News |
Rays
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Taxes play in Rays' plans
City and county taxes look like a vital turn in the financial map to a new stadium.
By AARON SHAROCKMAN, Times Staff Writer
Published November 21, 2007
ST. PETERSBURG - The Tampa Bay Rays are counting on more than the sale of Tropicana Field to help pay for a new waterfront stadium.
The team is studying a plan to use city and county property tax dollars from the redevelopment of Tropicana Field to raise money for a new $450-million ballpark, according to documents released by the city this week.
Those tax dollars could raise nearly $150-million by 2035, based on the Rays' projections.
Thanks to a city tax program in place since 1982, the local tax revenue generated by such a development must be used on capital improvements downtown anyway. But questions remain. Would the city and county agree to it? Could the Rays get the money in a lump sum up front?
City officials declined to discuss the idea, and the Rays have remained publicly silent on the details of their plans. The team has said it will unveil its stadium proposal next week.
Rays senior vice president for development and business affairs Michael Kalt tipped his hand in a letter to the city last month.
The new stadium, Kalt wrote, "must pay for itself through a combination of private funds and new taxes generated by the redevelopment of the Tropicana Field site."
Rays principal owner Stuart Sternberg has pledged up to $150-million toward the cost of a new stadium on the current site of Al Lang Field. The team also is interested in requesting a $60-million sales tax subsidy from the state.
That leaves the team looking for $240-million.
The Rays hope to capitalize on a city tax program in place for 25 years for at least some of the funds.
The tax increment financing program was created to pump city and county tax dollars into capital projects in the area where the taxes are paid.
The city has three tax districts - one in and around downtown, one directly to the west and one to the south.
Most of the Tropicana site fits into the downtown taxing district, as does the Al Lang site.
Under the district's rules, city and county property taxes collected on the redeveloped Tropicana site could be redirected to help pay construction costs at the new ballpark.
The money also could help fund infrastructure or road repairs, or build a parking garage. Or it could be used on sidewalks, lighting or signage.
It could not be used for most personnel costs, including police officers, or most city programs. And it cannot be spent outside the tax district.
The special district was to expire in 2012. But Mayor Rick Baker persuaded Pinellas County commissioners in 2005 to extend the program until 2035.
Baker said then the extra money would be help pay for repairs to the Pier and the Mahaffey Theater. Other funds would be used to build a parking garage and transportation hub and improve landscaping.
None of it took into account the possible redevelopment of the Tropicana site, which will bring millions more dollars to the district.
The financial impact
How much money that could be available to the Rays - if elected leaders agreed - is dependent on two things: the city and county's tax rate, and the valuation of the Tropicana land once the Rays redevelop it.
If the tax rates don't change, the Tropicana site could generate $143-million between 2012 and 2035 if the development is worth $550-million about what the Rays initially estimated, according to documents.
If the site is worth $300-million, $78.4-million would be available. If the site is worth $200-million, $52.44-million could be available.
The dollar figure would escalate if property values at the Tropicana site increase over time. The team intends to attract a developer to build a major mixed-use project at the site.
"The whole thing hinges on the successful redevelopment of that site," said Tim Baker, the president of the Downtown Neighborhood Association. "They won't get the money otherwise."
The money can't be given to the Rays, but it can be spent on projects the Rays want - if the city and the county agree.
Court creates limbo
Whether or not the team could get the bulk of the money up front is a matter now with the Florida Supreme Court.
Previously, governments were allowed to issue bonds to pay for projects in tax increment districts, with the idea that future property tax revenues would pay off the debt.
But the Florida Supreme Court ruled in September that governments need to hold a referendum to issue bonds backed by property tax dollars.
The court then last month allowed parties to argue that the case be reheard. Craig Waters, a spokesman for the court, said no decision has been made.
"The whole case is unusual," said Waters, adding that the court could uphold, reverse or modify its September ruling.
If the court upholds its decision, the Rays likely would have to ask the city for a referendum to get the proceeds up front, or take a loan out themselves.
If the court reverses its decision, the Rays could ask for the money ahead of time without a public vote. The team already is contemplating a November 2008 referendum where voters would be asked to decide whether to lease the Al Lang site to the Rays.
Rick Mussett, the city's senior development administrator, would not answer questions about tax increment financing specific to the Rays.
"There's a lot of uncertainty," he said.
And, potentially, the Rays believe, a lot of money.
Aaron Sharockman can be reached at asharockman@sptimes.com.
FAST FACTS:
Tax increment financing
- Redevelopment of Tropicana Field site could raise nearly $150-million by 2035.
- Not a new tax; money must be spent in area.
- May trigger referendum.
How St. Petersburg's tax increment financing district works:
- The city created the downtown tax increment financing district in 1982.
- It includes 309 acres downtown, including the area around BayWalk and both Tropicana Field and Al Lang Field.
- All property owners still pay their full property tax bill.
- What the city and county collect for their general funds is capped at the same amount that they received in 1982.
- The money left over is redirected to the city's tax increment fund.
- The City Council, acting as the Community Redevelopment Agency, decides how to use the extra money. The County Commission also must sign off on the plan.
- The money, $8.38-million this fiscal year, can be used for capital and infrastructure projects. It must be used within the tax increment district.
