News |
Rays
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
New Rays dawning?
Principal owner Stuart Sternberg unveils what he hopes is an organizational image makeover with a new name and uniform.
By MARC TOPKIN, Times Staff Writer
Published November 9, 2007
|
Tampa Bay Rays outfielder Jonny Gomes rips off a shirt to reveal his restyled uniform during a fashion show Thursday evening to introduce the team's new uniforms at Straub Park in St. Petersburg. The team also showed off its new logos, blue-themed colors and shortened name, with the word "Devil" being dropped.
|
 |
|
[Edmund D. Fountain | Times]
|
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Edmund D. Fountain | Times]
Champs employees, left to right, Christian Piccon, Terence Ware and Katy Martin try on the new jerseys at Straub Park.
|
 |
|
[Edmund D. Fountain | Times]
Outfielder Delmon Young strolls before the fans in his new, more blue threads.
|
|
ST. PETERSBURG - They strutted on the catwalk, modeling their new blue uniforms and shortened name, then talking optimistically about what they hope are better days in Tampa Bay.
But as much as Thursday's introduction of the new Rays - the Tampa Bay (no Devil) Rays - was about the future, it was also about their horrid past.
"I think it gives us as an organization an identity," principal owner Stuart Sternberg said. "It was something where we were tied to the past and the past wasn't necessarily something we wanted to be known for. Nobody is running from it, nobody is hiding from it, and we are proud of certain aspects, but this is something the organization is really able to put their arms around. And I hope and expect the fans that come out will see it as a new beginning."
The new uniforms aren't going to make the Rays play any better, and there may be some question if they look any better, but they apparently are going to feel a lot better about themselves.
"Uniforms are uniforms, but I think this is more of a symbolic change for the team where the identity of the team is changing from the team that it was to a team that is going to be a force," said injured outfielder Rocco Baldelli, batting leadoff again as the first player introduced to the enthusiastic Straub Park crowd estimated at 7,000.
"The new regime has come in and a lot of positive things are happening. The uniform changes will go right along with it. People will identify with the new Rays as opposed to the old."
Tradition, tradition
Sternberg had a vision. And one year, hundreds of conversations with MLB design officials, dozens of revisions and a few "nasty stories" later, it came out "absolutely spot on" to what he expected.
Sternberg wanted blue (even though more than half the teams wear it). He wanted a "classic, crisp look." He wanted to incorporate the sun. He wanted something that "had to say baseball." He wanted timeless and traditional.
Taking a "once in a lifetime" chance to "rebrand" a franchise in its same market with a variation of its same name, Anne Occi, MLB vice president of design services, said they got it by combining the traditional design Sternberg sought with a color scheme indicative of Florida.
The dark blue represents the water, the light blue the sky and the yellow burst the sun, though that turned out to be the most complicated part as they kept trying for the right effect and settled on what Occi said was technically "a glint." The rolling extension of the R is to reflect motion - "a subtle undulation" - of the water.
"It's a traditional baseball uniform that's unique," Occi said.
What's in a name?
Sternberg knew what the team wouldn't be called - "The Devil was going; I didn't like it."
That left them with the Rays.
And after 1,000 suggestions, after 80 serious possibilities, after considering Cannons, Stars, Wave, Dukes (seriously!), Sun Rays, and even Tampa Bay Baseball, they ended up where they started, though in more generic form (sun, cownose that swim in the outfield tank, old-logo devil in a patch on their sleeve).
"It was pretty clear this was the one," he said.
They also decided to drop TAMPA BAY from their road uniforms (though the hats still have a TB logo) in what Sternberg insisted was an effort to build their new brand and had nothing to do with disassociating from - or leaving - the area. Five other teams similarly have their nicknames on their road jerseys.
"The brand is the Rays and to really get people to focus on it, when we're on the road and they're watching the games (on TV) they're going to see the burst and we're going to get that across," he said.
And for the conspiracy theorists?
"I don't think I can be any clearer about our desires and hopes to make this work here and we expect it to work here," he said. "Tampa Bay is our home and there's no reason to read into it other than really trying to get people focused and comfortable with the Rays brand."
It's a new day in Tampa Bay
New uniforms can lead to a new image for a franchise. Just ask the Bucs, who had 14 straight losing seasons before, under new ownership, they dumped Bucco Bruce and their creamsicle orange uniforms for pewter power in 1997.
They won their first five games in red, made the playoffs that season and, after also moving into a new stadium, four of the next five, capped by a franchise-redefining Super Bowl win.
