News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Congress should outlaw waterboarding at once
By A TIMES EDITORIAL
Published November 6, 2007
The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected today to send the nomination of Michael Mukasey to be attorney general to the Senate floor for a confirmation vote. The nomination appeared imperiled until two Democratic senators, Dianne Feinstein of California and Charles Schumer of New York, broke ranks with their party colleagues on the committee and announced their support for Mukasey despite his refusal to declare "waterboarding" illegal.
The expected confirmation of Mukasey should not be the end of the debate on torture. In salvaging Mukasey's nomination, Feinstein and Schumer urged Congress to stand up to President Bush and approve legislation that once and for all would outlaw waterboarding, or simulated drowning, and other interrogation methods regarded as torture.
In his testimony before the committee, Mukasey called waterboarding "repugnant" but declined to say it was illegal before he has a chance to review Justice Department memos that may have provided legal cover for CIA interrogators who used the technique on suspected al-Qaida leaders after the 9/11 attacks.
Waterboarding is torture, and the United States has prosecuted its enemies for war crimes for using it on American soldiers. Under every conceivable definition but the mangled one put forth by the Bush administration, waterboarding is an illegal practice under the Geneva Conventions and U.S. law.
Mukasey refused to say as much because such an admission could put CIA interrogators and administration officials in legal jeopardy. Already, former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeldhad a criminal complaint on torture filed against him by human rights groups last month while he was traveling in France.
Meanwhile, lawmakers need to do more than just denounce torture; they should act to end it once and for all. They should pass legislation sponsored by Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., that would unequivocally outlaw waterboarding and other practices most people would recognize as torture. Biden's proposal would limit interrogation techniques to those authorized by the U. S. Army Field Manual on Intelligence Interrogation. The manual specifically forbids waterboarding.
If members of Congress hated torture as much as their rhetoric suggests, this law would already be on the books.
[Last modified November 5, 2007, 21:20:25]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Doc
|
11/07/07 12:57 AM
|
|
I have been waterboarded during training...if can we do it to our own troops, then it's not torture.
|
|
by Denise
|
11/06/07 05:44 PM
|
|
We signed the Geneva convention in order to prevent torture by EVERYONE. If we do it, that tells our enemies its OK to do to our soldiers. I do not want to place our soldiers in line for torture by condoning it when done to anyone. Torture is wrong.
|
|
by Cid
|
11/06/07 05:11 PM
|
|
I say right on...when THEY STOP chopping off the heads of our soldiers, we will cease waterboarding. I don't see these "Bush bashers" condeming the enemies' methods.
|
|
by Mack
|
11/06/07 03:52 PM
|
|
Who rights are we protecting. Enemy combatants or american soldiers being killed daily by IEDs
|
|
by Becky
|
11/06/07 12:44 PM
|
|
ANyone who believes "waterboarding" is not a form of torture, should submit to this treatment themselves. THen we'll see who thinks it's torture and who doesn't. I for one believe it is torture! Outlaw it!
|
|
by americanwhocares
|
11/06/07 12:33 PM
|
|
How sad, this is what America has sunk to under the Bush Junta. Why do we have to pass a law to outlaw what the world has defined as torture for many years? How sick are the people now running OUR country.
|
|
by geezer
|
11/06/07 09:15 AM
|
|
Won't do much good if Bush vetoes it but congress should pass it never the less and at least make a statement to us and the world that we still have principles. Bush 'the decider' is an immoral man who shames this country and it's constitution.
|
|
by Mark
|
11/06/07 07:39 AM
|
|
Congress should support the men responsible for preventing attacks by removing the threat their own government will punishment them. If it works, and it does, use it!!
|