News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Tax cut deal starts to jell
Legislative leaders back a plan that keeps Save Our Homes.
By ALEX LEARY, Times Staff Writer
Published October 11, 2007
TALLAHASSEE - It seems like a done deal.
Lawmakers meeting in special session will not take up property taxes until Friday, but leaders already have agreed to the ingredients of an $11-billion tax cut package.
New to the equation Wednesday were nearly $3-billion in additions that would eliminate property taxes for low-income seniors and provide breaks for owners of low-income housing and waterfront commercial property.
The main provisions of the deal still stand, which include doubling the $25,000 homestead exemption, allowing people to carry Save Our Homes benefits to new homes and a tax discount for first-time home buyers.
The deal will be formally outlined on Friday, as lawmakers return to Tallahassee to finish a special session on budget cuts. The session was extended through next week, with a final vote on property taxes coming as early as Wednesday.
Democrats, whose votes are needed to put the proposal on the Jan. 29 ballot, greeted the deal cautiously.
"Until we see the details and hear from the public and other stakeholders, we make absolutely no commitment," said House Democratic leader Dan Gelber of Miami Beach.
But Democrats have voiced support for most of the package because it preserves Save Our Homes and largely spares school budgets from cuts.
Gov. Charlie Crist and legislative leaders put the new proposal together after a circuit judge ruled that the language of the original plan, featuring a "super homestead exemption" was misleading because it did not plainly state that the popular Save Our Homes assessment cap would be phased out.
The governor worked aggressively on the plan in recent days, even as he acknowledged it fell short of savings under the prior proposal, which has been abandoned.
House Speaker Marco Rubio, R-Miami, applauded Crist's "extraordinary leadership" but alluded repeatedly to those lower expectations while detailing $3-billion in additions to the governor's five-year outline.
Doubling the homestead exemption, for example, would result in just over $200 a year in savings for the average homeowner. And the plan does little for businesses and second-home owners - groups that have absorbed the brunt of the tax burden in recent years.
"This is a time for candor," Rubio told reporters. "It would serve no one too stand up here and say this is the best plan ever."
There is an Oct. 30 deadline for putting a proposed constitutional amendment on the Jan. 29 ballot.
As it stands now, the plan includes these provisions:
1. The homestead exemption, now $25,000, would go to a maximum of $50,000. But it's not that simple. Most homeowners would get the full $50,000 exemption. But to help poorer counties with lots of inexpensive homes, the extra $25,000 exemption would apply only to assessment amounts from $50,000 to $75,000. So, for instance, the owner of a house worth $35,000 would pay taxes on $10,000.
2. Save Our Homes would be made portable. All of the accrued benefit (up to $1-million) could be transferred to a more expensive home. Homeowners who downsize would pay taxes on the same percentage of market value as they did on their old home. This increased exemption would not apply to school millages.
3. First-time homesteaders would get an exemption equal to 25 percent of the market value of the property, within certain limits. The exemption would be phased out over time, as the homeowner increasingly benefitted from Save Our Homes.
None of these exemptions affect property taxes for schools.
4. Property taxes would be eliminated for low-income seniors. The exemption would apply to seniors who qualify for the existing $50,000 additional local option homestead exemption. To qualify now, the individual must be 65 or older and have a household income of less than $24,214.
5. The amendment would eliminate the presumption of correctness given to property appraisers for challenges to assessments involving properties whose just value increases more than the average for their class.
6. Several provisions of the Legislature's original tax cut plan are retained, including:
-An exemption for the first $25,000 of tangible personal property. Many small businesses and mobile home owners would no longer have to pay tangible taxes.
-A provision allowing property used for affordable housing to be assessed at less than just value. To qualify, the property would have to be subject to rent restrictions imposed by a government authority.
-The working waterfronts provision, which would allow property located on the water and used for commercial activities to be assessed according to its actual use, rather than the now legally required "highest and best" use.
FAST FACTS
Main provisions
1. Save Our Homes benefit is retained -you could take it with you if you move.
2. Maximum homestead exemption would go from $25,000 to $50,000.
3. First-time buyers get an exemption of up to 25% of a home's market value.
4. Property taxes eliminated for low-income seniors (household income under $24,214).
5. Property appraisers lose "presumption of correctness" when their assessments are appealed.
[Last modified October 11, 2007, 00:00:02]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by s. lee
|
10/12/07 11:31 AM
|
|
END PROPERTY TAXES NOW -
VISIT WWW.FLORIDABALLOTINITIATIVE.COM
AND SIGN THE PETITIONS.
