St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

GOP hopeful floats on despite odds

Ron Paul is far behind in presidential polls, but a go-it-alone style endears him to backers.

By AARON SHAROCKMAN, Times Staff Writer
Published October 15, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT
photo
[AP photo]
Though a registered Republican, Ron Paul is considered a libertarian. He was the Libertarian Party's nominee for president in 1988, winning 432,000 votes. His guiding philosophy is libertarian principle No. 1: If it doesn't say so in the Constitution, don't support it


When the GOP's nine presidential hopefuls lined up to debate in Detroit last week, Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson and Rudy Giuliani were funneled to the center of the auditorium.

Next came John McCain, followed on either side by a congressman from California, the former governor of Arkansas and a senator from Kansas.

At the end of the stage, almost out of sight, organizers tucked in Ron Paul, a gaunt, grumpy, 10-term congressman from southeast Texas.

None of it was by accident.

Paul, a 72-year-old pro-gun, antiabortion, antiwar, anti-Medicare, libertarian-leaning constitutionalist, should by most objective measures be a presidential afterthought by now.

National polls place him in the GOP's bottom tier, with between 1 percent and 2 percent support. His base partly consists of -- in no particular order -- people who want prostitution legalized, taxpayers who oppose paying taxes, a white supremacist running for the Florida state House, and those who think the Sept. 11 attacks were a government conspiracy.

But there's something about the Texas Republican's long-shot candidacy that has attracted a feverish following. He is one of the most popular candidates on the Internet, and raised a hefty $5-million from July to September.

And he is the only Republican candidate who consistently and openly opposes the war in Iraq.

His patchwork of supporters call it the Ron Paul Revolution. Its leader is a great-grandfather and obstetrician whose stump speech can resemble an economics lecture, not graceful oratory.

Who is Ron Paul?

Ron Paul was born in Pennsylvania, attended medical school at Duke and was first elected to Congress in 1976. Before this year, most people had never heard of him.

Paul Bourgeois didn't know who Paul was six months ago. Now Bourgeois leads a 216-member Clearwater grass roots group backing the candidate.

The quick courtship, which came without aid from Paul's skeleton campaign, underscores the improbability of Paul's growing national presence.

Bourgeois' Palm Harbor furniture store doubles these days as the impromptu Pinellas campaign headquarters. Patrons can buy a bed, or a campaign T-shirt.

"I've never done anything like this before," said Bourgeois, 35. "But Dr. Paul is the man."

Though a registered Republican, Paul is considered a libertarian. He was the Libertarian Party's nominee for president in 1988, winning 432,000 votes. His guiding philosophy is libertarian principle No. 1: If it doesn't say so in the Constitution, don't support it - which explains why Paul opposes Medicare, for example.

Such views have earned him a cultlike following, particularly online.

"Most Americans are libertarian in what they believe. They just won't vote libertarian," said Andre Morrou, Paul's running mate in 1988. "Ron being a Republican makes it easier."

Paul has 47,251 members on the grass roots Web site Meetup.com, 10 times more than the next closest candidate, Barack Obama, and he has more than 69,000 "friends" on the community network Myspace.com.

Eliminate paper money

People may see Paul as honest because no one who really wants to become president would do or say what he does.

Paul has introduced legislation four times since 1999 to abolish the Federal Reserve. He supports reinstituting a decades-old policy of linking the dollar to gold and silver his personal wealth of $1.5-million to $4-million is largely in gold and silver.

And in June, he introduced a bill that would eliminate the need for paper money altogether. "Individuals acting through the market will determine what is money," he said on the House floor. The bill never got a vote.

"I cringe whenever I hear Ron talk," said Bruce Bartlett, a former Paul congressional aide and Treasury Department official. "But that's part of his charm. It's the thing that validates he's genuine. Clearly, no sensible person who is trying to win would say any of these things."

In Congress, Paul opposes resolutions that try to tell another country what to do. He has been called "Dr. No" for so often being the lone dissenter in the 435-member House. He would not express support for freedom in Hong Kong (426-1), a call for free elections in Azerbaijan (416-1) or Belarus (419-1), nor condemn Kim Jong Il for the North Korean government's abduction of foreign citizens (362-1).

He voted against awarding a congressional gold medal to Rosa Parks (424-1) and also has fought medals for Pope John Paul II (416-1) and Ronald Reagan (350-8). Paul does not oppose the honor; he thinks the $30,000 expense is a waste.

