News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Scam artist wants a break
Peter Porcelli says he deserves leniency for his cooperation.
By JEFF TESTERMAN, Times Staff Writer
Published October 29, 2007
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[The Appleton Post-Crescent]
Peter Porcelli, right, poured $500,000 a year into his Tampa Bay Smokers, a fast-pitch softball team that won world championships in 1996 and 1998.
|
|
TAMPA - Telemarketing tycoon Peter Porcelli, who collected millions by using a credit card scam to defraud thousands of hard-luck consumers across the country, now faces the prospect of spending the next 20 years in federal prison.
But the 55-year-old Oldsmar resident says he deserves leniency. The reasons he gives: He is cooperating with a grand jury investigation in Tampa. The seriousness of his crimes has been overstated. And he has begun his own rehabilitation by halting his marijuana use after a 38-year addiction.
"Basically, I'll be hat in hand to get whatever relief I can from the judge," said his attorney, Ronald Cacciatore.
Porcelli's sentencing is scheduled this afternoon in East St. Louis, Ill. He is to be sentenced for conspiracy, mail fraud and wire fraud in connection with a telemarketing operation that targeted consumers with credit problems with phony promises for a MasterCard for a fee of $159 to $200.
The operation, with headquarters in Largo, used teams of telemarketers in boiler rooms in the United States, Canada, the Caribbean and India, and defrauded more than 165,000 people, according to charges Porcelli pleaded guilty to in May. Victims who thought they were paying for a MasterCard ended up with a dummy card backed with a phony magnetic strip, while Porcelli and his associates made off with $12.5-million, according to court records.
Porcelli bought a $6.27-million Belleair mansion and poured $500,000 a year into his Tampa Bay Smokers, a fast-pitch softball team that won world championships in 1996 and 1998.
Now, as the government seeks to put him behind bars for a term of between 151/2 and 191/2 years, Porcelli is jockeying to reduce his prison time, pointing to his cooperation with an ongoing criminal investigation by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Tampa.
The investigation, begun by U.S. Postal Inspectors and the Department of Financial Services, focuses on credit counseling and mortgage loans by the Safe Harbour Foundation and Silverstone Lending, which Porcelli and others set up in 2005.
According to a federal lawsuit filed by several homeowners this month, Safe Harbour used false promises to attract homeowners hit with foreclosure, then referred them to Silverstone, which used illegal fees and usurious interest rates to "steal the equity in their homes."
Regarding the telemarketing charges, Porcelli argues that federal officials have overstated the seriousness of his offense by highlighting the number of victims and total amount taken. He contends that the typical victim lost no more than $200, so no one was driven to the poorhouse.
"This is not a situation where anyone was left destitute," Cacciatore said.
Moreover, Porcelli says only a small percentage of the $12.5-million stolen in the telemarketing scheme went into his pocket.
Large amounts of cash went into "the payment of salaries of employees who believed they were operating and working in a legal and legitimate business," Cacciatore says in his motion.
Additionally, the lawyer says, 75 to 85 percent of the gross receipts realized in the telemarketing fraud were paid not to Porcelli but to Assail Inc., a Nevada corporation that partnered with Porcelli in the offer of bogus credit cards.
Cacciatore also says that Porcelli has taken an important step in his rehabilitation by overcoming a long-standing addiction to marijuana. Porcelli used marijuana "almost on a daily basis since he was 17," Cacciatore says, but stopped using it in April, after his initial court appearance on the fraud charges.
Said Cacciatore: "For someone to have an addiction for that long and to go cold turkey, I think is very remarkable."
Jeff Testerman can be reached at 813 226-3422 or testerman@sptimes.com
[Last modified October 28, 2007, 20:48:57]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Betty
|
01/25/08 12:38 PM
|
|
Why does this have to be a prison situation? i would think not. The offense is not serious and we need prisons for violent people who are a danger on the outside.
|
|
by BARB
|
01/25/08 08:19 AM
|
|
PRISON IS FOR REAL CRIMINALS! NOT FOR SOMEBODY LIKE HIM WHO JUST TRIPPED UP IN BUSINESS! HOW COME THIS STORY DID NOT SHOW THAT? BE FAIR NEXT TIME!
|
|
by Eddie
|
01/25/08 08:16 AM
|
|
The man didnt cost anyone much.You dont take people like this and incarcerate them, you let them work their way back!Give him a good rehab and some supervision and he is good as new soon.
