News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Democrats respond to Florida suit
By WES ALLISON, Times Staff Writer
Published October 31, 2007
WASHINGTON - Florida Democrats are to blame for sidelining themselves in the race to choose a presidential nominee, and the Democratic National Committee has wide latitude to set primary rules as it sees fit.
That's the DNC's legal response, filed Tuesday in federal court in Tallahassee, to a lawsuit from Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., and Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Miramar, filed over Florida's lost delegates to the 2008 primaries. The suit contends the national party's decision to strip Florida of its 210 delegates to the nominating convention unfairly disenfranchises Democratic voters, particularly minorities.
The DNC yanked Florida's delegates this summer after the Republican-led state Legislature moved the state's primary to Jan. 29, a week earlier than allowed under party rules. Without having delegates to distribute to winning candidates, Florida's Democratic primary election officially means nothing.
Nelson and Hastings sued on grounds that rendering the primary moot violates the Voting Rights Act and other laws. In its response, the DNC notes that the courts have given the national political parties wide latitude to set their rules for choosing candidates, even when taxpayers pay for the primaries.
The DNC also noted that it tried to help Florida Democrats comply with the primary rules by organizing an alternative to the Jan. 29 primary, either a vote-by-mail campaign or a statewide caucus. But state party officials said those options were too expensive, even if the DNC chipped in.
Nelson and Hastings expect to file a motion by week's end seeking a quick hearing. Meanwhile, the Republican National Committee's executive committee has recommended that Florida Republicans lose half of their delegates to the GOP convention for moving the primary up.
[Last modified October 30, 2007, 23:36:00]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Edna
|
11/01/07 02:14 PM
|
|
Man. Dean & the DNC just do NOT get it, do they? Not only do I want our 210 delegates restored, I want Howard Dean, Donna Brazile, & any other DNC officials involved in the decision to disenfranchise FL & MI to be removed from my party's leadership!
|
|
by Ron
|
10/31/07 02:38 PM
|
|
The DNC decided that my vote would not be counted, but didn't have any problem asking for money support. The absent candidates also have no problem asking for money. I said NO to the DNC! Perhaps if more followed suit, the DNC would change it's mind?
|
|
by John
|
10/31/07 12:33 PM
|
|
Unfortunately, the FL dems are used to ignoring the laws of our country, so even following the rules of their own party is difficult.
The FL dems initiated the change and now they must live with the consequences.
|
|
by Kevin
|
10/31/07 10:05 AM
|
|
Barnaby - The primary chooses the DNCs candidate, it's their constest, their rules. Voters get to choose from the party picks in November. The problem is really closed primary systems in general.
|
|
by Barnaby
|
10/31/07 09:16 AM
|
|
I would like to know how the DNC got all their power to make decisions for this country. As an AMerican I should be able to vote and my vote should count. Period. The end.
|