Serving a House district with a sizable farm industry, Paul opposes subsidies. In a district near the Johnson Space Center, Paul objects to funding NASA.

"There aren't Ron Paul dams and bridges and overpasses across the district," said Kerry Neves, the Republican Party chairman in Galveston County, which is part of Paul's district.

And though his "rugged honesty," as one Republican Party official put it, is endearing him to a menagerie of political misfits and castoffs, it may be trouble when it comes time to run for reelection in the House. Three Republicans are planning to challenge him in a primary, including a former aide who recently called Paul a "nutcase."

Another challenger, Chris Peden, a council member from the Texas town of Friendswood, says Paul's libertarian postures are catching up with him in the conservative cattle ranches of his home state.

"A lot of the grass roots activists here have seen him for what he is now, and they are alarmed," Peden said. "People are really getting tired of it."

Upset or also-ran?

It's hard to measure the popularity of Paul's candidacy. On the Internet, he's a superstar. Anecdotally, he's surging.

But in old-fashioned polling, he's what pundits always thought he would be - an also-ran. History says he has no shot.

"Every once in a while you get someone who's kind of a protest candidate," said Mark Rozell, a presidential scholar at George Mason University. "Ron Paul is a vehicle for people to express their discontent in the Republicans.

"It's a safe protest vote because it seems like he doesn't have a chance to win. But it still sends a message."

Bartlett, the former aide who now lives in Virginia, said he will likely vote for Paul "for old times' sake."

"We may have to wait until there's an honest to goodness real vote before we realize if there's support or not," Bartlett said. "But Ron may be getting his 15 minutes right about now."

Aaron Sharockman can be reached at asharockman@sptimes.com or (727) 892-2273.

Ron Paul

Born: Aug. 20, 1935

Party: Republican

Occupation: Congressman, Texas 14th District

Web site: www.ronpaul2008.com

Money raised: $8-million (est.)

Platform: Abolish the IRS, end the Iraq war 

Paul on the Issues

On immigration: No amnesty, end birthright citizenship.

On the war in Iraq: Bring the troops home, no future wars without the authorization of Congress.

On guns: Opposes most gun control measures; believes guns should be allowed on college campuses, national parks and with pilots.

On taxes: Eliminate the IRS and Federal Reserve; supports eliminating the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Education.

On abortion: Pro-life.

 