leave the prison sentences to those like Michael Vick.
|
|
by Nelson
|
01/25/08 08:08 AM
|
|
He gets charged with much more than he is guilty of, then he shows his good will by overcoming the problem he has had for seventeen years.I can see where this gets him in line for some leniency for sure.Let's not blow this.House arrest for six months
|
|
by Jennifer
|
01/25/08 08:01 AM
|
|
I think the focus should be on the man, Mr.Porcelli,not the responders.One thing i agree with is the seriousness of the offense is very much overstated and that alone is the real story. He might be suited for a 5 year probation and some restitution.
|
|
by FREDDY
|
01/25/08 08:00 AM
|
|
THE TIME IS HERE FOR TREATMENT OF HIS PROBLEMS AND DO NOT SHIP HIM OFF TO PRISON
|
|
by Tabatha
|
01/25/08 07:58 AM
|
|
when do we finally start giving the proper attention to those who demonstrate the desire to become better human's? I do not agree with everythig he has done, but I also do not agree with lambasting him in the paper. He should receive probation 2yrs.
|
|
by Kenny
|
01/25/08 07:53 AM
|
|
when I read about this a few years ago, I was stunned. Now this has made me angry that the defendant gets so much negative press.He didn't even make the sales and the reporting is as bad as the government's prosecution.Hideous and unfair.Work release
|
|
by Stephen
|
01/25/08 07:47 AM
|
|
If there is one thing we can count on, it is the fact that Mr. Porcelli has shown some real courage in the face of his sentencing and that the portrayal by the newspaper is not going to match his class and poise.He should receive probation for a year
|
|
by TORRANCE
|
01/24/08 11:07 PM
|
|
WHAT HAPPENED TO JUSTICE TEMPERED WITH MERCY?THIS ATTORNEY MAKES A COMPELLING CASE. I DO NOT LIKE STORIES LIKE THIS.WE SHOULD TAKE THE HIGH ROAD AND SO SHOULD THE JUDGE. COMMUNITY SERVICE FOR SIX MONTHS, NO MORE.
|
|
by Harlan
|
01/24/08 05:47 PM
|
|
Hard luck consumers didn't even feel the loss of a few dollars but the government has treated this like the theft of the atom bomb. We should object to anything that calls for our tax dollars to jail him as that would be overkill and we won't have it
|
|
by Sandra
|
01/24/08 11:36 AM
|
|
I have never dealt with the man or any of his companies.I think that criminals should be punished. So if this man has truly done what the story says when you filter out the drug lament, he should have to be on probation for sure, and maybe pay money.
|
|
by Howard
|
01/24/08 11:33 AM
|
|
We have to hope that the justice system will do the right thing and take into acccount the seriousnes of the crime or what we do will be the next thing they crack down on.This is not bank robbery, no manslaughter.Be fair.House arrest 5 years maximum.
|
|
by Tucker
|
01/24/08 11:30 AM
|
|
This does not merit anything like the article is saying. What, send a guy who beats customers for 200 dollars to jail? c'mon, this is petty stuff and we have much more important things to worry about in spite of the reporter's overzealous effort here
|
|
by Dudley
|
01/24/08 10:35 AM
|
|
Maybe is society does the right thing in this case and gives him community service instead of a harsh sentence we move forward in the right direction.It is clearly the way to go when their is a good individual like Porcelli on the hot seat.Help him.
|
|
by Christine
|
01/24/08 10:33 AM
|
|
We should listen to what the attorney for Porcelli says.He is cooperating and the punishment he will get is way too much for what he has done.Also he has given up the addiction.The judge should listen to that and give him probation at the very worst!
|
|
by Wanda
|
01/24/08 10:29 AM
|
|
When you look at the seriousness of the offense,and look at what went on after you read up on everyone,Porcelli deserves to be congratulated for cooperating and also for giving up his drug.It translates into house arrest for 1 yr and restitution only
|
|
by Heather
|
01/24/08 10:15 AM
|
|
The worst part of any proceeding like this is the difficulty in being fair.Many will scream for blood,but in this case it is clear that leniency is called for because he is so deserving.He should get some community swervice but no confinement,period!
|
|
by Alicia
|
01/24/08 10:12 AM
|
|
What right did the writer have to expose all the personal issues of Mr. Porcelli and call him a"Scam Artist?" From what I can see this clouds any fair treatment for the man.Therefore I hope he gets minimal probation or supervised release,deservingly.
