News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Perspective
A reality-based look at science
By ROBYN BLUMNER
Published December 9, 2007
What happened to Christine Comer makes me wonder whether America is really emerging from its Age of Unenlightenment.
Comer was forced to resign her position as director of science at the Texas Education Agency because she forwarded an e-mail about a lecture on the fallacy of "intelligent design" and creationism as a scientifically grounded alternative to evolution. Comer, who spent 27 years as a science teacher and had been in her post at the agency for nine years, was told that the agency must remain "neutral" on the subject.
Neutral? Are they kidding? On the one hand you have a theory that has been successfully tested using the scientific method for more than 100 years and whose accuracy has been repeatedly affirmed by the vast fields of biology and genetics. On the other hand you have a hypothesis that relies on supernatural intervention for which there has been no legitimate scientific testing or objective proof.
Florida is also now in a dust-up due to the inclusion of evolution in its proposed science standards. Donna Callaway, who was appointed to the state Board of Education by former Gov. Jeb Bush, said she'll oppose the new standards because of it.
Really folks, in this information age when scientific innovation is the key to our nation's future, we don't have the time to be mucking around in this tired debate. You don't produce doctors and scientists by teaching science from the Bible. Period.
Not surprisingly, a former adviser to George Bush as Texas governor who also worked in his federal Department of Education provoked the Comer witch hunt. Lizzette Reynolds, deputy commissioner for statewide policy and programs, complained about Comer's e-mail and called for her termination.
These are the kinds of dim-witted people who have been elevated to key posts in the Bush administration, marking it as one promoting loopy religiosity over fact and evidence.
Think about some of the administration's policies that have emanated from Bush's radical religious views:
- The suspension of most federal funding for embryonic stem-cell research (Bush to Parkinson's patients: Drop dead!).
- The spending of hundreds of millions of dollars on demonstrably useless abstinence-only sex education (Why Johnny has herpes).
- The effort to prevent emergency contraception from being sold over-the-counter (How to guarantee increased abortions).
- And the retraction of appropriated international family planning money (Ditto).
Bush's Iraq "crusade" is perhaps the most disturbing example of his Christian manichaeism, but even his administration's long-standing antagonism toward the evidence of man-made global warming has religious overtones, with a hint of The-End-Times-Are-Nigh uninterest in its consequences.
Yet in every case where the administration ignored objective fact or science in favor of religion, Bush took this country down the wrong path, harming people's lives and endangering health.
The "salvation" for those of us in the reality-based community is that the Bush administration is soon looking at its last year in office, and maybe, finally, the war on science is also coming to an end.
But maybe not.
Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee is gaining as a GOP presidential contender. He may be a friendly face, but the ordained Baptist minister is no friend to reason. In the Republican primary debate last May he was one of three in the field to raise his hand to proclaim that he does not believe in evolution.
In a later debate, Huckabee rejected for himself the belief that we are "descendants of a primate," magnanimously suggesting that it was okay if others chose to. Gee, thanks.
Pretty much all the presidential candidates, both Democrats and Republicans, are freely spouting off about the centrality of faith in their lives (with Mitt Romney promising that his is not too weird), but it is only Huckabee who is the dogma-driven real deal - a man who as president would follow in Bush's antiscience, anti-intellectual footsteps, a man who would feel "chosen" for the job and licensed by a power higher than the will of the voters.
The mission-zeal with which Bush has arrogated power and his maniacal unwillingness to compromise is packaged righteousness, pure and simple. Remember that Bush said he appealed to a "higher father" for strength when journalist Bob Woodward asked him if he'd consulted his father before invading Iraq.
Who needs information grounded in experience when you have prayer and prophesy?
And Huckabee would be Bush redux.
Here is something scary-ignorant. Last week, the Web site ChristiaNet.com, which bills itself as "the world's largest Christian portal," cheered the results of a survey it took finding that half of its 1,400 Christian respondents said that dinosaurs and man roamed the Earth at the same time.
Putting aside that the schoolteachers of these people should be slapped silly, these are Huckabee's peeps. We can't afford to put this kind of backward thinking and scientific illiteracy in the driver's seat again.
[Last modified December 10, 2007, 07:45:48]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by David
|
01/02/08 04:19 PM
|
|
Please keep up the outstanding work. When I read your articles I feel less alone in the world and I'm thankful for that.
|
|
by dan
|
12/30/07 08:57 AM
|
|
May god have mercy on your soul!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
by nancy
|
12/18/07 01:12 PM
|
|
Finally, a column telling it like it is. You're my new favorite columnist. Thanks.
|
|
by Tom
|
12/15/07 04:27 PM
|
|
Darwin made great strides and the original evolutionary theory no longer holds, if you care to put in the work on it. If you need to believe in a semi human God and attendant ideas, who's to criticise? But why vote for a fellow believer for PRESIDENT
|
|
by tom
|
12/15/07 04:14 PM
|
|
What's to prevent another puppet? This is the face of the real mob. Forget various mafias. But don't worry. We're building more prisons, to be privately owned and operated. You WILL see it.
|
|
by roger
|
12/14/07 11:10 AM
|
|
No, we can't prove that man wasn't created by a creator. We also can't prove that there isn't a teapot orbiting Uranus -- but that's no reason to believe in it. Evolution, OTOH, has overwhelming evidence to support it. Why fill kds minds with crp?
|
|
by Kim
|
12/14/07 07:22 AM
|
|
Christians like to believe Atheists are miserable and unhappy. Wrong. We have families we love, celebrate holidays, travel, give to charity, and participate in the community. We're happy because we don't toil under a burden of supposed "guilt".
|
|
by hesus
|
12/12/07 02:24 PM
|
|
Ms Blumner implies that evolution is fact, it is only a theory. And evidence? Using observable science - which is the only science that can be proven you will find NO support of the theory of evolution, but much support of ID * naturual selection.
|
|
by Judy
|
12/11/07 09:23 PM
|
|
I wonder, Ms. Blumner, what has happened in your life to cause you to be so negative? Jesus Christ can remove that bitterness and make you a new person. You'd better think about it--we're all just a heartbeat away from eternity.
|
|
by Simeon
|
12/11/07 01:16 PM
|
|
Creationism/ID only provides the illusion of understanding the natural world as its believers think "knowing who made something" is equal to actually knowing how it came about. ID/creationism simply reflects a failure to think critically.
|
|
by Jackie
|
12/11/07 09:02 AM
|
|
How and why does Blumner criticize and openly mock the religion and beliefs of Christians? Would she do that do Muslims? I bet not. Why does she get so bent ouf of shape about Christians? She monitors Christian sites? Is she a bigot? I think so.
|
|
by John
|
12/10/07 06:38 PM
|
|
Thanks for your important piece on evolution. "Believers" have been fighting scientific truth since the public burning of Giordano Bruno and the silencing of Galileo. If these folks win, how many years before burning at the stake returns?
|
|
by BobC
|
12/10/07 06:17 PM
|
|
ROBYN BLUMNER, This is the most intelligent article I have ever seen on a newspaper website. You are right about Huckabee. He would be a disaster. He would be called President Preacher Man. America would be the laughing-stock of the world.
|
|
by BobC
|
12/10/07 06:06 PM
|
|
Somebody asked "Why do creationists lie?" A better question would be why are creationists so stupid. They believe an invisible man in the clouds said "poof" to create people out of nothing. Creationists seem to be proud of their stupidity.
|
|
by Kay
|
12/10/07 03:30 PM
|
|
It's improper not to teach/discuss all theories. Do you expect the children not to make a connection or question... geez. You can learn & believe ID without having to do w/ religion.
|
|
by Wolfhound
|
12/10/07 01:51 PM
|
|
Fabulous column which says exactly what I've wanted to see in print. I expect the religious nutjobs will be positively apoplectic after reading it. Good. I've never understood why they feel compelled to legislate their nonsense.
|
|
by Brian
|
12/10/07 12:36 PM
|
|
I would suggest to anyone who would like to actually understand something about evolution, rather than parrot what their minister has told them, get themselves to the Talk-Origins Archive: http://www.talkorigins.org/
|
|
by Amanda
|
12/10/07 12:30 PM
|
|
Thank you, Ms. Blumner.
Evolution is a fact and a theory. A scientific theory that has held up to rigorous testing.