[Last modified October 14, 2007, 22:02:41]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by luke 01/16/08 04:22 AM
how did ron paul earn his wealth
by sandy 12/30/07 09:58 PM
WHERE is this store in clearwater??
by Dale 12/18/07 12:20 PM
Larken Rose thinks you have been reading his book "How to be a Successful Tyrant" http://www.tyrantbook.com/ I found your article via his newsletter: http://www.synapticsparks.info/LarkenRose/116.txt
by David 11/06/07 08:08 PM
On November 5, Paul's supporters raised over $4 million -- breaking the one-day record of any other Republican
by B 11/05/07 01:25 AM
Obviously the rule of law has become unpopular to those who cannot survive without a tyrannical lawless government giving them handouts of phony money to write hit pieces on those with true integrity. Aaron, you are truly the bottom of the barrel.
by AL 10/24/07 10:38 PM
A plain and simple constitutionist and statesman dedicated to protecting our sacred liberty and honoring that which once made this a great nation - the people; not the big busines corporate interest and banksters. I wish him God's speed.
by Mikehunt 10/23/07 07:52 PM
This is the worst article I have ever read. I hope Paul wins.
by Chris 10/22/07 12:19 PM
"I cringe whenever I see SHAROCKMAN write." On the bright side, a blatent hit peice such as this only highlights the real threat Ron Paul poses of winning in the primaries. Obviously he has neo-conservatives increasingly alarmed.
by Ed 10/21/07 08:04 PM
Ron Paul supporters are far more in number than an anyone imagines, because except for Dennis Kucinnich, all the other candidates are as scary as Bush to many Americans. We want our freedom back! Support our troops, give them a raise.
by Wes 10/21/07 02:09 AM
In regards to his popularity in Texas... it cant be that bad because the people keep voting him back!!!
by nuthinbutnet 10/21/07 12:19 AM
As for the prostitution claim, where did you get that from? You really had to did deep. That is so pitiful, you just blew your cred right out the window. People see you for what you are and what it is. A pitiful piece of work.
by Matt 10/20/07 06:00 PM
Aaron you should be ashamed of yourself. When you were young and dreamed of being a writer, did you envision penning this embarrassment? I am canceling my subscription today.
by Jeremy 10/20/07 07:59 AM
Your 'inbox' full yet, Schmuckman?
by Stuart 10/19/07 11:31 PM
Ron Paul voted against Reagan's congressional medal because he wanted to pay for it out of his own pocket, instead of making the taxpayers foot the bill. He offered up his $100 share and everyone else said no way.
by JonnyAmerican 10/19/07 11:14 PM
Man you gettin slammed by every single comment, guess its time for the MSM to surrender to the will of the people!
by Chris 10/19/07 10:33 PM
Excellent piece! We need to know more about insignificant candidates....
by Brian 10/19/07 09:44 PM
Hey AARON SHAROCKMAN when the dollar tanks R.P. will be laughing at your poor @$$ with his inflation proof investment. Do you like giving the govt 25% ? I guess u donò019t like to be responsible for your own lfe and rather some on else think for you.
by Brian 10/19/07 07:30 PM
Aaron Sharockman = Loser
by Henry 10/19/07 04:34 PM
If Ron Paul is so insignificant, why did you feel it necessary to run such hit piece on him? Why did you feel it necessary to lie about the poll results? Face it, you and your government masters are scared silly of him.
by Tim 10/19/07 03:23 PM
Shill hit piece disguised as journalism. No wonder why the MSM is being taken over by the blogs.
by Don 10/19/07 02:16 PM
For many years newspaper and TV coverage have determined who is an acceptable candidate. Big money buys that kind of influence. A successful Internet-based campaign template is a mortal challenge for old media. That is why Ron Paul is being smeared.
by Jason 10/19/07 02:08 PM
Wow! You call yourself a journalist saying things like this? I honestly want to know how many e-mails you get from this. Let us all know! You just hit a hornets nest with a stick dude. Don't complain when you get stung! (with e-mails, not physically)
by Dominic 10/19/07 01:29 PM
Dr. Paul is the only candidate proposing decentralization of government power, which means empowerment of individuals and communities. Life is organized similarly. Ron Paul speaks from his heart and people can feel it. They can also feels your lies.
by CJ 10/19/07 12:54 PM
The only word that comes to mind is "pitiful". I certainly hope you aren't paid more than minimum wage for throwing this hit piece together.
by TJ 10/18/07 11:53 PM
Yellow journalists like Sharockman and pretentious rags like the Times bear much responsibility for leading a once great nation into the abyss.
by Jeff 10/18/07 11:38 PM
You and your fellow "journalists", are why mainstream media is failing. The only reason I'm reading your garbage is because it was linked to by www.whatreallyhappened.com. Think about another career choice while standing in the unemployment line.
by Daniel 10/18/07 11:38 PM
I have been an award-winning writer-editor-journalist for twenty years. Mr. Shrockman, your column is not journalism. If it is, and you can prove it, then I'll eat your newspaper. I've got a feeling, though, that it will taste very yellow. Cheers
by Woody 10/18/07 10:25 PM
What a load of garbage you have just made me cancel my subscription to the St Pete Times. Ron Paul obviously has the sheeple like you in the mainstream media running scared.
by john 10/18/07 10:23 PM
An honest man does not have a chance against all the crooks
by Mark 10/18/07 10:06 PM
"If it doesn't say so in the Constitution, don't support it..." The horror. How absurd. Following ones oath of office. What is this world coming to?
by tony 10/18/07 09:55 PM
c'mon! this is why your business is going down the way its going! where's the impartiality? where is the balanced reporting? I hope you end up flipping burgers, considering how you do your job now.
by Scot 10/18/07 09:50 PM
Dishonest. The writer listed ideas held by some of Dr. Paul's supporters, but to my knowledge he does not "want prostitution legalized", "oppose paying taxes", or think "the Sept. 11 attacks were a government conspiracy". Shame on the writer!
by Rick 10/18/07 09:48 PM
Finally, people are thinking for themselves, and dismissing hit pieces like this. For once, people are figuring things out for themselves. Clearly the Times has an agenda. Way to Fudge the numbers as I don't know what polls this guy is reading.
by boo boo 10/18/07 09:41 PM
Why is the media so against this guy??? GOOGLE RON PAUL!!! I think it's time for a HUGE CHANGE and I'm not talking ripping up the constitution!
by Fraser 10/18/07 09:38 PM
when will you americans get it right? This is the ONLY honest person that you should trust. WAKE UP.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT