Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Guest Column
Manatee reclassification is nonsense
By PATRICK ROSE
Published December 4, 2007
On Sept. 12 the World Conservation Union officially declared the Florida manatee endangered, using exactly the same criteria Florida officials are attempting to use to justify downgrading the manatee's status from endangered to threatened. After a scientific status review at the international level, the Florida manatee was declared endangered on the Red List, which is recognized as the most reliable evaluation of the world's species. The manatee's status evaluation was conducted and also reviewed by some of the world's most qualified sirenian scientists, who based their recommendation for listing as endangered on the most recent scientific data. Incongruously, Sept. 12 was the day the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission was scheduled to vote on whether to reclassify the manatee to a lesser state: imperiled status. This is a vote that marine industry representatives and go-fast boating interests have supported for many years. But just two days before this monumental vote, Gov. Charlie Crist came to the rescue and asked the Fish and Wildlife Commission for a reprieve for manatees, wisely urging them to postpone the vote, while also questioning the method used to estimate the size of the manatee population. Ultimately, the commission listened to the governor and unanimously voted to postpone the manatee's reclassification, but under pressure from boating and development interests will revisit this issue at its meeting Wednesday in Key Largo. How could the FWC, claiming to be using the World Conservation Union's widely supported listing/delisting criteria, conclude that manatees are no longer endangered and move to downlist them? The answer is simple. While the FWC adopted the union's criteria for endangered species, it opted to call species that met those criteria "threatened" instead of "endangered." Ironically, the FWC openly declares that manatees, with less than 2,500 adults, face a "very high risk of extinction," but want to wait until a species' risk of extinction is "imminent" before declaring it endangered. That's a sure recipe for future extinctions. The FWC continues to nonsensically argue that protections won't change if manatees are downlisted. In light of the hundreds of manatees killed since the unjustifiable reclassification process began, this argument seems disingenuous, at best. Already, numerous law enforcement positions are proposed to be cut because of state budget shortfalls. Furthermore, it is widely recognized that the natural springs and power plant discharges that most manatees depend on to survive the coldest winter days are likely to be lost in the not-too-distant future. With mortality continuing at a brisk pace this year, with threats from both human and natural causes escalating, and with the manatee's international biological status confirmed as endangered, it is time for the FWC to kill the unwarranted downlisting effort. Looking beyond manatees to Florida's other imperiled species, it is time for the FWC to fix its imperiled species classification system by adopting one where all of Florida's most-at-risk species can be fairly reviewed, classified properly and managed accordingly to sustain and recover their numbers in the wild. Please join me and the more than 20-million Americans who have already made known their objections to this politically driven subversion of imperiled species protections in Florida. Patrick Rose is an aquatic biologist and one of the world's leading experts on the Florida manatee. He also is executive director of Save the Manatee Club.
[Last modified December 3, 2007, 20:54:12]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by 4florida
|
12/05/07 06:21 AM
|
|
hardcoreufo makes Rose's point perfectly, FWC arbitrarily decided to call those species that meet the endangered criteria threatened
|
|
by John
|
12/04/07 04:26 PM
|
|
What do you expect hardcore?...Pat's a paid executive of the SMC.
|
|
by hardcoreUFO
|
12/04/07 11:32 AM
|
|
You need to do your homework, Pat. The state's "threatened" classification is IDENTICAL to the IUCN's "endangered" classification. They are exactly the same.
|
|
by Tom
|
12/04/07 11:31 AM
|
|
Endangered or Imperiled, it makes no difference. Its not like people are going ot start running them over intentionally all of a suddden or start hunting them.
|
|
by Reggie
|
12/04/07 10:00 AM
|
|
We the people love the Manatees and we hate the politicians who are bribed by special interest. It is in the best interest of the Manatee and the State of Florida that the Manatees stay listed as endangered.
|
|
by Astroman
|
12/04/07 08:34 AM
|
|
What Pat Rose KNOWS, and disingenuously MISLEADS the public about, is that IUCN's middle level of imperilment is called, "ENDANGERED", whereas Florida's middle level is called, "THREATENED". Both are based on the SAME criteria. Therefore, to be in al
|
|
by Mike
|
12/04/07 08:23 AM
|
|
This is laughable. Could anyone actually be gullable enough to believe that Mr. Rose, who is the head of the SMC with an annual salary of $64,740, would sincerely hold a fair, unbiased opinion on this matter? What a joke. Keep up the propoganda, SPT.
|
|