[Last modified November 21, 2007, 06:32:24]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by JD
|
11/23/07 09:35 AM
|
|
The projected tax revenues to the city from redevelopment are based on the current unfair millage rate for new owners. If the tax rate were capped at 1.35%, potential revenues would be halved. The underlying premise of windfall revenue is wrong.
|
|
by Ed
|
11/22/07 09:39 PM
|
|
Taxpayers are right to be concerned about a deal that has been kept secret from the public by city officials since March. During this period, groups interested in returning Al Lang field to public use were given the run-around by officials.
|
|
by frank
|
11/22/07 08:42 PM
|
|
i think the funding should be on a voluntary basis. if you want it, then pay for it - just like tickets. they should be able to get at least a little league field out of it. maybe a hot dog stand and a couple of parking spots too.
|
|
by Dan
|
11/22/07 05:02 PM
|
|
Wall Street guys like Steinberg don't get rich because they are stupid. He wants the City to say no and then he's off to Orlando with the team, that's where the $$$$ is.....
|
|
by mike
|
11/22/07 04:58 PM
|
|
It's time cities let these teams fund themselves and funnel the taxes where to projects that help 'everyone', like transit, giving people alternatives to get around and getting unneeded traffic off our roads.
|
|
by Al
|
11/22/07 12:46 PM
|
|
Put me down as a naysayer, and I'm not even a St. Pete taxpayer. This is a New York-style deal, shrouded in secrecy but requiring public land and taxpayer money. St. Pete is already on the map and will be after these losers move to Orlando.
|
|
by kyle
|
11/22/07 12:24 PM
|
|
If my taxes go to the stadium, do I get free parking as a stpete resident? if not, then hell no.
|
|
by Dean
|
11/22/07 10:27 AM
|
|
I think we do what ever it takes to bring in the new stadium.It's a great concept.I will give up the comforts of AC @ the trop for a Florida experience on the water.Tourists would be more inclined to come,generating more money.Thanks Stu,Matt,&Andrew
|
|
by bob
|
11/21/07 10:45 PM
|
|
Everybody want to criticize the Rays for not impoving their product. Now they are being very creative in doing so, adding millions of dollars to St. Pete, and everybody has something negative to say. if you can't afford your prop taxes, don't buy.
|
|
by Rob
|
11/21/07 08:04 PM
|
|
I love you guys. My property, my waterfront property. If it's yours, why don't you move there or try sleeping a night there. You can't, it's not yours. A prime stadium will put ST. Pete on the map. Construction provides jobs. What about that?
|
|
by Positive
|
11/21/07 02:11 PM
|
|
Let the facts shake out before going into your naysayer mode; seems pessimism runs rampant around these parts.
|
|
by Dr_Dug
|
11/21/07 12:02 PM
|
|
Why don't they sell the team and give the money to the Tax payers? Then we can invest the money and NOT have to raise taxes. Not good, then sell the city a percentage of the team so WE can make money too. There are other choices PEOPLE! NO More Taxes
|
|
by Ted
|
11/21/07 11:41 AM
|
|
The Rays are a private business. Tax dollars should not be involved period.
|
|
by Taxman
|
11/21/07 11:23 AM
|
|
Rick Mussett would not answer questions.... how suprising that a public official working for the city I live in won't answer questions. We now have 2 fine baseball fields and for some reason we should destroy both and build a new one? Lower my taxes!
|
|
by Durford
|
11/21/07 11:04 AM
|
|
Woe is me.Why do tax payers have to provide funds for losers
|
|
by Holly
|
11/21/07 10:45 AM
|
|
Sounds like the Rays have a "done deal!" We, the people, have NO say so when in comes to helping developers make their BIG money. Reprehensible, all of it!
|
|
by Bland
|
11/21/07 09:43 AM
|
|
The Rays need $260 million in tax dollars. Great ideas, provide the Rays our money and raise our taxes. Forget funds to maintain the streets, sewers, and existing structures. Play ball, NOT......
|
|
by Paul
|
11/21/07 09:15 AM
|
|
If they get the money up front, I will make sure I vote against every single city official in the next election and get them the heck out of public office. This is absurd. Lower our dang property taxes, don't borrow on future taxes.
|
|
by ja
|
11/21/07 08:55 AM
|
|
Yes, keep stealing our money to give to others. While the homeowners struggle and become homeless through foreclosure at least we will be able to enjoy watching sports in between begging for food and shelter becasue we were taxed to death! SHAME!!!!
|
|
by debbie
|
11/21/07 08:33 AM
|
|
Don't care how you look at it. Major league teams are loaded with cash. And with what they charge fans to come and watch - cut salaries and pay for your own dang stadium. Football, baseball, all of them. They don't pay for MY property!!!
|
|
by Rick
|
11/21/07 08:28 AM
|
|
These owners are very smart. Lets take in to account that they are disgarding a field in St Pete, for PRIME,PRIME WATERFRONT PROPERTY! In the next ten yrs. the value will triple.
|
|
by Jay
|
11/21/07 07:51 AM
|
|
Here it comes we need more tax dollars for a sports team. When will cities wise up that sports teams are not the cure all for a city.
|
|
by Sasha
|
11/21/07 07:47 AM
|
|
On 4/17/95 the Rays signed a contract to play at Thunderdome for 30 years. It cost $138M in 1990 and $70M in 1998 for renovation. It's only 17 today! Do we look stupid? JUST SAY NO!
|
|
by Raymond
|
11/21/07 07:11 AM
|
|
ABSOLUTELY NOT...NOT ONE PENNY OF TAX MONEY FOR THE RAYS. LET THEM CUT THE SALARIES OF THEIR UNEDUCATED PLAYERS IN HALF AND THEY WILL HAVE ALL THE FUNDS THEY NEED. LEAVE TAXPAYERS ALONE. WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH ABUSE FROM THIS STATE.
|
|
by Kim
|
11/21/07 01:43 AM
|
|
It is still taxes that the people pay in property taxes. It is like all the millions that we flooded down town and the company walked out. Here we go again at the expense of the people. (f they want a new field let the Rays pay for it.
|