|
|
by Cheryl
|
01/24/08 10:03 AM
|
|
Porcelli has stepped up and taken responsibility. I do not know him, but I respect the fact he has put his faith in the justice system.Now it is up to the system to treat him fairly. He should have house arrest and then some reasonable fine to repay.
|
|
by Reilly
|
01/24/08 10:00 AM
|
|
Bully for the attorney who spoke up for his client and shame on the put down in the article. What is needed in this situation is some good old compassion we as a society have been sadly lacking.We have the perfect person to show it to so get with it!
|
|
by ARREST
|
01/24/08 09:57 AM
|
|
TIME IS RIGHT TO SHOW THIS MAN MERCY AND GIVE HIM A SECOND CHANCE, WHICH IS RARE IN LIFE! HOUSE ARREST SIX MONTHS.
|
|
by Jeffrey
|
01/24/08 09:55 AM
|
|
We should focus on Treatment,not Punishment for Porcelli. He has shown great poise and courage with his handling of the charges in spite of what the writer would say.I believe his attorney that he is overcharged and now it is time for mercy for him!
|
|
by Stewart
|
01/24/08 09:39 AM
|
|
Don't think for a New York second that it's easy for Porcelli to have overcome the odds here with his cooperation and the tremendous affort on the demon in his life.He should be given a chance to redeem.A year probation and rehab is called for here!
|
|
by Bruce
|
01/23/08 03:44 PM
|
|
I do not enjoy criticsing the author of this article, but I think he has come way too far over the top.Why does he insist on making this into a personal attack?No good journalism here.I am dissapointed in the treatment.He should receive 1yr probation
|
|
by Sandy Lou
|
01/23/08 03:36 PM
|
|
when it comes time for the sentencing, I am sure the judge will impart leniency to this man. He has a remarkable effort he has put forth and i cannot imagine anyone failing to see the value, this reporter notwithstanding. He has drubbed the defendant
|
|
by Celeste
|
01/23/08 03:32 PM
|
|
I feel for this man and his family. He should certainly get the favorable treatment he has earned with his accomplishments his lawyer has eloquently portrayed for us all to read. I hope Mr. Porcelli gets no more than a couple of year's probation.
|
|
by Paul
|
01/23/08 03:28 PM
|
|
This is the worst smear of a good man i have ever seen by the media.What were you guys thinking? He cooperates with the govt and beats a demon, and you want to make fun. I hope he gets treated right by the Judge, which clearly would be work release.
|
|
by Benny
|
01/22/08 04:48 PM
|
|
The amount of effort that this man has put in to better his situation is remarkable and therefore we should look closely at the merits of his having probation and maybe some repayment of a portion of the alleged losses.But frankly,this is trumped up!
|
|
by Spencer
|
01/22/08 10:40 AM
|
|
In the final analysis we have a man that stands to do much good for the community if we help him beyond the hurdles he faces. That is why he should not get jail and needs to be involved going forward in good things. Maybe probation for a year for him
|
|
by Tara
|
01/22/08 10:36 AM
|
|
I do not like to see the newspaper reporter mock this man especially since he has made an honest attempt to do the right thing. Does this reporter feel compelled to ridicule him? I think he should avoid jail and get rehab help and then probation.
|
|
by Wally P
|
01/22/08 10:34 AM
|
|
There is a lot of name calling and that is not what we should look at.We should look at the offense and the sentence, period. I believe the amount involved, even though it might anger some at $200 a piece,dictates Halfway House or some supervision.
|
|
by BRUCE
|
01/22/08 10:33 AM
|
|
PU THIS ON A SLIDING SCALE, THE MORE THINGS HE DOES RIGHT, THE MORE BREAKS HE GETS. BUT IN ANY CASE NO JAIL!
|
|
by Cheryl
|
01/22/08 10:31 AM
|
|
Porcelli has stepped up and taken responsibility. I do not know him, but I respect the fact he has put his faith in the justice system.Now it is up to the system to treat him fairly. He should have house arrest and then some reasonable fine to repay
|
|
by Bart
|
01/18/08 12:08 AM
|
|
I have to agree that locking up a man who cooperates and also beats an addiction has to rate pretty high on my scale of respect. I would recommend house Arrest followed by counseling for this man. I hope many of you agree
|