WE CAN DO THIS. THE POLITICIANS OBVIOUSLY CANNOT.
|
|
by SHERRY
|
10/12/07 11:30 AM
|
|
TO BRIAN: What about people who didn't WANT to move? It's not just value that determines your tax bill. Its the tax rate set by cities and counties. They didn't lower it when values shot up, STEALING from us to triple their budgets, forcing us out.
|
|
by Doug
|
10/12/07 10:33 AM
|
|
This is not totally clear weather we will the 3% cap remains in effect for new homeowners as well. This language is as vague as the last bill that was stuck down.
|
|
by Brian
|
10/11/07 10:42 PM
|
|
You can't have it both ways folks. You can't be thrilled that your housing price has skyrocketed in recent years making you money when you sell and then get upset with the property appraiser uses the appraisal to calculate your taxes.
|
|
by Bree
|
10/11/07 09:54 PM
|
|
More & more people are leaving Florida! What happened to taxes are going to drop like a rock Charlie Crist?
|
|
by Terryl Delaney
|
10/11/07 09:34 PM
|
|
It's time for a tea party in Tallahassee. Forget party lines. Vote against any politician who doesn't vote for fair and equitable taxes for everyone. Unemployed politicians send a powerful message to those who want to stay in office.
|
|
by Jose
|
10/11/07 07:17 PM
|
|
Florida has been living on Good Weather and Credit for decades, and now the Bill is due.
|
|
by alex
|
10/11/07 07:02 PM
|
|
I'll vote for it - because of portability. we are stuck in our home, and want to move, we can't sell our home to buy the other place because no one can afford taxes on our current house.this should help the market
|
|
by Shannon
|
10/11/07 04:56 PM
|
|
This does nothing to help me, as we moved into a larger home a year ago and lost the Cap. Our takes (on a home 3 doors down form old one) went from $1800 to almost $5000. Let me retroact the Cap, and then I will praise your effort!
|
|
by Mike
|
10/11/07 04:55 PM
|
|
The problem was caused by local governments spending the excess money collected from the few on the wants of the many. Instead of reducing the tax for individual homeowners, the budgets should be capped.
|
|
by Sheriff
|
10/11/07 04:35 PM
|
|
Say good bye to public safety. You cant run law enforcement or Fire/rescue on the bare bones budgets these cuts would force. EXEMPT PUBLIC SAFETY or lose all security.
|
|
by Aquaserpent
|
10/11/07 03:53 PM
|
|
The jokes on all of you, read the fine print! Whit the cap gone in 10 years you will be paying double what you will pay on the current system, and that is only if inflation stays at 3%, anything higher and the saving will disapear faster.
|
|
by Common Sense
|
10/11/07 03:08 PM
|
|
This is junk. Let's stop play games, get rid of the exemptions and save our homes nonsense, and go to a low flat rate. It's really not very complicated and eliminates targeting favors to some people.
|
|
by Sandy
|
10/11/07 02:51 PM
|
|
You maybe saving $600 on your property tax to give it to your homeowner's insurance co.
|
|
by G. Will Akerz
|
10/11/07 02:25 PM
|
|
Great! Taxes down $529.30. Hazard up $586.56. Utilities up 5% ($85.69). Gas up 107% ($1040). Compared to last year I am only $2222.95 down. Geeeez! I'd be better off living under the interstate with a cardborad sign. I'am totally underwhelmed. Thanks
|
|
by Davy
|
10/11/07 01:35 PM
|
|
I would like to see a roll back to 2001, and start from there, Property Apr need to be in check. I may lose property because of incresed apr.one has gone up 1000% in 10 years and it's 510 sq. ft.rent dosn't cover taxes let alone Insurance. HELP Soon!
|
|
by Jeff
|
10/11/07 01:01 PM
|
|
And even better this bill actually has a chance to pass! Even though I was fully behind the super exemption I had wondered if it would really pass. I have full faith that this one will.
|
|
by Chris
|
10/11/07 12:28 PM
|
|
It saves me $600- it's a start.
|
|
by Shana
|
10/11/07 12:21 PM
|
|
I would save about $600 on my property taxes. It's the non-ad valorem assessments that get me. While the super exemption would be nice, I'll gladly take the $600.
|
|
by michael
|
10/11/07 12:21 PM
|
|
As usual, politicians have given birth to a mouse after promising a mountain.
