St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Letter to the editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Gulf to teem with fish in cages if farms okayed

By STEPHEN NOHLGREN, Times Staff Writer
Published December 10, 2007


Technicians from Snapperfarm, started by an Eckerd College dropout, stand on top of a cage 2 miles off Puerto Rico. They harvest cobia, which grow to a marketable 10 pounds in about a year and tolerate tight spaces. One cage holds up to 70,000 pounds.
photo
[Ocean Farm Technologies]
ADVERTISEMENT

ST. PETERSBURG - Imports satisfy 80 percent of America's seafood craving. Shrimp, salmon, tilapia and other favorites journey thousands of miles to reach our plates but still undercut local prices because they are grown on high-intensity fish farms.

The federal government now wants to fight fire with fire, using the Gulf of Mexico as a vast, offshore fish farming laboratory.

Regulations under consideration next month would allow underwater cages the size of an average McDonald's restaurant, spread in clusters over dozens of acres. With each cage holding 70,000 to 100,000 pounds of fish, just two 40-cage farms in deep water could produce as much fresh seafood as Florida's grouper fleet hauls ashore in a year.

"Experts believe that offshore has great potential for all kinds of sustainable aquaculture," reports the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on its Web site.

Several environmental groups are leery.

Nearshore farming dramatically dropped global salmon prices but also polluted surrounding waters. Penned-in fish sometimes needed antibiotics and antiparasite medicine to survive. Non-native species, like the "Atlantic salmon" raised in Chile and British Columbia, sometimes escaped into the wild.

The proposed offshore rules "contain no specific pollution standards. We don't know what kind of effluent is going to be acceptable," said Maryanne Cufone, of Food and Water Watch. "We don't know what likely chemicals will be needed to keep the fish healthy and keep the cages free of fouling organisms. This is a new industry the federal government is trying to promote, but there is no reason to rush."

Horror stories from the salmon industry will not repeat themselves in the open gulf, said Wayne Swingle, director of the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council, which regulates gulf fish stocks. Gulf farms would probably locate 20 to 50 miles offshore. Steady current would quickly disperse fish waste and uneaten feed, he said.

Cages in deep water

These issues will be debated tonight in St. Petersburg at a special public hearing. After similar hearings in three other states, the management council is expected to vote on the regulations in January.

Brian O'Hanlon, who dropped out of Eckerd College several years ago to start a fish farm off Puerto Rico, said the gulf is ready for mariculture.

His Snapperfarm consists of two cages moored in the Caribbean, 2 miles offshore in 100 feet of water. One, an 85-by-50-foot cone, stays about 30 feet below the surface. The other, a 65-foot sphere, can float to the surface for feeding, monitoring and harvesting.

In 2004, Hurricane Jeanne passed over the cages with only minimal damage, he said, because the wave energy of hurricanes dissipates at about 20 feet.

Snapperfarm tried mutton snapper first, but they were slow growers. Now O'Hanlon raises cobia, a tasty white fish caught wild in the gulf. Cobia, also known as ling along the Eastern Seaboard, grow from egg to a marketable 10 pounds in about a year. They are also natural schoolers who tolerate tight spaces more than a territorial species like grouper would. One cage holds up to 70,000 pounds.

At first, the farm lost about 30 to 40 percent of its fish, mainly 1-month old fingerlings from the University of Miami that died during transport and transfer to the cages. Over time, the company learned to manage fish stress, O'Hanlon said, and now brings 90 percent of its fingerlings to harvest. They use no antibiotics, he said.

Snapperfarm is a niche operation, selling to New York and South Florida wholesalers. To compete globally, O'Hanlon said, a farm would probably require 20 to 40 cages in water 200 to 1,000 feet deep, perhaps with permanent floating platforms for on-site workers.

"The deeper the water, the more dilution (of feed and waste) you have," he said. "What we have to be careful of is loading the bottom."

Joe Hendrix, a Texas mariculture consultant, briefly operated an experimental redfish farm off an inactive oil rig in the late 1990s. A hurricane destroyed one of the pipe-and-netting pens and a second was ripped apart when it snagged on an oil rig.

Threat to fishing

Modern offshore cages, like O'Hanlon's, are made from wire mesh and can cost $100,000, plus installation. A cluster of eight, generally viewed as the smallest competitive scale, would cost more than $1-million before the first fingerling entered a cage.

Hendrix said cobia, redfish, pompano and flounder are farmable species because fingerlings are available.

Several investment groups are eager to start farming the gulf if the proposed regulations pass, he said, but now, only temporary permits are available. No one will pony up the initial cost for only a year of operation. As a lay member of the management council, Hendrix represents one of the nine votes necessary to implement the rules.

Other permits from the Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Coast Guard may also be required. Large-scale fish farming is new to the United States and regulation is disorganized. Legislation that would have a single agency regulate fish farming has stalled in Congress. So NOAA wants to move forward in the gulf.

The proposed rules would forbid non-native species and require that one-fourth of the brood stock change every year, so the gulf doesn't fill up with one, genetically vulnerable strain. But the rules do not specify where the farms would locate, raising the possibility that acres and acres of gulf bottom would be leased out and therefore be off-limits to competing fishermen.

If the Alaska salmon fishery is any example, plummeting prices might devastate Florida's already teetering commercial fishing fleet.

"If it's coming, it's coming. Our guys are not going to be able to stop it," said Bobby Spaeth, a Madeira Beach fish house owner who lobbies for commercial fishermen. "ConAgra or somebody like that is going to come in and make a big business of it.

"Maybe some of the guys will be able to get jobs tending the traps and pens."

Fast facts

If you go

What: Public hearing to discuss offshore marine fish farming

When: 6 to 9 p.m.

Where: Comfort Inn, 2260 54th Ave. N, St. Petersburg

Who: Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council

[Last modified December 9, 2007, 22:42:12]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by bill 12/18/07 10:16 AM
in my opinion..this is a complete waste of time and money. They say you should only eat fish once a month..so catching more than all of the fleets of florida is pointless..30-40 Cages..waste of money..
by justin 12/11/07 02:58 PM
this will take prime fishg locations away from normal fishermen
by sammy 12/11/07 01:41 PM
this parargraph is meant for children. Hi my name is sammy and i belive that all fish should not be contained in these cages to be killed and eaten!!!!!!
by tyner 12/11/07 01:15 PM
This could be a way of saving endangered species like Atlantic cod which are being terribly overfished.
by jennie 12/11/07 11:20 AM
I think its wrong but at the same time right cause who doesnt love FISH?? but i guess we will find out soon.
by ginard 12/11/07 10:25 AM
that all right with me old chaps
by jack 12/11/07 10:22 AM
whats wrong with you poeple
by taylor 12/11/07 10:16 AM
this is stupid why do they have to make the fish suffer?
by Adam 12/10/07 11:59 PM
Sounds great. Problem is this...how long before corps. like Monsanto start introducing "genetically enhanced" fish to these farms (like their 'cockroach-salmon' sold at Wal-Mart) and when those fish get loose out there what are the long term effects?
by chica 12/10/07 07:29 PM
this is a long time coming,we need to satisfy our demand for fish as a food vs beef. with the right gov't regulations this should prove worthwhile
by Mary 12/10/07 04:30 PM
Fish suffer horribly in these confinement systems. They are also detrimental to wild fish due to the parasites that flourish in them, the immense pollution they produce, and the inevitable escape of the imprisoned fish who then outcompete wild ones.
by mariah 12/10/07 02:00 PM
do we need so much fish? i mean we eat alot but imagine how much fish there will be if were bringin in the amount we pull a year every month i mean maybe its good were monitoring the fish. if we dont how do we know if were bring n a diseze or viru
by brown 12/10/07 12:34 PM
Not a good idea. Think long and hard on this idea.
by emma 12/10/07 11:11 AM
i dont feel good about this!
by teri 12/10/07 08:59 AM
then when someone gets sick from your caged fish they can sue ya,,and what of all the other fish in the cage ,,released into the sea to spread it, very dangerious stuff here, i vote not to have fish caged for natural reasons, you want it for profit,
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT