News |
Bucs
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Columns
Hoping for Simms may be grasping at straws
By JOHN ROMANO, Times Columnist
Published October 11, 2007
TAMPA
It is the middle of the day in the middle of the week, and a solitary jersey dangles from a lone hanger. Here, in the far corner of the Buccaneers locker room, is where you find Chris Simms' career hanging in the balance.
Is he coming, or is he going? Are his best days still ahead, or already behind? And how much faith do the Bucs still have in him, and he in them?
The questions linger today, mostly without answers. All we know for sure is that Simms' career just grew shorter by another season.
By officially putting Simms, 27, on injured reserve Wednesday, the Bucs gave up the charade that he was recovered from the splenectomy that is now more than 54 weeks in the past.
It is an admission a long time in coming. The team refused to acknowledge it in training camp when general manager Bruce Allen claimed "health is not an issue." They refused to acknowledge it when final cuts were made and coach Jon Gruden agreed it was unprecedented to keep four quarterbacks on the roster.
The Bucs did not make this admission until Michael Pittman turned his ankle, and the team was faced with cluttering the roster with both a quarterback and a running back not healthy enough to play.
It'd be nice to know why the front office felt the need to deceive its fans for so long, but that's an issue for another day. It'd be interesting to know whether other NFL teams think the Bucs fudged by failing to list Simms on a single injury report before shifting him to IR, but that is also a question for down the road.
Today, the concern is for Simms' career and his place in Tampa Bay.
The optimist in us would like to believe Simms is simply continuing down a necessary road to recovery. Splenectomy does not fall under the norm of football injuries, and so the timing of Simms' return has been guesswork.
But, clearly, the Bucs expected him to be healthy by now. Otherwise, the team would not have agreed to hand over a reported $5-million in bonus and salary to Simms this season.
You should know, that's more money than a lot of NFL quarterbacks make. It's a better payday than most of Simms' teammates. It's a healthy chunk of the salary cap and, I would bet, a painful debit from the Glazers' bank account.
The point is not that the Bucs wasted the money, but that they obviously assumed Simms would be healthy enough to earn his keep. And that's what makes this week's decision so troubling.
If it has already taken Simms longer than expected to get back to normal, how far of a leap is it to wonder if he will ever be the same quarterback?
On the first day of the rest of his lost season, Simms was nowhere to be found during the open locker room period on Wednesday. That's not unusual for a player on IR. And it's certainly understandable for a player who was not happy about being put back on the shelf until 2008.
So we were left to wonder about the kind of things that occupy a young athlete's mind.
To wonder whether, in the quiet of a night, he is kept awake by the frustrations of his health. Or if he is troubled by anger over his fate. Worse yet, if he is plagued by doubts of the future.
It would only be natural if he were. An athlete's time is limited, and every day missed should be a day mourned.
Simms has felt a disconnect from his body for quite some time, and that has to be infuriating. His mind is ready, his heart is willing, but his body is still not responding.
Maybe the intrusive nature of the surgery - the amount of nerves and muscle involved - simply requires more healing than Simms and the Bucs anticipated. That's your best-case scenario.
But it still opens a whole new set of questions for next year and beyond.
Can the Bucs afford to count on Simms as a potential starter or the No. 2 quarterback in 2008, because they will certainly be paying him as if he were. Or should they return to the open market to find a veteran to back up Jeff Garcia?
And is there any chance the Bucs could trade Simms, or would it be impossible given his recent medical history? I would think no team would be willing to take that risk without at least seeing Simms perform in the preseason.
The best guess is that Simms is back in training camp with the Bucs next season. They've paid him far too much money to prematurely cut him loose, and his health is too uncertain to get any value in return.
And so the only alternative now is to hope and wait.
Hope for the best, and wait for the day when that jersey comes off the hanger.
John Romano can be reached at romano@sptimes.com.
[Last modified October 10, 2007, 22:03:45]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by MARIE
|
10/11/07 07:09 PM
|
|
WE LOVE YOU CHRIS!
GET STRONG, GET WELL....SHOW THEM ALL!
|
|
by george
|
10/11/07 07:03 PM
|
|
great article! the truth finally comes out. you should've also mentioned about getting rid of brooks ( the opposite of a leader) three years ago. next time mention that gruden and allen have no loyalty to proven players (rice,sapps & lynch).
|
|
by kim
|
10/11/07 04:20 PM
|
|
How can you say its been long enough to heal. There has never been a injury like this. No one knows how long it would take sounds like you been hanging around DR Rick Stroud too long. Just give the facts not your opinion.You sound like Uncle Rico
|
|
by Phil Simms
|
10/11/07 03:32 PM
|
|
Chris Simms is a great guy and an average quarterback with a very deliberate throwing motion. His last 4 games were appalling - if you true fans remember - and he's not throwing near that "well" now. The guy needs lots of work and rehab.
|
|
by Uncle Rico
|
10/11/07 02:56 PM
|
|
Simms a "top 5 qb"?!?!
Ahahahahaha Thanks for the laugh, Nick. Did you catch the 1st 3 games last year by any chance?
|
|
by Ed
|
10/11/07 02:07 PM
|
|
Besides Garcia there are no legit QB options on this squad. Draft one this year please!
|
|
by Jeff
|
10/11/07 12:25 PM
|
|
Simms is a class act and I had hoped he would have been healthy but he's not. Gruden/Allen should have released him before the season began. If Garcia goes down we are in the same situation we were last year, 2 guys that don't have good experience.
|
|
by Mike
|
10/11/07 11:24 AM
|
|
It's possible they kept him on the roster so that a) they could try and trade him in the event a team needs him and b) they didn't want him to go to another team in the division for nothing (Atlanta).... or were you just trying to bash the FO AGAIN?
|
|
by Sue
|
10/11/07 10:50 AM
|
|
Even Garcia shouldnt be able to save Grudens job. Putting Simms on IR was just another lie by Allen and Gruden. go ahead trade him to Carolina and watch Grudens face when he lights him up.
|
|
by Paul
|
10/11/07 10:47 AM
|
|
Face it folks, Chris Simms was never cut out to be anything more than a backup. He hit the backs of the O-Line's helmets as often as he hit receivers. I feel bad for the guy, but he was never a franchise QB.
|
|
by Robbie
|
10/11/07 10:38 AM
|
|
This has got to hurt Chris. He's one of the good guy's in the NFL, both on the field and off. It's clear the Glazer's have faith in him, but the mind games that Gruden plays with him are almost as bad as the physical injury he has suffered.
|
|
by Nick
|
10/11/07 10:29 AM
|
|
Simms is a top 5 QB in the league when healthy. If the kid needs tthe time, let him have it. I wouldn't want to trade a top 5 QB if I had one. Dacia signed for 2 years if something should go wrong next year, Simms starts for the Tampa Bat Buc's!
|
|
by Dan
|
10/11/07 09:26 AM
|
|
Garcia here to help save Gruden? How many other NFL teams would love to have Garcia? 25 of the 32 teams by my count. Now if Garcia goes down we're done. It gets old hearing fans/media bashing the Bucs brass when they're doing better than expected.
|
|
by Matt
|
10/11/07 09:05 AM
|
|
Does anyone remember Simms play in the playoff game against Washington or the games leading up to the injury?? He was absolutely terrible. He couldn't find ANY throwing lanes, and his balls were always batted down. Cut him and move on.
|
|
by Scott
|
10/11/07 08:23 AM
|
|
None of these writers at the SP Times can get their facts straight. Garcia signed a two year deal for roughly the same money as Simms. About $5M for two years. So how is Simms making $5M this year?
|
|
by Tom
|
10/11/07 08:18 AM
|
|
Enough already with the whining about what you think the GM should be telling the press. His job is to put together a winning team and if he thinks it's best to not play his hand in the press, so be it. I don't care how he does it, just win!
|
|
by Linda
|
10/11/07 08:17 AM
|
|
Why hold on to a dead log. He should never have been given the money in the 1st place. Move on guys. You have 3 GOOD GB's.
|
|
by Tony
|
10/11/07 07:57 AM
|
|
Romano, this is what you do for a living, right? Amazing! So the fans have been deceived, other NFL team may feel the Bucs fudged its IR list...are you kidding me? Sad thing is, take out that Para. and the "charade" comment and the article is good.
|
|
by paul
|
10/11/07 07:55 AM
|
|
once again the dislike for Gruden/Allen is on display. These guys are not media friendly and they get hammered because of it!! Are they really that different than other organizations?These are cold hard business decisions period! Get over it! Go Bucs
|
|
by aaron
|
10/11/07 06:13 AM
|
|
this was the right move to put him on IR. out of every qb on our roster he has the most potential to be a good qb in the nfl. he has all the tools. i sure hope the bucs dont give up on him. garcia, we all know is a band-aid, here to help save gruden
|
|
by Joern
|
10/11/07 04:55 AM
|
|
The outcome of this season will probably determine Simms future. If we go 8-8 or less, they´ll keep him for rebuilding. A playoff appearance and Gruden/Allen could let him go without too much protest.
I for one would really hate to see him go!
|
|
by Jon
|
10/11/07 01:01 AM
|
|
Ah.....More Anti-Gruden, Anti-Allen tripe. It's been awhile. Auman is the only sports writer on this page with any integrity.
|