Andre-there is no violation of freedom of speech here...but possibly one of separation of church and state.
|
|
by Casey
|
12/10/07 11:41 AM
|
|
Well put Robyn. While I'm glad I don't live in an islamic theocracy, the religious right still disturbs me quite a bit. Please can we stop basing our society on centuries old mythology, or at least write a better mythology.
|
|
by Nick
|
12/10/07 09:15 AM
|
|
I completely agree. We must teach, not preach, and convey knowledge not belief.
|
|
by Ant
|
12/10/07 05:50 AM
|
|
Dawn: Science can't tell exactly when someone died, but they can tell within 1-10 years. Science can't tell exactly when dinosaurs died, but they can tell within 50 million years. Different processes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiometric_dating
|
|
by Mike
|
12/10/07 12:40 AM
|
|
This article reeks of political agenda & implies that a religious belief system is going to drive the country further in the toilet. Don't think the education system has improved in the past 45 years. Check yourself & history & see where we are now.
|
|
by rick
|
12/09/07 09:04 PM
|
|
back to the monkey trials i guess. can we please come out of the dark ages? jump out a plane w/o a parachute, leap of faith remember gravity is just a theory. and florida still ranks as the most stupid state and we can't figure out why..hmmmmm
|
|
by Drew
|
12/09/07 08:32 PM
|
|
No scientific theory is ever "conclusively proven". When compared with the number of biologists who accept evolution, the number who do not pales by comparison. And the methods of dating fossils are well tested and reliable, hardly "flawed".
|
|
by denny
|
12/09/07 06:48 PM
|
|
I don't want creation science or 'intelligent design' taught, but I think we are doing as much of a disservice to students by teaching evolution as fact. Much of Darwin's theory is just that - a theory - and people like Blumner act like it is proven.
|
|
by Russ
|
12/09/07 06:33 PM
|
|
Obviously Blummer worships in the church of liberalism. Is she just stupid or a liar? Evolution is NOT a fact, has never been proven and has more holes in it than a seive. I see she has a lot of company in La La land.
|
|
by Jay
|
12/09/07 06:26 PM
|
|
Superb column. Right on the mark. Robyn, I shall respond to your remarks with "Amen."
|
|
by Ray
|
12/09/07 04:40 PM
|
|
Attention Fundamentalist Loons: What if evolution is The Creator's way of having things develop on this planet? Have you no idea of how crazy you are in the belief that the planet is only 6000 years old? Find a cliff for your own personal Rapture.
|
|
by Ray
|
12/09/07 04:34 PM
|
|
The Fundamentalist Wacko American Taliban DO NOT know what a scientific theory is. To them a it is the same thing as an idea,a notion or a hankerin. Mud-for-Brains blatherers claim that the "theory" isn't "proven".Testing doesn't seek "proof",dolts.
|
|
by Al
|
12/09/07 04:12 PM
|
|
Speaking as aa ordained Christian minister, Robyn Blumner is absolutely correct in this column.
BTW, I'll side with Evolution any day over so-called "intelligent design."
|
|
by Jacob
|
12/09/07 03:27 PM
|
|
The author's continual railing against free speech (or "spouting" as she calls it) and most every other concept America has been founded upon is today what's most antiquated and frightening. Perhaps some day she can grow to become less closed minded.
|
|
by Andre
|
12/09/07 02:49 PM
|
|
For those idiots out there, a "theory" in science cannot be 100% proven....ever. That is why it is called a "theory". As such, gravity is also a theory, so is electro-magnetism. Hmm...I guess you should stop using your computer now huh?
|
|
by Nigel
|
12/09/07 02:43 PM
|
|
thanx for this one - my own view is that these good folks are hoist by their own fear-filled lives - fear of seeing their faith/"values"/WASP dominant culture slowly diminish in an inexorable trend towards non-belief & non-judgmental moral relativism
|
|
by Steve
|
12/09/07 02:40 PM
|
|
A little test for creationists who believe "many" scientists do not believe in evolutions: We have a major university here in town, USF, with a large scientific faculty. Why don't you go take a visit and personally ask them what they believe?
|
|
by Allen
|
12/09/07 02:39 PM
|
|
Jim's use of THEORY shows just how removed from science these zelots are. A THEORY Jim, is a tested hypothesis - not used in science like you use at the coffee shop. And Gene, they scientists who have faith know that it is not science.
|