St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Did voters send message?

Victories by two City Council outsiders raise that possibility and a few other theories.

By AARON SHAROCKMAN, Times Staff Writer
Published November 8, 2007


Bill Dudley and Wengay Newton celebrate together at Ferg's as old friends and newly elected City Council members Tuesday.
photo
[Willie J. Allen, Jr. | Times]
ADVERTISEMENT

ST. PETERSBURG - A day after two political outsiders landed seats on the City Council, political operatives, city leaders and the candidates themselves turned to a time-honored election tradition - speculating what the voters were trying to say.

Are residents fed up with their government?

Is Mayor Rick Baker's political capital waning?

Is it all just a cosmic coincidence?

It's hard to draw any solid conclusions from a series of City Council elections where 14,500 votes were cast out of a possible 156,146 - a record low turnout of 9 percent.

But that didn't stop people on Wednesday from trying.

- - -

To some, the improbable victories of Bill Dudley and Wengay Newton over a pair of establishment candidates could signal a warning for the status quo in City Hall.

But it also could be that Dudley and Newton plain worked harder.

Dudley, 63, offered both possibilities the morning after his 1-percentage-point victory over Ed Montanari.

"It shows people are willing to take a chance for change," said Dudley, who ran unsuccessfully for the council in 2003. "I really think that was the message. I'm independent. I'm not beholden to anyone, and I think people like that."

Dudley said the hiring of a political consultant, Neil Brickfield, also helped propel his campaign in the final days.

At Brickfield's urging, Dudley targeted specific neighborhood's in the campaigns last 72 hours, did four robo-calls and sent out a last-minute mail piece.

In the end, Dudley took a 356-vote disadvantage from the primary election and turned it into a 257-vote victory.

"Mr. Dudley worked very hard to deliver a message that he would be an independent voice," Brickfield said. "And that message seemed to resonate."

Newton, who beat Gershom Faulkner by more than 600 votes, said the message from voters was clear.

"The people want something done," said Newton, 44. "All of my energy and my allegiances are going to the citizens. Those are the people that made this possible when I was up against the so-called 'machine'. "

Firefighters, others claim victory, too

There was plenty of other fist-pumping Wednesday.

At some point during the day, the St. Petersburg firefighters union, a politically active gay rights group and the local Democratic Party all declared victory.

Even Baker, who some considered a loser on Election Night he endorsed Montanari and Faulkner, seemed unfazed by the results.

Baker's most forceful critic, Bob Kersteen, lost his bid for office against Herb Polson.

"We'll be able to move forward," Baker said. "You have new folks. But that's okay, they come with a new perspective. My approach had always been to try to look for common ground."

The firefighters' candidates won in all four council elections. Their union president is Newton's brother.

And the two candidates who said they would not attend the St. Pete Pride Parade - Montanari and Faulkner - both lost.

"I couldn't be more pleased with the election results," said Rick Boylan, president of the Pinellas Stonewall Democrats, a group that promotes gay rights issues. "There are a variety of issues people vote on. But I think the fact that some people voted on the fairness and openness issues is encouraging."

Happy electorate behind low turnout?

City officials and others said Wednesday that there may be as much to learn from the 140,000 people who didn't vote as the small number that did.

Some believe those folks didn't vote because they're happy the way things are.

"The people that are less critical of the city and the mayor's record probably stayed home," said Darden Rice, who worked on both Polson and Jamie Bennett's successful re-election campaigns.

"With a low turnout election, surprises happen," she said.

Rice, who ran for council in 2005, said the more appropriate barometer may be the work of the individual campaigns.

In the three contested races, the person who put in more time prevailed, Rice said.

"The people with the most spirited campaigns, the ones working the hardest, they are the ones who won," Rice said. "Wengay was trying to fight hard to come from behind, so was Dudley. And Herb (Polson) didn't take anything for granted."

It could be that simple, or it could be something more. Either way, the new council has four years to figure it out.

