News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Slow down tax cut train
By A TIMES EDITORIAL
Published October 17, 2007
This is what passes for a thoughtful, reasonable approach in the Florida Legislature: Unveil on Friday a complicated tax-reform bill negotiated in secret. Talk about it on Monday in a couple of committees whose members have many questions but few answers. Make substantial changes before rushing it through the committees on Tuesday, and send it to the full House and Senate for a possible vote today.
That is neither thoughtful nor reasonable, but the Republican-controlled Legislature isn't concerned with appearances. Its obsession with tax cuts regardless of the consequences prevents rational discussion about creating a fairer system. If the Democrats could find their spine and weren't so petrified of being portrayed as pro-tax, they would slow things down and block efforts to put a new constitutional amendment on the Jan. 29 ballot until sanity returns.
The more the tax-cut package is held up to the light of public scrutiny and debated, the greater the flaws and the political pandering. For example, Republicans initially emphasized that education would not be affected by the tax cuts. It turns out that's not true. Education would not be affected by adding an additional $25,000 homestead exemption and granting homeowners the ability to take a Save Our Homes tax break with them when they moved. But public education could lose more than $2-billion over four years because of other provisions, including a new property tax break for low-income seniors. A promise to make that money up another way in an uncertain economy is simply not enough.
Even more offensive is another portion of the constitutional amendment that would REQUIRE the Legislature to limit increases in local property taxes. That is a power grab that violates another section of the constitution granting local governments the authority to levy property taxes. Home rule would be history, and the Legislature would become everyone's city council and county commission. Republicans contend they have to take control of local taxes because local officials have acted irresponsibly. There already is a remedy for that: local elections.
Then there is the brazen hypocrisy. Here's a Legislature that raised more than a half-billion dollars in local property taxes for education last spring complaining about local government living off higher property values. Here's a Legislature that routinely transfers responsibilities and new requirements to local government without sending any state money now demanding that cities and counties get by on even less. To see irresponsible politicians, state lawmakers have only to look in the mirror.
Florida TaxWatch, The Florida Retail Federation, the Florida Chamber of Commerce and the Florida Association of Realtors have all warned that this tax-cut package does little for business owners, renters and owners of investment properties who aren't protected by Save Our Homes and have been hard-hit by rising property values. But legislators can't even address that without grandstanding.
Rep. Ron Saunders, D-Key West, offered a reasonable 7 percent cap on assessed value on nonhomesteaded property Tuesday. The Republicans trumped it with a 3 percent cap without a clue about the cost, members of both parties embraced it, and it will be considered by the full House today. Blindly bidding up tax cuts in a partisan poker game only raises unreasonable expectations by taxpayers who have been disappointed too many times.
This train is moving too fast, but most Republicans could care less. That leaves it up to Democrats to slow things down. They don't have enough votes to defeat these schemes on their merits, but they have enough to prevent placing an amendment on the Jan. 29 ballot. They should use that leverage to insist that each tax-cut is well-vetted before lawmakers vote - and that the worst of the bunch are discarded.
[Last modified October 16, 2007, 21:01:55]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Kay
|
10/18/07 12:59 AM
|
|
Pete, why should you have services from city without help paying? I assume you are a renter.
|
|
by Bill
|
10/17/07 08:43 PM
|
|
The real estate tax should be completely reworked & shared equally by everyone that pays taxes this year & in the future. Fifty (.50) cents /sq. ft. on living space would be fair for everyone & shortfalls made up with a slight increase in sales tax.
|
|
by Pete
|
10/17/07 10:47 AM
|
|
by dale Why should I have to pay more sales tax, so you can pay less property tax. 7% is high but add another couple cents and it will be higher to buy gas, and other needed items just so you can get a break. Soon they willbe taxing electricity water
|
|
by Casey
|
10/17/07 10:36 AM
|
|
The liberal Times is out of touch with the people. We want & demand immediate relief. The Republicans are answering the call of people unlike the tax & spend democrats trying to stall.
|
|
by jake
|
10/17/07 10:34 AM
|
|
GEEZER, are you nuts? We need tax relief now, not wait wait wait.
If anything, this plan does not nearly give enough relief.
|
|
by Marie
|
10/17/07 09:51 AM
|
|
This is not a partisen thing, the plan in place just does not make fiscal sense and is not fair to all. We need a tax system that is fair to everyone, not just long term homeowners or seniors. Take the time to really think it through and get a PLAN.
|
|
by JT
|
10/17/07 09:26 AM
|
|
State Legislature cannot make good candidate run for local offices which do not pay enough to live on and in many places are truly full time jobs. They can serve as a check against them when it is obvious the system is being gamed by well connected
|
|
by geezer
|
10/17/07 08:47 AM
|
|
I agree with the article. How are the voters supposed to make an intelligent decision without knowing the true cost? They are racing to put it on the primary ballot because they know fewer people vote in the primary. Aim for the general election.
|
|
by captn obvious
|
10/17/07 07:58 AM
|
|
to add one more note, when you finally realize there is no difference between house parties, you will realize thats all a game they play to mess with your head and keep you guessing.
|
|
by captn obvious
|
10/17/07 07:57 AM
|
|
john - do you honestly still believe there is a difference between dem and repb. anymore? they are all in the pocket of the insurance companies and corporations. wake up its 2007 not 1954 guy.
|
|
by dale
|
10/17/07 07:49 AM
|
|
If the Democrats drag their feet on this issue and come Jan 29 this is left off the ballot, I will not only not vote for one Democrats but will drop out of the party. The solution is so simple raise the sales tax, left everyone pay Their Fair Share!!
|
|
by stpete
|
10/17/07 07:23 AM
|
|
Amen. The people who really need the tax cuts are those who bought primary homes in the last three years. Everyone else is either homesteaded or with a luxury second home. Don't cuttaxes and sacrifice my quality of life b/c homesteaders wanteven more
|
|
by John
|
10/17/07 02:49 AM
|
|
WARNING: Democrats that vote to derail meaningful & substantial property tax relief (as demanded by the people) will have their chamber votes recorded & will be targeted to be voted out of office at next election!! Go against the will of the people-
|
|
by John
|
10/17/07 02:34 AM
|
|
....Nothing will change with more time. The true question is: Are you truely for giving meaningful property tax relief or not? It looks like the Republican House is for relief & the Democrats are stalling and do not want to cut local gov't spending.
|