News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Ignorance has no place in curriculum
A Times Editorial
Published December 10, 2007
When a member of the state Board of Education puts her religion before the educational needs of Florida students, she forfeits her standing as an education expert and should resign her post.
Donna Callaway of the board is objecting to the state's new proposed science standards because they include the teaching of evolution as the basis of modern biology. She told the Florida Baptist Witness, a religious newspaper in Jacksonville, that evolution "should not be taught to the exclusion of other theories of the origins of life."
Callaway clearly doesn't understand that there are no other scientifically grounded theories on the origins of life. Somehow Callaway, who is charged with making educational policy for the state, missed out on some basic education herself.
Unfortunately, she is not alone at the Department of Education. Charlie Carraway, director of instructional materials, dispatched e-mails using her job title and imploring people to "join me in keeping these standards from being approved." A department spokesman said Carraway was "counseled" for her actions. Firing would be more in order.
Evolution is a scientific theory the way gravity is a scientific theory. It has been repeatedly tested using the scientific method for more than a century. The more we learn about genetics, the fossil record and bio-diversity, the more Darwin's theory is confirmed as an accurate accounting of life's origins.
What Callaway wants is to bring religion into Florida's schools in the guise of science. The movement to teach "intelligent design" is really just a slightly more respectable version of creation theology. It presumes that a supernatural force, aka God, designed things and poof, creatures appeared on Earth fully formed in their current state.
And while this might be fine to teach in Bible studies courses, it is not by any stretch science. Intelligent design is not an alternate "theory;" rather it is an untested hypothesis for which there is no objective proof. Teaching this alongside evolution would be like teaching about a 6,000-year-old earth as an alternate view in a geology course. You may graduate a few extra preachers that way, but you are not going to add many Florida students to the ranks of medical doctors or scientists.
Florida's newly revised science standards finally raise the bar for our state and have been widely applauded by science teachers. But until we adopt and implement the changes, our students will continue to be competitively disadvantaged, making it harder for them to succeed in this technologically advanced world.
Callaway and her supporters, including Rep. Will Weatherford, R-Wesley Chapel, who is likely to become House speaker in 2011, are probably going to make a lot of noise trying to dumb-down the standards for the study of science. Their ignorance should be ignored. Florida's reputation as a place that prepares young people for the challenges of the future depends on it.
[Last modified December 10, 2007, 06:14:13]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Paul
|
12/11/07 12:15 PM
|
|
Not needed shows why we need the new science standards. A theory is a model that attempts to rigorously explain an observation. Evolution has been observed. The "Theory of Evolution" explains. Gravity is observed. The "Theory of Gravity" explains
|
|
by Beth
|
12/11/07 09:37 AM
|
|
What the devil are you people talking about? You can teach ID without religion? The Bible is "historically accurate?" Let me guess--you were "educated" in Florida? Or Texas?
|
|
by The Kid
|
12/11/07 07:55 AM
|
|
As always we have people who have never set foot inside a classroom aside from being a student making decisions about what should and should not be taught. You get infront of 25 students and try doing what we do everyday. Then we can debate.
|
|
by monkey man
|
12/11/07 07:50 AM
|
|
bring on the monkey trials, jump out a plane,yes make a leap of faith, gravity is only a "science" theory anyhow. you'd all be doing us a favor. how did these people get a degree? florida come out of the dark ages please? enlightenment is the way...
|
|
by John Strong
|
12/10/07 09:57 PM
|
|
The universe began as a seed. Pan Gu struck it with an axe, and split it in two, creating the Earth and the Sky. If Florida schools don't teach about Pan Gu, I am being oppressed by the State and will petition for redress.
|
|
by Ron
|
12/10/07 07:57 PM
|
|
As a philosopher, this debate goes back to at least William Paley's Natural Philosophy in 1802, and with Aquinas before. David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion 1779 refuted the 'watchmaker' analogy, as did R.Dawkins' The Blind Watchmaker"
|
|
by Notneeded
|
12/10/07 07:48 PM
|
|
The author of this article misunderstands a few things. Those who agree with Calloway and Carraway agree that those theories of science (evolution and gravity) should be taught, but as theories. These theories are being proposed as fact.
|
|
by jimmy
|
12/10/07 03:55 PM
|
|
Amazing how many Times readers who would endorse the hypothesis of Global Warming--and would teach it as 'science' in school--get all freaked out about creation ideas they differ with personally. What hypocrisy!
|
|
by Kay
|
12/10/07 03:00 PM
|
|
PhD is correct. You can teach ID without ever refering or implying anything religious. Teach every theory, that's the best way for children to learn. Perhaps we were planted here from another universe???
|
|
by Bryan
|
12/10/07 01:59 PM
|
|
Origins of life is a historical issue & the Bible is repeatedly shown to be an extremely accurate historical account.The scientific method (observation & repeatability) doesn't support the theory of evolution.Illogical jumps are made from what's seen
|
|
by s.h.
|
12/10/07 01:18 PM
|
|
300 years ago, the notion of any type of spaceflight could only be concieved by GOD. Last night I tried to make a plasma TV from items in my kitchen, no luck. This proves to me that only GOD is intelligent enough to make these things.
|
|
by PhD
|
12/10/07 11:13 AM
|
|
the scientific method, maybe it would lead them to discover that there is actually MORE evidence for an intelligent designer than there is for evolution. See "Case for a Creator" Lee Strobel, and "Darwin's Black Box" - Michael Behe, then decide.
|
|
by Dave
|
12/10/07 10:32 AM
|
|
I have a theory on how life started, I think we should teach that too! If you want to teach religion, teach it at a private school, or at Sunday school. Public school isn't the place.
|
|
by Pinellas
|
12/10/07 10:10 AM
|
|
I'm SOOOOO sick of religious fanatics trying to force their views on everyone else. I'm a christian, but that's between God and me. Mixing religion and gov't. is very dangerous. It's not working in any country that does it. KEEP RELIGION AT CHURCH.
|
|
by JT
|
12/10/07 10:06 AM
|
|
Good to see the SPT calling for good science in schools. Now they should call for the teaching of abstinence only as birth control since it is the only 100% effective method based on known science. Besides the anti-Christian bias all is good.
|
|
by JoeF
|
12/10/07 09:39 AM
|
|
A better solution would be, don't teach the evolution of human life, from any source. Not from the garden of Eden, nor from your monkey uncle. No, school system has the right to teach my kids about the origins of life, but me.
|
|
by A. J.
|
12/10/07 09:35 AM
|
|
Those who argue this nonsense, display their ignorance of both Science and Christianity. It isn't suppressing other viewpoints, but 'love thy neighbor' they should concentrate on, instead of the hypocracy
of publicy forcing beliefs on others.
|
|
by Jon
|
12/10/07 09:35 AM
|
|
I couldn't agree more. The U.S. is already behind the rest of the world with regard to science in schools. This will only be perpetuated by adding unempiraclly developed theories such as "intelligent design"--leave that to religion classes.
|
|
by Doug
|
12/10/07 09:29 AM
|
|
So where did the 1st Amoeba or whatever living thing, come from? Somehow, somewhere in ancient times...something went "poof".
|
|
by JH
|
12/10/07 08:02 AM
|
|
By being appointed by Governors who are ideologically beholden to the Religious Right.
|
|
by Concerned Parent
|
12/10/07 06:54 AM
|
|
"[S]hould resign"....naw, fire the reprobate. The nation is under attack from within by millions of Americans who believe "truth" can be deduced from religious authority into every corner of life. Science's modesty and tentativeness offends them.
|
|
by RAH
|
12/10/07 06:43 AM
|
|
Your ignorance should be ignored
|
|
by Pete
|
12/10/07 06:12 AM
|
|
Ignorancehas? S/B two words.Ignorance has..
|
|
by Tom
|
12/10/07 06:10 AM
|
|
and how do these people get on Boards of Education? Apathy?
|