Aaron Sharockman can be reached asharockman@sptimes.com or (727) 892-2273.

[Last modified November 8, 2007, 01:32:53]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by John 11/09/07 03:31 PM
This was a message that the citizens are sick of the drunken spending by local government. They want change. They want property taxes reduced. Watch out, Pinellas commissioners are next.
by Clifford 11/08/07 06:37 PM
Joe: I don't live in the Old NE-that is District 4. Pete: Council approves the Mayor's budget and sets policy. It's a part time job paying less than $40k. You can't call the police or codes to report front yard parking, etc.? Continued....
by Deborah Edney 11/08/07 03:11 PM
CONGRATULATIONS, LET THIS ELECTION REPRESENT, A RIPPLE IN THE POND OF POLITICS, THAT WITH EACH ELECTION,THE POWER OF OUR VOTE, WILL CREATE A TITLE WAVE, THAT WILL WASH AWAY THE GREED AND CORRUPTION,IN OUR GOVERNMENT, THAT IS DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY!
by Joe 11/08/07 12:43 PM
Clifford: Lemme guess-you live in OLD NE, you're neighbors with Baker, and happy the Westin deal was denied, so you think all our pols are out there representing us, the people. Wake up! My wife and I voted for all 3 winners, except for new election.
by Joe 11/08/07 12:37 PM
Ed: BS Alarm just went off. Herb was the only one challenging Baker to find creative solutions during the budget hearings. You can thank him for getting the library to stay open. He thinks outside the box and was also the lone vote against Sembler.
by Chris 11/08/07 12:15 PM
The establishment(folks in power) want a low turnout b/c it keeps them in power. There were no TV debates, no newspaper suppliments on the candidates,and no Notice of Election from the Supervisor of Elections. This time it backfired on them.Thank God
by Joe 11/08/07 12:07 PM
Since this is the worst the Times and Baker have ever done with their endorsements, how could it be called anything but a desire for change?
by Pete 11/08/07 10:49 AM
I didn't vote cause who really cares? We have a councilmen in this neighborhood and he sees nothing when his neighbors parks their cars in the front yard or right of way. He looks the other way instead of doing something. He cares only for the pay
by Just My 2 Cents 11/08/07 10:22 AM
Anyone who believes that a low voter turnout is due to people being happy with the way things are is delusional! Disenfranchised is right, people just don't have faith anymore in their elected representatives.
by Clifford 11/08/07 09:40 AM
Not voting because they don't believe their elected officials represent them is an excuse and not a valid reason. Again, check the treasurer's reports to see have contributed and then voice your opinion. Post them online too for everyone to see!
by Resident 11/08/07 09:36 AM
It's about time the citizens get their city back. Dudley and Newton are REAL people. It's not about "status" with these two! I encourage everyone who has not had the opportunity to talk to these men,do so. They will listen & let your voice be heard!
by Bland 11/08/07 09:28 AM
Given the recent increase in spending that the Times has been reporting the last year, how can the people not be upset with the present local government? Of course people want change. They want leaders who will manage this uncontrolled spending.
by ED 11/08/07 08:55 AM
I'M FED UP, THAT'S FOR SURE! SORRY BOB (KERSTEEN), I VOTED FOR U CUZ HERB'S IN RICK'S BACK POCKET.
by Michael 11/08/07 06:48 AM
I couldn't agree more. This is proven day in and day out. By the miracle of a chance a GOOD man/woman wants to run, it is to be assured that special interest money would be pumped to his/her rival.
by E.C. 11/08/07 06:34 AM
My votes for Newton and Dudley were definitely a message. It's embarassing that St Pete still acts segregated and that I can't leave my house at night and the fixtures in Midtown are litter, drug dealing, and drinking on the curb.
by Disenfranchised 11/08/07 06:10 AM
Many people don't vote because they no longer believe their elected politicians represent the people who elected them. Instead, our politicians represent the growth industry (developers, lawyers, builders) who fund their campaigns.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT