News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Sales taxes stir a fight
This time, the battle is in the budget reform commission.
By STEVE BOUSQUET, Tallahassee Bureau Chief
Published December 16, 2007
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[Steve Bousquet | Times]
Gene Adams, a lobbyist for the Coalition to Protect Florida's economy, testified Friday in opposition to a proposal to reduce property taxes by expanding the sales tax to include eliminating business exemptions and taxing business services.
|
|
TALLAHASSEE - The battle lines have been drawn once again on the future of Florida's sales tax system, and they look very familiar.
On one side is John McKay, a Bradenton real estate broker and former Senate president who has argued for years that Florida's sales tax base is much too narrow for such a big state.
McKay wants to expand the sales tax base by closing exemptions and taxing some services, using the new money to eliminate local property taxes that pay for schools, reducing property owners' tax bills by 40 percent or more.
On the other side are many of the same business interests who have fought McKay in the past, mobilizing once more to stop him and his allies in their tracks. They say taxing services or closing exemptions would shift a bigger chunk of the sales tax burden to businesses, put Florida at a competitive disadvantage with neighboring states and create a bureaucratic nightmare.
The battleground for these clashing forces is the Taxation and Budget Reform Commission, a panel of 25 prominent citizens formed every two decades to comprehensively study the state's tax system. McKay, a Republican who served as Senate president from 2000 to 2002, is one of its members.
On Friday, the commission's Government Procedures and Structure Committee debated the pros and cons of McKay's plan, and it was obvious that McKay once again will find himself fighting an uphill battle.
At issue are hundreds of exemptions from sales tax for items such as bottled water, charter fishing boats and newspaper advertising inserts, and services that are excluded from the tax code. They include real estate, legal and accounting services, lawn and swimming pool care and taxi and limousine rides.
McKay's plan, subject to approval by voters in 2008, would ask the Legislature to decide which exemptions to repeal, and which services to tax, to create about $9-billion a year in replacement revenue for the eliminating of a state-mandated property tax for schools known as required local effort. The major sales tax exemptions for groceries, prescription drugs, residential rent and electricity, would not be affected.
Broadening the sales tax base, McKay said, is like an investor diversifying his portfolio. It would insulate Florida from the boom-and-bust cycle of a depressed real estate market, the prime reason for state government's current fiscal mess. "If we don't broaden the tax base," McKay said in Friday's workshop, "there's going to be a huge, huge train wreck." He said Florida keeps piling more demands atop a narrow sales tax base, and the Legislature's growing reliance on local property taxes to fund schools illustrates the problem.
"I can't come up with an intelligent or philosophical reason for not taxing certain exclusions, like limousine service," McKay said.
The opponents were led by Gene Adams, a lobbyist for a group called the Coalition to Protect Florida's Economy, which he said speaks for 212,000 employers, including insurance and real estate agents, accountants, printing firms, the Florida Farm Bureau and National Federation of Independent Business. Adams cited studies that show business taxes are higher in Florida than in the Carolinas.
"We are not necessarily a low business-tax state," said Adams, who was joined by spokesmen for Associated Industries of Florida, the Florida Association of Realtors and the Florida Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Associated Industries of Florida's Jose Gonzalez said his group welcomes a case-by-case review of sales tax exemptions. "Most of these exemptions serve a public purpose," he testified.
Rallying to McKay's cause was another tax commission member, Lee County Property Appraiser Ken Wilkinson, considered a founding father of the Save Our Homes assessment cap on homesteaded property. He said the prospect of a major property tax break would be embraced by taxpayers. But other commission members were openly skeptical.
"No government, state or local, has ever taxed its way into prosperity," said Jacinta Mathis, a West Palm Beach lawyer.
Another member, lobbyist Greg Turbeville, whose firm represents many business clients, said McKay's approach shifts taxation from one group to another. "We're changing who's paying the same amount of tax dollars," Turbeville said.
Nancy Riley, a Clearwater real estate agent, echoed the concerns of Realtors that McKay's plan could result in a tax on real estate commissions.
McKay said the political clout of Realtors means the Legislature would never allow that to happen. "We should not be naive," he said.
While the taxation commission debates eliminating sales tax exemptions, the Legislature is moving in a similar direction. Sen. Mike Haridopolos, R-Melbourne, chairman of the Senate Finance and Taxation Committee, said the panel would begin reviewing sales tax exemptions next month. He emphasized that the effort would be to preserve exemptions that promote the state's economy, not to create more revenue for government programs.
[Last modified December 15, 2007, 21:38:48]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by D
|
12/16/07 08:25 PM
|
|
Give government more $ and they will spend it. In 2000, Prior to the real est. boom, local gov was operating on a much lower budget. They collected more money in taxes after the housing market soared. They found a way to blow it. Less Gov is answer.
|
|
by Jimmy
|
12/16/07 07:54 PM
|
|
I say no new taxes, just have local government reduce their spending.
Go back to 2004 budget & work from there if they do not know how.
|
|
by dionysis
|
12/16/07 04:54 PM
|
|
We would?nt need to have this conflict if the counties and state spent within their means. Its always "study" this and "commission"that and each time it costs 300k. Stop the spending of our tax dollars.
|
|
by OD
|
12/16/07 03:48 PM
|
|
An extra 3% sales tax paid by EVERYONE (tourists, part-time/seasonal residents, homeowners, renters, etc..) makes more sense than subsidizing people to not relocate without being taxed to death.
|
|
by Raptor
|
12/16/07 02:37 PM
|
|
We fought this battle during the Martinez tenure and won the legislative fight because of statespeople like Bud Gardner had courage to bite the bullet, do the best for the state ... to have a Governor cave to political pressure of business lobbyists
|
|
by Anthony
|
12/16/07 01:35 PM
|
|
As a business owner I would prefer a state income tax then a tax on services. McKay should listen to the league of women voters and other new ideas. Stop falling back on failed plans already just because it is your idea.
|
|
by pal
|
12/16/07 01:14 PM
|
|
There are certain exemptions that make zero sense. Tax dog food & not exotic pet food? No tax on skyboxes? Get rid of exclusions, discuss services.
|
|
by JT
|
12/16/07 11:10 AM
|
|
McKay is on the right track. Most Floridians will vote for closing tax loopholes for the rich and lowering property tax for everyone. Lawn care, pool services, accountants not to mention legal fee taxes vs. 40% less property tax. LET PEOPLE VOTE!
|
|
by Mel
|
12/16/07 09:35 AM
|
|
Too bad they can't come up with a way to stop spending/wasting tax money. How about a committe on bad spending.
|