Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
'Outsiders' triumph in St. Petersburg council elections
Record low turnout elects two critics of the mayor and two incumbents.
By AARON SHAROCKMAN and NICOLE HUTCHESON, Times Staff Writers
Published November 7, 2007
|
District 3: Bill Dudley celebrates with his wife, Michelle, as he sees his early vote deficit slowly begin to turn into victory. Voter turnout was a record low.
|
 |
|
[Willie J. Allen, Jr. | Times]
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Edmund D. Fountain | Times]
District 7: City Council member-elect Wengay Newton weeps while hugging his daughter, Chelsea, 9, after he won the race against Gershom Faulkner.
|
 |
Jaime Bennett retained his seat in District 5. Voters could choose between him and "New Election."
|
 |
Herb Polson, who was appointed to the seat in District 1 in 2006, retained his seat.
|
|
ST. PETERSBURG -- Wengay Newton and Bill Dudley, two self-described outsiders who campaigned against City Hall, narrowly won seats Tuesday on the City Council. In an election with record low 9 percent turnout, Newton defeated Gershom Faulkner by some 600 votes in District 7; Dudley beat Ed Montanari by less than 260 votes in District 3. Newton and Dudley had been voiceful critics of Mayor Rick Baker's fiscal policies. Both men said the message resonated. "We'll work with the mayor. But he has to work with us," Newton said after fielding congratulatory calls from several council members. "The people really want change. They want something done." "Being a coach, you're always up for a challenge," said Dudley, the former wrestling coach at Northeast High School. "We had to overcome a lot, including City Hall backing my opponent." Baker, when reached late Tuesday, said he believed the close victories of Newton and Dudley do not suggest a mandate for change. "They were individual races," Baker said. "But however it turns out, I will do what we always do -- work with each of the council members to find common ground," Baker said. Only about 14,500 of the city's 156,146 registered voters cast ballots in the city election, a 9 percent turnout. The previous record was 11 percent, which was set in 1995 and equaled in the September council primary. Two other seats on council were also decided Tuesday, with incumbents Jamie Bennett and Herb Polson winning re-election. Polson, who was appointed to the seat in District 1 in 2006, defeated former City Council member Bob Kersteen by about 600 votes. When asked by a reporter how he was doing after the results were final, Polson simply turned to a crowd of supporters and asked: "How am I doing?" The group all cheered. "I just plain worked hard every single day for the last six months," Polson said. "I never deviated from the message, and I was fortunate that the voters agreed with it." Bennett had the easiest night among the candidates. Without an official opponent, the current council chairman overwhelmingly retained his seat in District 5. Voters could choose between him and "New Election." "I'm thrilled," said Bennett, who partied with supporters at The Chattaway on Fourth Street South. "I'm still waiting for 'New Election' to call me to concede." For much of the night, Montanari was leading in the District 3 race. But the lead started to shrink by 9 p.m. "I'm a little more nervous than I was earlier," Montanari said after the 9:30 p.m. results came in, showing a tightening race. His mother, Barbara Montanari, gave him a reassuring kiss before leaving the campaign party at a building on Central Avenue. "Moms are never wrong," she said. "He's a shoo-in." Throngs of Dudley supporters watched the results trickle in nearby at Ferg's Sports Bar and Grill. "There's a mood with voters today of 'let's change government,'" said Richard Jager, a local union steward and Dudley supporter. The race wasn't decided until 11:45 p.m., when the last votes were finally counted. "This was ridiculous," Dudley said. "We live in the 21st century. We can put a guy on the moon and bring him back faster than we can count the ballots. But we did it and that's all that counts." Elected council members serve four years and receive $39,330 a year. They take office in January. Aaron Sharockman can be reached at asharockman@sptimes.com or (727) 892-2273.
[Last modified November 7, 2007, 01:13:26]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Denise
|
11/08/07 04:09 AM
|
|
I second the complaints on lack of coverage-it was hard to find out the candidates positions on issues.I agree that we need to take our city back from developers-we should all be involved instead of waiting for city council to do something.
|
|
by Christopher
|
11/07/07 10:26 PM
|
|
The turnout in 2005 was 20%. In that race, there were four Council races and a Mayor's race which included TV ads.
The turnout for 2007 was 10%. There were only three races, no Mayor's race, and no TV ads. This accounts for the reduced turnout.
|
|
by Jack Killingsworth
|
11/07/07 10:13 PM
|
|
As an engineer with years of experience developing and using mission critical systems including putting men on the moon. and as a Democratic candidate for Supervisor of Elections, taking until 11:45 PM to finish counting the vote should be ridiculed.
|
|
by Citi-zen
|
11/07/07 06:06 PM
|
|
Gee. I wonder what the next election will bring? Who will be courting the firefighters then? It looks like the citizens trust their judgment, and not that of the goober smootchers of the inner cicle. Anybody seen Kathleen Ford?
|
|
by michael
|
11/07/07 12:40 PM
|
|
When? Where? How? Were we supposed to vote? We have lived in this area and been registered voters for years, yet never received any notification of when or where to VOTE.
|
|
by Tyrone
|
11/07/07 11:31 AM
|
|
Congratulations to Wengay Newton. A personal friend since grade school. You've always stand by your convictions and persevered. I know you'll serve your district well.
|
|
by Truth
|
11/07/07 10:47 AM
|
|
Yes, it is a GREAT DAY in St. Pete. Both the Times and their educational environmental Uhuru supporting Mayor Rick Baker got slapped up by fed-up voters. There may yet be a chance to save a dying crime-ridden drug-filled city.
|
|
by Mike
|
11/07/07 09:55 AM
|
|
As a new comer to FL and St Pete I have to agree with the statement from Always vote who complained about the lack of media coverage. I sent several thoughts on this very topic that were not published.
|
|
by Allen Sledge
|
11/07/07 09:53 AM
|
|
It is not surprising that the turnout was so low. Many people did not understand that it was a city wide election open to all registered voters. At no time did I see any campaign literature or news article that stated everyone could vote.
|
|
by jes
|
11/07/07 09:48 AM
|
|
it's a GREAT DAY in St. Petersburg!
|
|
by Shawanda
|
11/07/07 09:22 AM
|
|
Coach Dudley Congrats! We're counting on you to keep it real and holding it down. I voted for the first time and it really counted!
|
|
by Matt
|
11/07/07 09:12 AM
|
|
Congratulations Coach Dudley; he's lead many young men over the years as a Coach. Now he can have a positive influence on the city as a Councilman. Mayor Dudley next? That sounds GOOD!!!
|
|
by Disenfranchised
|
11/07/07 08:56 AM
|
|
Perhaps it's Baker getting an earful from his neighbors in the Old Northeast. If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention! It's a GREAT day in St. Petersburg, because it's a NEW day - time to take back our city. Both wife and I DID vote!
|
|
by Disenfranchised
|
11/07/07 08:51 AM
|
|
Maybe, just maybe, more people would vote if they believed the pols would represent the people instead of the developers who fund their campaigns. St. Pete City Council certainly doesn't listen to the people they were elected to represent. (more)
|
|
by Kathy
|
11/07/07 08:36 AM
|
|
Congradulations coach Dudley. I'm very happy for you and so are the rest of the Crowleys!
|
|
by Kay
|
11/07/07 08:30 AM
|
|
Anyone who did vote should be very proud. The races were very close so it is great to feel as though my vote actually did count.
|
|
by Larry
|
11/07/07 08:30 AM
|
|
I've got news for Mayor Baker, when the candidates who were backed by his administration, the local newspaper, and the encumbants, lose the election, that's a mandate for change. Yes, the margin was small, but so was the turnout.
|
|
by Thomas
|
11/07/07 08:28 AM
|
|
It's unfortunate Bennett was reelected. There isn't anything conservative about him. The man believes government's role is that of a provider. His stance on the homeless is sickening.
|
|
by Bill
|
11/07/07 07:49 AM
|
|
Congrats to all but especially democrats Bennett and Newton who bring conservative compassion for the true issues we face here.
|
|
by Samm
|
11/07/07 07:36 AM
|
|
A Victory for the People! Congratulations Newt!
|
|
by Always vote
|
11/07/07 07:30 AM
|
|
It doesn't surprise me that only 9 percent voted, it doesn't seem that the election got much coverage in the media. It really surprises me that anyone voted at all due to the lack of coverage of the election.
|
|
by Marty S.
|
11/07/07 07:03 AM
|
|
Both Newt & Dudley were voted in due to a strong plank on Public Safety. The citizens want their city taken back from the drug dealing, murdering thugs. Perform!
|
|
by Voted
|
11/07/07 06:56 AM
|
|
Not a mandate for change? Mayor Baker needs to wake up. Those of us who live in the city are fed up with open drug use, dealing, and drinking from open containers. We're sick of worrying about our homes when we go out. Crime here is embarassing.
|
|