News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Perspective
Regional rail planning gathers steam
A Times Editorial
Published December 2, 2007
It is easy to look ahead 40 years and see two very different pictures of the region. One shows congestion worsening as residents continue to come and businesses continue to expand. The second shows how a new approach to transportation can make our cities more livable and grow the economy while protecting our natural resources and quality of life. That is the vision Tampa Bay needs to pursue, and local leaders seem to be getting the point.
Officials in Tampa recently took several steps to improve the area's transit system in ways that would unify the region and make it a more convenient, affordable and prosperous place. Mayor Pam Iorio unveiled a rail plan to connect north Tampa to downtown and the West Shore business district. That line is the backbone of a larger commuter system that would extend to downtown St. Petersburg and fast-growing central Pasco. Tampa International Airport announced it would dedicate right of way to bring light rail into the passenger terminal, a huge plus for business travelers. Hillsborough County's transportation-planning agency endorsed Iorio's concept and signaled that it would put aside, for now, plans for an I-75 bypass in south county, which would unleash new development in the region's rural east.
These alternatives to more highways are exactly what the Legislature had in mind in creating the new regional transit authority. Made up of seven counties from Citrus to Sarasota, the agency has until July 2009 to craft a multimodal plan for moving people and goods up and down the Suncoast. The heavy push from Tampa helps build momentum not only for rail but for other mass transit improvements, such as express bus service, that could ease congestion in smaller counties until rail makes sense.
Rail could be at least a decade away; there is no master plan for the region, no dedicated funding source and no money set aside to operate the system. In today's dollars, Hillsborough's plan would cost $6-billion to build and $91-million a year to operate.
But the thinking already has changed. Two years ago, officials spoke with no commitment or urgency. Rail, if inevitable, was premature. Now everyone agrees the question is not whether but when and how to pay for regional mass transit. The days of selling rail as urban chic are over. According to planners, travel delays in the Tampa-St. Petersburg area between 1990 and 2005 were four times the growth rate. By 2030, delays will increase 300 percent. Working families in west-central Florida spend a third of their household income on transportation. Creating alternatives to the road is an economic issue for a region dependent on the tourist industry.
Leaders along the Suncoast also seem to recognize that rail can do more than reduce congestion. Mass transit is one of the few ways to attract new residents and business to already-developed urban cores. It is an alternative to wiping out neighborhoods for highway expansion. Leaders are warming to rail because it satisfies both economic and social concerns, from $3-a-gallon gas and sprawl to the reach and reliability of the existing transportation system.
A decision to build may be years away, but it's good the big picture is finally sinking in.
[Last modified December 3, 2007, 09:07:10]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Ben
|
12/06/07 04:48 PM
|
|
Raise taxes on roads, cars and gas to pay for public transit and people will use it. We spend too much on vehicle costs instead of more productive uses like education and medical. BRT could be up and running in a year.
|
|
by Ashon
|
12/04/07 07:51 PM
|
|
We could have rail in 5 to 7 years if we're committed to it. It's not about making the money back. We sink BILLIONS of dollars in for freeways that NEVER pay for themselves with no questions asked. Rail provides economic benefits beyond fares.
|
|
by Matt
|
12/04/07 12:39 PM
|
|
Unlike a ridiculous baseball stadium, this is truly a build and they will come deal. The Tampa Bay area is the largest urban area in the third most populous state in the union. Not having a light rail or monorail system would be utter foolishness
|
|
by JD
|
12/04/07 12:02 PM
|
|
Has anyone thought about intermodal mass transit? Cars would drive to rail collection points, drive on, the train would go to a destination area, and the cars would drive off. Other than this concept, population density is not there to make it work.
|
|
by John
|
12/03/07 02:14 PM
|
|
Lauren - HARTline has exclusive rights to provide public transit to the airport - until they agree to share there will be no Pinellas County connection. PSTA has led intercounty connectivity with 3 bus routes to HART's 1. Who follows who's lead?
|
|
by ?
|
12/03/07 06:06 AM
|
|
91 million a year? Do they expect to make that? What are the numbers they project regarding how many riders and prices?
|
|
by Alex
|
12/02/07 12:40 PM
|
|
Momentum is building for mass transit all around the country. It will happen faster than people expect. It doesn't take 10 years to acquire right of way and lay tracks if the will is there. More roads and cars are a problem, not a solution.
|
|
by Lauren
|
12/02/07 07:49 AM
|
|
Pinellas County and St. Petersburg should follow Tampa's example and take a real step toward rail connections from downtown St. Pete (and Clearwater) to West Shore and Tampa International.
|