make a change, you have my support.I think very strongly we need to Veto Bush.I guess Bush has never had a child with speicalneeds, and has always had health insurance for his children. What if the shoe was on
|
|
by DR
|
10/08/07 12:44 PM
|
|
If we were not spending so much money on the war, we could provide health care and our country would not be in such debt. Give the kids health care.
|
|
by Kim
|
10/08/07 11:45 AM
|
|
Where was Mr. Martinez when the origional bill was formulated? Why were the riders allowed? Party line be damed when it comes to helping children- our most precious resource!
|
|
by Joe
|
10/08/07 10:21 AM
|
|
Poor kids deserve healthcare but the federal government should not be in the business of providing it. that is the state's job through medicaid. i agree with the sen. help the kids spending the least amn't of $. too bad they didn't w medicare part d
|
|
by Lee
|
10/08/07 09:33 AM
|
|
Private insurers can exclude children with pre-existing (costly) conditions, precisely those who most need assistance most. Children's healthcare should not be about profits first (This proposal subsidizes the insurance industry); but children first!
|
|
by keith
|
10/08/07 09:32 AM
|
|
well, that's cool.
|
|
by Andrew
|
10/08/07 09:17 AM
|
|
Sen. Martinez' premise is that the same broken system that leaves almost 50 million Americans without health insurance, the one relying on private health care companies, is going to somehow be kinder to children's needs. It hasn't and it won't.
|
|
by geezer
|
10/08/07 07:58 AM
|
|
Quit spinning and override the veto! There's plenty of bi-partisan support to do so.
|
|
by jose
|
10/08/07 07:54 AM
|
|
I will vote out of office any senator or
representative that that does not vote
to override the President veto.
|
|
by Jose
|
10/08/07 07:51 AM
|
|
I will like Mr. Martinez to explain what good is a tax credit if you do not have the money to pay the monthly premium on a policy.
|
|
by Lauren
|
10/08/07 07:26 AM
|
|
As a child advocate and a social worker dedicated to helping make a change, you have my support!
|
|
by Jack
|
10/08/07 06:23 AM
|
|
Mr. Martinez - You and the others voting against childrens' health care should step out of your ivory tower; private medical coverage can cost $15,000 for a family.
|