Save our home is there more than ever and adding to the unfairness to many.
What a deal!!! They could have saved their grandstanding. They are simply courting VOTES.
|
|
by Becca
|
10/11/07 12:12 PM
|
|
Home sales should pick up once this is finally decided. Anumber of psiople I know are waiting to see if their SOH can be transferred as paying the present $2000 tax on a home is alot more attractive and affordable then current $4000 on a new home.
|
|
by Jeff
|
10/11/07 11:47 AM
|
|
Guys do some homework. IN pin/hills the mileage rate is around 2% thus a 25,000 exemption saves us 500 dollars. In my case my mileage rate is 2.2% so I will save 550 dollars. This is not bad.
|
|
by Frustrated
|
10/11/07 11:21 AM
|
|
Don't these people in Tallh know that the greedier they get the less they make as more people lose their homes and move out of FL. It's better to get something vs nothing - increase sales tax - then we really own our homes!
|
|
by bob
|
10/11/07 11:04 AM
|
|
this sucks ! The super exemption would have saved me 240 per month, now I am going to get maybe 20 less per month. This type of relief is why the real estate market stinks and it won't improve without real relief.
|
|
by James
|
10/11/07 11:00 AM
|
|
The "Cartwheel Party" on my front lawn scheduled for January 30th has been cancelled. The new property tax plan savings to me will no longer pay for the cost of resodding. I'll be returning my "stretchy pants" and "superdouper toupae glue" to Walmart
|
|
by suse
|
10/11/07 10:59 AM
|
|
How much is this going to save me? $16 a month? It's simple people, elimiate property tax, raise sales tax 2% - let the tourist help pay. SOH is not the problem - taxes are too high period- hello? I am voting 'NO' to this proposal, wake up people!
|
|
by sambo
|
10/11/07 10:37 AM
|
|
SEEMS FAIR TO ME ITS A DONE DEAL
LIVE WITH IT,IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT MOVE FROM FLORIDA.LETS THANK MARC RUBIO,HE WOULD MAKE AN EXCELLENT GOVERNOR OR MAYBE A VICE PRESIDENTWITH RUDY.IT EVEN SOUNDS GOOD RUDY&RUBIO 08
|
|
by Mark
|
10/11/07 10:34 AM
|
|
I just did the math on a doubling the home exemption, I will save $529 a year in taxes, not $200. I am all for it.
|
|
by Boris
|
10/11/07 10:31 AM
|
|
What exactly does provision 1 (portability) mean? How it will be applied to a more expensive house I moved to?
Second question: What is the effective date of the new tax law? Does it apply to the 2007 tax?
|
|
by Relieved
|
10/11/07 10:27 AM
|
|
Okay... I see... it's waterfront "Commercial" property they're talking about... I was quite irate at the prospect of a tax break for a home used for private dwelling on the water.
|
|
by Extremely Irate
|
10/11/07 10:21 AM
|
|
I wonder how much it costs for these "special sessions"... I'll bet the legislature got an increase this year unlike state gvt. workers who can't afford their mortgages and would love to have a home period let alone one on the water. Hmmm...
|
|
by The working poor
|
10/11/07 10:17 AM
|
|
State gvt. is in a hiring freeze & my dept didn't get a pay raise this year, yet my H.O. insurance and taxes went up! God knows I don't live on the water. This will do nothing to help me. Instead lets help the poor soul with waterfront property.
|
|
by P.Rainsong
|
10/11/07 10:12 AM
|
|
If you can afford a home on the water, why can't you afford the taxes? Instead buy a home that isn't on the water. God knows there are plenty for sale. I work for state gvt. and didn't get a pay raise this year. I can hardly afford my H.O. taxes.
|
|
by Abe
|
10/11/07 10:07 AM
|
|
Instead of attacking this from the valuation side voters need ask why county commissioners are not lowering our mileage rate as values go up (what are they doing with the increase in total revenue) and those who don't lower the mileage get voted out.
|
|
by Bland
|
10/11/07 10:06 AM
|
|
SOH was meant to control out of control spending. Blaming the method of how taxpayers are taxed as opposed to the exponential spending increases has always been the wrong reason. True portability, without limits, will cause some positive activity.
|