"The words I'd use are 'fresh start,'" former Bucs GM Rich McKay said. "It was an opportunity not to forget the past, but to put the bad experiences in the past and start anew.
"We had built up a lot of equity in that brand, and the equity was losing equity. We needed to make a change. There was talk of evolving the logo. We decided to have a revolution and not an evolution."
It's a new Ray in Tampa Bay
With the new uniforms coming after new ownership, new management, a new look to Tropicana Field and a new corporate attitude, the Rays are rather giddy.
After promising, "the team is going to get better," Sternberg actually said, given their overall organizational depth, "I don't think I would trade our pitching staff, top to bottom on our roster, for almost any other in all of major-league baseball at this point."
The players are optimistic, though perhaps more realistic, about a new beginning. "We don't look the same so we're taking it like it's a fresh start for everyone," pitcher Scott Kazmir said.
"All we have to do now," rightfielder Delmon Young said, "is put up the wins."
For the most part, they liked the new look, too. And DH Jonny Gomes had the perfect accessory in mind: "Maybe, a World Series ring to cap them off."
[Last modified November 9, 2007, 00:42:53]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Greg
|
11/15/07 05:51 PM
|
|
Maybe they should have changed the name to the "Debby Downers" to represent most of you bozos. I dig 'em.
|
|
by Paul
|
11/14/07 03:03 PM
|
|
The name means nothing. They could be called the Tampa Bay Pansies and they would still command respect if they won 100 games. They could be the Tampa Bay Terminators and would still be a laughing stock if they lost 100 games. Spend $$ on TALENT !!
|
|
by jj
|
11/13/07 04:59 PM
|
|
uniforms- alright but name is terrible hopefully they can do something with it though
|
|
by Lee
|
11/12/07 12:01 PM
|
|
The new uniforms are okay. The most important thing is remaking the franchise--and this is a step in that direction. The stadium will come or not depending on whether team team wins or not---payroll $$
|
|
by Ty
|
11/11/07 04:26 PM
|
|
I am a Baltimore Orioles fan so I really don't care, but I think the new uniforms are way better.
|
|
by Josh
|
11/11/07 01:01 AM
|
|
I haven't been to a game in ages. Though, I am a fan. The new uniform suck, bad! I liked the old green uniforms way better. And "Rays" sounds stupid. D-Rays is catchy. Green is catchy. That little "glint" is as bad as the old rainbow colors.
|
|
by Lee
|
11/10/07 12:52 PM
|
|
I certainly would not use the word gay to describe the new boring uniforms. There is surely nothing unique about themm. I have seen little league uniforms with more character.
|
|
by Willie
|
11/10/07 11:07 AM
|
|
The worst uni in baseball you say? Well, it's appropriate that it goes to the worst team.
|
|
by Wyatt
|
11/09/07 09:17 PM
|
|
Dark Blue is the ocean...Light blue is the Sky and the north star on the letter "R" is the sun?! What was wrong with the green we had?...Oh I know it was the color of money and the owners are short on that! This uniform goes on the "NO SALE" List!
|
|
by Joe John
|
11/09/07 09:14 PM
|
|
Posada would be a great signing. But would he come here?
|
|
by Mark
|
11/09/07 07:56 PM
|
|
New uniforms, new logo,new prices, paid parking What's next? How about a new set of fans because we are all getting sick and tired of all the new things that won't make the team any better. How about spending some money on new players that can play.
|
|
by Bill
|
11/09/07 06:55 PM
|
|
The uniforms " SUCK " thanxs again stu for the letdown.
|
|
by Chris
|
11/09/07 04:15 PM
|
|
I bet the new uni's will look good with LEGITIMATE major league talent in them. PLEASE give the lockeroom and pitching staff a boost and spend the $ to sign Jorge Posada. Same as the Tigers signing Pudge a few years ago.
|
|
by Joe
|
11/09/07 03:49 PM
|
|
I have to say the new uniforms look absolutely "gay." Adding a Starburst to the logo?! "Devil Rays" actually sounds cool and the "fish" ray logo is much more appealing. A "bush league" move by the Rays. They're trying to be the Yankees, but failing!
|
|
by Rene
|
11/09/07 02:24 PM
|
|
Hideous. I HATE the blue and the 'glint' and the long tail on the R. The design looks amateurish.
