|
|
News
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Perspective
Property tax measure is wrong for Florida
A Times Editorial
Published December 30, 2007
Over the next four weeks, Floridians will hear Gov. Charlie Crist, real estate agents and other supporters of the property tax amendment talk about how it will help homeowners, revive the housing market and jump-start the slumping economy. Do not be fooled. This state and its residents are facing serious economic challenges in 2008, but the amendment on the Jan. 29 ballot is not the answer. The amendment would double the $25,000 homestead exemption and allow homeowners to take up to $500,000 in Save Our Homes benefits with them when they move. But state economists this month cut the amount they project the amendment would save taxpayers over five years by 25 percent. The main reason: Far fewer homeowners are expected to move even with the new tax breaks. So even though this amendment primarily benefits taxpayers who theoretically need the least help -- homeowners with homestead exemptions and Save Our Homes benefits - the changes are not enough to ease the housing crisis and revive the state economy. An unfair property tax system undoubtedly contributes to the stalled housing market, but other factors may be more significant. Housing prices around Tampa Bay and elsewhere soared too high too fast, and the median sales price of a single family home in the last year has dropped 14 percent in Pinellas, 18 percent in Pasco and a more modest 5 percent in Hillsborough. Now too many recent homebuyers find their houses are worth less than their mortgages -- and many of those mortgages had adjustable rates that are scheduled to rise. The number of foreclosures are setting records. The property tax amendment is not going to help homeowners who bought more house than they could afford and now can't sell. First, the housing supply far outstrips demand. As the New York Times recently reported on the situation in the Fort Myers area, once one of the fast-growing in the country, more than 19,000 single-family homes and condos are on the market. Investors are leaving behind vacant houses, and builders are slashing prices and stopping work in developments that aren't finished. But even if prices are falling back to Earth, the subprime mortgage mess has tightened the entire mortgage market. It is much more difficult for many to obtain home loans they once would have easily gotten with few questions asked. There are many good reasons to vote against the property tax amendment. It provides little help to businesses and owners of second homes or investment properties who need the most relief. Instead of creating a fairer property tax system it adds to the unfairness by allowing Save Our Homes benefits to be taken to a new home. And even with its projected reduced savings, the amendment still would cut funding for education and local government exactly as their revenues will be dropping because of other tax reforms and the slumping economy. But perhaps the most important reason to reject the amendment may be the easiest one to grasp: It won't solve Florida's real estate problems. Remember that as the governor and the amendment's other supporters crank up their sales pitches after New Year's.
[Last modified December 29, 2007, 22:03:06]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Bob
|
01/13/08 06:40 PM
|
|
I'm voting NO on this. I'm for property tax equality, not continued handouts to longtime SOH homeowners who have had their cake for years with lower property taxes. Now they want to eat it, too! SOH is unfair and inequitable. This makes it worse!
|
|
by It's the INSURANCE!
|
01/13/08 06:09 PM
|
|
FIX THE INSURANCE!! It's the INSURANCE that's killing the average home-owner. We pay lower taxes than most of the rest of the country. If we weren't being bled dry by homeowners ins, the taxes would be a non-issue.
|
|
by It's the INSURANCE!
|
01/12/08 11:15 PM
|
|
FIX THE INSURANCE!! It's the INSURANCE that's killing the average home-owner. We pay lower taxes than most of the rest of the country. If we weren't being bled dry by homeowners ins, the taxes would be a non-issue.
|
|
by Pete
|
01/04/08 09:33 AM
|
|
Wake up Florida! You all do remember even if they are cutting back their spending the countries are still collecting are money. So where is this money going if they are cutting back? taxes are still at same level Hello its a smoke a mirror game
|
|
by CJ
|
01/04/08 07:19 AM
|
|
So the 'Times' says vote no becuase it only helps a little? Good going.
Now we get nothing. It could have been a start toward more change. Now...nothing. 1st time buyers suffer. Business suffers as 2nd homeowners leave. Less revenue. Higher taxes.
|
|
by djie
|
01/03/08 04:59 PM
|
|
I agree the property tax measure is not enough, but is it reason enough not to vote for it ? Why not vote for it, and ask for more ?
If it takes more years to find a solution, as it will, we at least have already this small drop in the bucket...
|
|
by Tomas
|
01/03/08 09:19 AM
|
|
tax measure is wrong , SURE IS, I have a lot for which I pay taxes based on 38,000 dollars, but the lots around here same size are sold fro 15,000 or less.
|
|
by Mark
|
01/03/08 04:56 AM
|
|
Florida needs to bite the bullet and seriously consider a state income tax!
|
|
by It's the INSURANCE!
|
01/02/08 02:01 PM
|
|
FIX THE INSURANCE!! It's the INSURANCE that's killing the average home-owner. We pay lower taxes than most of the rest of the country. If we weren't being bled dry by homeowners ins, the taxes would be a non-issue.
|
|
by John
|
01/02/08 11:28 AM
|
|
I am a 2005 homebuyer in Brandon. My neighbor next door pays 4100/yr taxes. I pay 7200/yr identical houses. So let me get this straight, this bill increases the inequity. I'm certain 40-50 percent will vote NO, so it's back to the drawing board.
|
|
by dave
|
01/02/08 07:17 AM
|
|
lets tax those evil business and second home owners right out of this state and when the second owners leave the state because of high prop tax they can take their billions in sales tax they pay with them. Are some of you people that that stupid ?
|
|
by David
|
01/01/08 08:49 AM
|
|
There are a lot of problems this doesn't address. And it is our job to continue to pressure the lawmakers to fix these problems. But we must vote YES on this small fix, otherwise the OVERSPENDERS will assume we like their use of our money.
