Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Mayor's time limit irks commissioners
Members question the legality of Ward Friszolowski's declaration that the often laborious meetings will end promptly at 10 p.m.
By NICK JOHNSON, Times Staff Writer
Published December 2, 2007
ST. PETE BEACH - One of the city's notoriously long commission meetings ended abruptly Tuesday when Mayor Ward Friszolowski declared meetingswill end at 10 p.m. instead of 1 or 2 a.m. When Commissioner Linda Chaney objected, he made it clear it was not open to debate. "Let me just remind everyone that I set the agenda here and I'm going to stop it at 10 o'clock," he said. "People are saying, 'I want to watch the meetings. I want to participate in the meetings but I can't stay up until 1 or 2 in the morning.' Someone's got to make a decision, and that authority is vested in the mayor." Most commissioners believe they should determine a stopping point as a group. Chaney, Harry Metz and Ed Ruttencutter questionedthe city staff, citing a portion of the city charter that says the commission determines its rules of procedure. "I think it's a good idea as long as it's done legally," Metz said. "What the mayor did was in violation of the city charter." With the time limit, unfinished business would be pushed to the next meeting, which has some concerned because the commission has had trouble wading through packed agendas. Metz suggested Vice Mayor Mike Finnerty take over a meeting if the mayor tries to end it without the commission's consent. Finnerty, though, said the commission must focus on the issues at hand but added he would have gone about things differently. "I think we're going from one extreme to the other extreme," Finnerty said. "I think there's a better way to do it than what he did." Finnerty suggested the time limit remain 10 p.m. with the possibility of three or four monthly meetings instead of two, which might address concerns expressed by Ruttencutter. "He basically decided to eliminate all discussion by the commission or the residents," Ruttencutter said, noting the city manager's report, commission comment period and public comments were cut Tuesday. Ruttencutter e-mailed the city attorney to see if federal or state rules covered what he called "heavy-handed, dictatorial conduct." He said he expects a response this week. Nick Johnson can be reached at nick johnson@sptimes.com or 893-8361.
[Last modified December 1, 2007, 22:01:14]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Deborah Edney
|
12/04/07 10:10 AM
|
|
The back-room politics, can no longer be tolerated. HONESTY TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN OUR CITY GOVERNMENT IS THE ONLY WAY TO ASSURE FAIRNESS FOR ALL OF OUR RESIDENTS. MY FATHER A GREAT MAN TAUGHT ME THE MEANING OF HONOR,WHERE IS HONOR TODAY
|
|
by George
|
12/03/07 10:25 AM
|
|
Please resign Mr. Mayor, Mr. City Manager, and City Attorney. Get in tune with the city you serve. Open your ears, eyes, and close your mouth to listen to the residents you are supposed to serve. Return the city back to its residens, not money bags
|
|
by George singer
|
12/03/07 10:21 AM
|
|
I am OUTRAGED at the demeanor of the Mayor at the last city commission meeting. I have seen his arrogance at previous meetings also. Mr. Mayor get in tuned with the wishes of the residents of St. Pete Beach. We need better than what you provide.
|
|
by Deborah Edney
|
12/03/07 08:32 AM
|
|
Could you please, place this story on the PINELLAS site under Neighborhood times, it is not there.
|
|
by Deborah Edney
|
12/02/07 09:38 AM
|
|
SPB needs a man like Ruttencutter for our Mayor! Remember when Ed presided over the commission meeting? There was NO gaveling, NO disrespect, NO one thrown out of the meeting. Nov 27th meeting should outrage everyone. IF NOT, I WONDER WHY?
|
|
by Deborah Edney
|
12/02/07 08:41 AM
|
|
SPB city charter section 3.08 Procedure, Rules and journal. The COMMISSION shall determine its own rules of procedure and the mayor-COMMISSIONER shall set the order of business for EACH meeting.
|
|