News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
City loses last bid to block high-rise condominium
By Times Staff Writer
Published November 29, 2007
TAMPA - A Florida Supreme Court decision brings to an end a 3-year battle between the city of Tampa and developers who want to build a 24-story condominium tower on Bayshore Boulevard at DeSoto Street. The high court this week rejected a request from the city to consider the case. The city's Architectural Review Commission in 2004 denied the proposal by Citivest Construction Corp., saying the building was too tall for the Hyde Park Historic District. Citivest appealed the decision to the City Council, which upheld the denial. Citivest took the matter to court, saying zoning rules allowed the building. City Attorney David Smith in 2005 encouraged the council to accept a settlement from Citivest to construct a smaller building. The council voted to reject the offer and go back to court. But the city lost the case, and, in September, the 2nd District Court of Appeal upheld the decision, prompting the city to go to the Supreme Court. "This is an extremely disappointing conclusion as the courts have left Hyde Park quite vulnerable to inappropriate development," said City Council member John Dingfelder. "We have to amend our zoning code immediately to ensure that our historic districts are truly preserved and not overrun with high-rise condos."
[Last modified November 29, 2007, 02:35:23]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Bob
|
11/29/07 07:17 PM
|
|
Bayshore is within the city limits with tons of other condo buildings. Guess what? You live in the city. Not only within the city limits, but 1 mile from downtown. Get a clue or move out of the city.
|
|
by Humberto
|
11/29/07 10:53 AM
|
|
I glad to see this. I will be interested in the condos. Congratulations to the right decision made on this.
|
|
by Mike
|
11/29/07 10:40 AM
|
|
The neighborhood civic association needs to plan around-the-clock protests right in front of their sales office. You can scare off alot of potential buyers that way!! The isn't just one way to skin a SNAKE like Citivest!
|
|
by Susan
|
11/29/07 09:55 AM
|
|
What a shame! All they need to do is take a look at the beaches to see how to ruin and devistate an area.
I hope they loose their shirts.....
|
|
by Joey
|
11/29/07 09:32 AM
|
|
You gotta love it that a city can't control what gets built within their own boundaries. What is happening to this country? I also wonder how much this suit cost the city (taxpayers).
|
|
by James
|
11/29/07 08:58 AM
|
|
Boo hoo hoo. Why is everyone against free markets? If a developer wants to risk their money, that is THEIR decision. If you don't like condos, don't buy one!
|
|
by Mike
|
11/29/07 08:41 AM
|
|
It is my deepest hope that Citivest and Mr. Burrill find it in their hearts to go back up north for good. We don't need another condo, and we don't need Mr. Burrill on the Redington Pier.
|
|
by ja
|
11/29/07 08:11 AM
|
|
thats great !!! The developer can add to the growing inventory of about 41,000 unsold properties, that cannot sell in this collapsiing market. This builder needs to have his head examined for excessive stupidity. He must want to go bankrupt
|
|