|
|
by Buczfan
|
11/09/07 02:09 PM
|
|
I'm so sick of hearing, "the Devil, had to go, I don't like it"--it's a species of sea life, geez--talk about nauseating political correctness, you can't do anything without cowing to someone, I don't like rich NYer's buying a team and doing nothing
|
|
by Stosh
|
11/09/07 01:42 PM
|
|
Fine, change the name, uniforms, whatever. Just give us a few seasons of winning baseball and get the team out of that mausoleum/truck pull venue and into a ballpark. I'll miss the big fish tank though.
|
|
by Luu
|
11/09/07 01:33 PM
|
|
Hey Stu, you need to concentrate on changing and adding players(pitchers) and not on changing names and logos. The guys can be out there in Bell-Bottoms but they will still stink. Come on man, going on 11 seasons now.
|
|
by Rebecca
|
11/09/07 01:26 PM
|
|
Boring and generic! They kind of look like Yankees jerseys. Changing the name and uniforms will not make them a better team if they don't pay their quality players. It's the same in every sport. That's why I haven't been to a D-Ray game in 7 years.
|
|
by HJ
|
11/09/07 12:36 PM
|
|
I liked the old uniforms better. The were more original. RAYS is fine but the new logo sucks.
|
|
by Drew
|
11/09/07 11:24 AM
|
|
Well, the "Rays" have lost another fan here. The name sounds stupid - Tampa Bay Rays - it rhymes! The uni's are butt-ugly to boot. Way to go, Sternberg & Co. You blew it.
|
|
by Dan
|
11/09/07 11:23 AM
|
|
Is that Times New Roman?
|
|
by Odddi
|
11/09/07 10:39 AM
|
|
I like the uniforms and I think the new RAYS can acompplish a lot in this new era of changes. They still in need for improving specially in the bullpen and a couple of power hitter. GO RAYS
|
|
by TJ
|
11/09/07 10:33 AM
|
|
The 2001 D-backs won the World Series in the old uniforms. Now we look like the Royals and Blue Jays. I'm all for a fresh start but the old uniforms were nice. I liked the green and the Ray. Lets focus on better pitching and WINS instead of unis!
|
|
by Jonathan
|
11/09/07 10:25 AM
|
|
These new uniforms are terrible! Why focus on rays of sunshine vs. an actual stingray, which at least seemed somewhat threatening. Is a ray of sunshine actually supposed to strike fear into the opponent? Now they will be made fun of even more!
|
|
by sam
|
11/09/07 10:16 AM
|
|
I'm excited about the future of this team, BUT I the uniforms are weak. Where's the GREEN? What is "unique" about these uniforms? Nothing. Blah. Boring. Same old stuff. Hopefully that will not carry over to the team. Still supporting though!
|
|
by Paul
|
11/09/07 09:44 AM
|
|
I'm still trying to figure out this whole 'Tampabay' thing. Isn't the team in St Pete? Isn't the field on 16th and 1st Ave S in St Pete? Guess our town is good enough for them to play in but not good enough to be named for. They ashamed of St Pete?
|
|
by Jeff
|
11/09/07 09:42 AM
|
|
The Blue looks good. The Trop won't look so empty on TV now either, as the new digs match the color of the seats. The green and gray clashed with the empty seats. Now let's go spend some money on a catcher, short-stop and a bullpen.
|
|
by Fred
|
11/09/07 08:52 AM
|
|
It's not the suit that makes the man, it's the man that makes the suit.
|
|
by Bob
|
11/09/07 08:46 AM
|
|
What was wrong with "Devil"? Good thing Sternberg isn't the owner of the New Jersey Devils.
|
|
by Matt
|
11/09/07 08:42 AM
|
|
So are we rays in the water or the sunrays? Or are we both?
|
|
by jp
|
11/09/07 07:52 AM
|
|
inoffensive at best. Goodbye TB. The Rays new logo will work anywhere the sun shines, for example, Las Vegas.All part of the 5 year plan.Once again the DRays have a chance to make a splash and fizzle instead.
|
|
by Charlie
|
11/09/07 07:24 AM
|
|
The NEW uniforms are great. I was one who had a problem with the idea & with the pre-sketches but loved the unavailing. It was a great night for the Rays. In life you can buck the system over small things or join in and support. I chose to support
|
|
by John
|
11/09/07 07:19 AM
|
|
If you want traditional, the organization needs to require that players wear their pants how they are supposed to be worn, not down to the ankles and have them wear stirups too.
and Dukes?... we'd need black and white stipes with that name.
|
|
by kevin
|
11/09/07 07:19 AM
|
|
are they like the .. the rays of the sun now..cant really touch tank that w/out a few extra crispy kids
|