|
|
by james
|
01/01/08 01:09 AM
|
|
Govt. agencies refuse to roll back rates to pre-bubble rates yet want us to keep paying and take no action. I'll vote yes and hope that the idiot bureaucrats get the message to start spend our money efficiently. The media and govt just don't get it
|
|
by Tom
|
12/31/07 10:57 PM
|
|
The Times states that the most important reason to reject the property tax amendment is that it will not solve Florida's real estate problems. This is great "wrap it up" rhetoric. "Save Our Homes" ran many good citizens and homeowners right out of FL
|
|
by HICPAC
|
12/31/07 12:57 PM
|
|
google "subject to unpredictable fluctuations". SOH & SubPrime ARE "jump start" growth measures that caused over supply. SOH increases housing inventory because it is a builder friendly govmnt intervention & the State of FL invests in SubPrime, Why?
|
|
by Trish
|
12/31/07 12:14 PM
|
|
We need property taxes reduced if you need to raise the state taxes that would be BEST for our economy. Raisubg Taxes is making people move from our state, and that is not helping the economy
|
|
by DT
|
12/31/07 10:36 AM
|
|
the NEGATIVE and liberal Times editors are on the WRONG side of REALITY. GOV'T WASTE of taxpayers $$ is unfair. Not cutting millages in CRIMINAL. PORTABILITY WILL HELP. this is not a PERFECT solution, but we don't live in a perfect world. VOTE YES
|
|
by dave
|
12/31/07 07:15 AM
|
|
I am an out of state owner of a townhome in dunedin my neighbor next door pays 2300/yr taxes. I pay 5700/yr identical units. So let me get this straight, My neighbor is to get an even bigger break while my taxes will rise even more?
|
|
by TC
|
12/31/07 06:54 AM
|
|
OK. maybe it doesnt solve the real estate crisis, but it does offer tax relief to some. The article doesnt say what harm if any that the ammendment does.
|
|
by RWJ
|
12/30/07 11:15 PM
|
|
Business, Owners of a "Second Home" and investors, The amendment won't help them?, Well sorry about that, if you can own a second home, you can pay the taxes, Investors, they helped to artifically raise the price of those homes, Business, yup Walmart
|
|
by John
|
12/30/07 10:49 PM
|
|
Businesses and owners of second homes or investment properties DO NOT NEED this more then others. Who are you trying to kid.
|
|
by Gil
|
12/30/07 08:31 PM
|
|
I agree that the amendment is far less than we need. Many legislators ignored those of us who were for real property tax relief for all, including small business and second home owners. Unfortunately, this may be the best we get so I am voting YES.
|
|
by NO
|
12/30/07 08:14 PM
|
|
I'm less concerned with second home owners. I also think business should be handled separately to prevent compromising on the issues. I will vote NO because this does nothing to help 1st time buyers.
|
|
by bird
|
12/30/07 08:13 PM
|
|
I don't think it resolves all the problems but it is better than nothing. More steps can and should be taken in the future.
|
|
by Phil
|
12/30/07 08:02 PM
|
|
The voters of Florida should reject this deeply flawed and laughable amendment, and begin to embrace a more comprehensive plan - such as the 1.35% Tax Solution advocated by Speaker Rubio and others.
|
|
by Don
|
12/30/07 07:39 PM
|
|
I concur, this is not a tax reform read the fine print.... We need realtax reform by starting with less spending by Govt.
|
|
by Mike
|
12/30/07 05:30 PM
|
|
You need to get the facts...some of us have been stuck in our homes because of outrageous taxes. Florida needs this and you need to get a life
|
|
by tracy
|
12/30/07 04:36 PM
|
|
finally....someone is speaking the truth about this crummy tax relief from uncle charlie and his cronies.i would'nt vote for this rediculous piece of .....
|
|
by mike
|
12/30/07 02:36 PM
|
|
IT'S EASY....
1 ELIMINATE PROPERTY TAX ANND ALL ITS' ATTENDANT NONSENSES, HOMESTEADERS, ETC
ADJUST SALES TAX TO PROVIDE ENOUGH REVENUE FOR OUR COLLECTIVE REQUIREMENTS.
PROPERTY TAX ADMINISTRATORS CAN BE FREED FOR PRODUCTIVE JOBS. WIN, WIN.
|
|
by Gil
|
12/30/07 02:02 PM
|
|
The editorial is right on point. Tax parity is the answer and we won't get it with this ridiculous Amendment. I'll vote NO on January 29th. Send a message to the legislature and the Governor that we DEMAND real tax reform--not $240 a year savings.
|
|
by New Homeowner
|
12/30/07 01:48 PM
|
|
Couldn't care less if owners of second homes have higher taxes. Luxeries should be taked higher then necessities. SOH works as it provides ALL homeowners the opportunity to budget for taxes over the long term and assure their home remains affordable.
|
|
by Edward
|
12/30/07 01:42 PM
|
|
The editorial fails to mention that the proposed constitutional amendment to modify one part of our property tax system is the first in a series of contemplated changes. The editorial also fails to mention notorious inaccuracy in economic prediction.
|
|
by Jeff
|
12/30/07 11:03 AM
|
|
You think that owners of second homes and investment properties need the most help? That's funny !
|
|
by Jack
|
12/30/07 10:43 AM
|
|
Even if this does pass, don't think your property taxes will go down for long, if at all. Cities and Countys can always increase the assessed valuation of your property to make sure they get that tax money back.
|
|
by Tom
|
12/30/07 09:58 AM
|
|
I agree, I will be voting against the measure. I am a middle class guy and it won't provide much help to me or anyone I know. The county's are really hurting for revenue and this will only make it worse.
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
|